바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.4
Citation Share

Verifying use of reference points in the number line estimation task

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2016, v.28 no.4, pp.653-673
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.4.003



& (2016). Verifying use of reference points in the number line estimation task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28(4), 653-673, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.4.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Number line estimation task has been widely used to test spatial representation of numerical concepts. However, the claim of power model that participants respond based on a few reference points suggests the possibility that results can be affected by cognitive strategies. The current research tested whether use of reference points in number line estimation task affects shape of mental number line, that is, participants’ response patterns. Based on the reliable linearity reported in adults’ mental number line, we asked our adult participants to estimate positions including both reference points and those close to the reference points, and then observed whether there happens any change in the typical linearity in number line estimation. The results showed linearity in the middle reference points, but the tendency was fairly weaker in the other reference points. In particular, greater estimation bias was observed for the positions closer to the reference points, indicating use of reference points in estimation and importance of middle reference point. In addition, bipolar response tendency was obtained where participants underestimate or overestimate reference points on the left or right side of the line, respectively. Additional experimental results showed stronger bipolarity for longer line lengths, suggesting importance of line length in number line estimation task. These results imply that researchers need to be cautious in interpretation of experimental data as the results can be easily affected by various perceptual and cognitive factors.

keywords
내적수직선, 수직선추정과제, 비율판단의 파워모형, 기준점 책략, 선분 길이, mental number line, number line estimation task, power model of proportion judgment, cyclical model, line length

Reference

1.

Anton-Erxleben, K., Henrich, C., & Treue, S. (2007). Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. Journal of Vision, 7, 5.

2.

Barth, H. C., & Paladino, A. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science, 14, 125-135.

3.

Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25years. Vision Research, 51, 1484-1525.

4.

Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308-313.

5.

Chesney, D. L., & Matthews, P. G. (2013). Knowledge on the line: Manipulating beliefs about the magnitudes of symbolic numbers affects the linearity of line estimation tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1146-1153.

6.

Dackermann, T., Huber, S., Bahnmueller, J., Nuerk, H. C., & Moeller, K. (2015). An integration of competing accounts on children’s number line estimation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.

7.

Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

8.

Ebersbach, M., Luwel, K., Frick, A., Onghena, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2008). The relationship between the shape of the mental number line and familiarity with numbers in 5-to 9-year old children: Evidence for a segmented linear model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 1-17.

9.

Friso-van den Bos, I., Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E., Xenidou-Dervou, I., Jonkman, L. M., Van der Schoot, M., & Van Lieshout, E. C. (2015). Longitudinal development of number line estimation and mathematics performance in primary school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 134, 12-29.

10.

Gobell, J., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science, 16, 644-651.

11.

Hollands, J. G., & Dyre, B. P. (2000). Bias in proportion judgments: The cyclical power model. Psychological Review, 107, 500.

12.

Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.

13.

Moeller, K., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H. C. (2009). Children’s early mental number line: Logarithmic or decomposed linear?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 503-515.

14.

Opfer, J. E., Thompson, C. A., & Kim, D. (2016). Free versus anchored numerical estimation: A unified approach. Cognition, 149, 11-17.

15.

Rips, L. J. (2013). How many is a zillion? Sources of number distortion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1257.

16.

Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-250.

17.

Slusser, E. B., Santiago, R. T., & Barth, H. C. (2013). Developmental change in numerical estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142, 193.

18.

Spence, I. (1990). Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 683.

19.

Spence, I., & Krizel, P. (1994). Children's perception of proportion in graphs. Child Development, 65, 1193-1213.

20.

Sullivan, J. L., Juhasz, B. J., Slattery, T. J., & Barth, H. C. (2011). Adults’ number-line estimation strategies: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 557-563.

21.

Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude:common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483-488.

22.

White, S. L., & Szűcs, D. (2012). Representational change and strategy use in children's number line estimation during the first years of primary school. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8, 1.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy