바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.2
Citation Share

Different influences of visual associative memory on the neural activity in the human ventral occipital cortex

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.2, pp.153-164
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.2.003


& (2017). Different influences of visual associative memory on the neural activity in the human ventral occipital cortex. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 29(2), 153-164, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.2.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Specific responses in the fusiform face area (FFA) and the parahippocampal place area (PPA) presumably underlie visual object recognition, with the relative strength of neural activity coding for the object class. However, the issue of whether these areas rest on fundamentally distinct computational processes is an unexplored area. In this study, we examined whether object-class specificity is modifiable by the long-term learning of tasks that involve faces or buildings. The experiment consisted of four fMRI sessions over eight weeks. Eleven participants were involved in two novel tasks in which faces were arbitrarily associated with two-dimensional coordinates, and buildings were associated with architectural styles. As the learning progressed, BOLD responses at the FFA significantly decreased in the associative learning tasks regardless of the object class, while no such change was observed for brain activity at the PPA. These findings suggest that the FFA plays a role in visual associative memory. As the associations grow more efficient as the result of repeated experience, the neural activity required for retrieval may decrease in strength and/or in duration, leading to less BOLD activation.

keywords
FFA, PPA, long-term learning, visual associative memory, neural circuitry changes, Fusiform Face Area, Parahippocampal Place Area, 장기기억, 시각연합기억, 신경기전 변화

Reference

1.

Aguirre, G. K., Zarahn, E., & D’Esposito, M. (1998). An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to ‘‘building’’ stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron, 21, 373–383.

2.

Boynton, G. M., Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996). Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4207-4221.

3.

Egner, T., Monti, J. M., & Summerfield, C. (2010). Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 16601-16608.

4.

Epstein, R. (2008). Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 388-396.

5.

Epstein, R., Harris, A., Stanley, D., & Kanwisher, N. (1999), The parahippocampal Place Area:recognition, navigation or encoding?. Neuron, 23, 115- 125.

6.

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568-573.

7.

Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 14-23.

8.

Henson, R. N. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology, 70, 53–81.

9.

Jiang, X., Bradley, E., Rini, R. A., Zeffiro, T., VanMeter, J., & Riesenhuber, M. (2007). Categorization training results in shape and category-selective human neural plasticity. Neuron, 53, 891-903.

10.

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.

11.

Kanwisher, N., & Yovel, G. (2006), The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophy Transaction of Royal Society B, 361, 2109-2128.

12.

Mayrhauser, L., Crone, J. J., & Kronbichler, M. (2014). Neural repetition suppression: evidence for perceptual expectation in object-selective regions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 225.

13.

McGugin, R. W., Newton, A. T., Gore, J. C., & Gauthier, I. (2014). Robust expertise effects in right FFA. Neuropsychologia, 63, 135-144.

14.

McKeeff, T. J., Remus, D. A., & Tong, F. (2007). Temporal limitations in object processing across the human ventral visual pathway. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 382–393.

15.

Talairach, J., & Turnoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain:3-Dimensional proportional system. New York, NY: Thieme.

16.

Tsakiris, M., & Apps, M. A. (2013). Predictive codes of familiarity and context during the perceptual learning of facial identities. Nature Communications, 4, 2698.

17.

Van den Linden, M., Murre, J. M. J., van & Turennout, M. (2008). Birds of a feather flock together: experience-driven formation of visual object categories in human ventral temporal cortex. PLoS ONE, 3, 1-11.

18.

Van Turennout, M., Ellmore, T., & Martin, M. (2000). Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1329-1334.

19.

Weisberg, J., van Turennout, M., & Martin, A. (2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral. Cortex, 17, 513-521.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy