바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.4
Citation Share

Individual differences in the morphological decomposition of Hanja words

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.4, pp.455-462
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.008


& (2017). Individual differences in the morphological decomposition of Hanja words. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 29(4), 455-462, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study investigated individual differences in morphological priming using Hanja compound words as stimuli. Participants were divided into high and low MA groups, according to the morphological awareness (MA) score. Morphological relation between prime and target was manipulated as identical, different, pseudo, or unrelated. Participants performed the primed lexical decision task with primes masked. The results showed that morphological priming effects differed according to morphological awareness. Facilitatory priming effect was only significant for the high-MA group, suggesting that the representation and processing of Hanja compounds might be different among individuals with varied morphological knowledge. The results from the high-MA group are consistent with the semantic-morphological decomposition hypothesis. Based on the results, the structure and access of the Korean mental lexicon were discussed in relation to individual difference.

keywords
형태소 점화 효과, 한자어, 형태소 인식력, 개인차, morphological priming, morphological awareness, individual difference, Hanja words

Reference

1.

Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 279-296.

2.

Bae, S., & Yi, K. (2010). Processing of orthography and phonology in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22, 369-385.

3.

Bae, S., Yi, K., & Masuda, H. (2016). Morphological processing within the learning of new words: A study on individual differences. The Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 27, 159-180.

4.

Bae, S., & Yi, K., & Park, H. (2012). Semantic transparency effects in the recognition and learning of Sino-Korean words. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 607-620.

5.

Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2010). Form and meaning in early morphological processing:Comment on Feldman, O’Connor and Moscoso del Prado Martin. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 749-755.

6.

Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of formthen-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684-691.

7.

Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &Computers, 35, 116-124.

8.

Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128-156.

9.

Joyce, T. (2002). Constituent-morpheme priming:Implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words, Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 79-90.

10.

Kang, J., Nam, S., Lim, H., & Nam, K. (2016). ERP indices of Korean derivational prefix morphemes separated from the semantic and orthographic information. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 26, 409-430.

11.

Kim, H. (2005). Hyeondae Gugeo Sayong Bindo Josa 2. Seoul: The National Institute of the Korean Language.

12.

Nam, S., Baik, Y., Lim, H., & Nam, K. (2014). Different time courses of orthographic, morphological, and semantic activation during Korean prefixed derivational word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 26, 1-20.

13.

Pastizzo, M. J., & Feldman, L. B. (2004). Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain and Language, 90, 31-39.

14.

Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383.

15.

Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942-971.

16.

Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17.

Taft, M., & Forster, K. J. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.

18.

Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Sibley, D. E., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 53.

19.

Yi, K., & Bae, S. (2009). Effects of orthographic and morphological frequency of a syllable in Korean word recognition. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20, 309-333.

20.

Yi, K., Jung, J., & Bae, S. (2007). Writing system and visual word recognition: Morphological representation and processing in Korean. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 313-327.

21.

Yi, K., & Yi, I. (1999). Morphological processing in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11, 77-91.

22.

Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., Huang, J., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing in word recognition and production: evidence from ambiguous morphemes. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 543-560.

23.

Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525-565.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy