바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.1
Citation Share

Testing Context Dependency of the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes(SNARC) Effect using Color Discrimination

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.1, pp.61-68
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.1.005


& (2018). Testing Context Dependency of the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes(SNARC) Effect using Color Discrimination. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 30(1), 61-68, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.1.005
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The Spatial-Numerical Association Response Codes (SNARC) effect refers to the phenomenon in which smaller vs. larger numbers are responded to more efficiently in the left vs. right side of space, respectively. The SNARC effect is studied as an important phenomenon that reflects the nature of numerical representations. The present study examined whether the SNARC effect is observed during color judgement of numbers in order to verify whether number magnitude is automatically processed. In addition, two blocks of experiments were administered using a different range of numbers (2-9 for block 1 and 1-50 for block 2) in order to verify whether the pattern of the SNARC effect depends on the number range within an experimental block. As a result, the left hand responded faster to numbers 6-9 in block 1, but the right hand responded faster to the same numbers in block 2. This result confirms that the SNARC effect occurs automatically in a context-dependent pattern even during color judgment which does not require processing of number magnitude. The present study implies that the relative magnitude of a number is processed automatically with reference to the current experimental context.

keywords
공간-수 반응 코드 연합(SNARC) 효과, 수 처리의 맥락 의존성, 색상 변별 과제, Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes(SNARC) effect, Context Dependency of Number processing, Color Discrimination task

Reference

1.

Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371.

2.

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626.

3.

Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical cognition, 2(1), 95-110.

4.

Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 415-423.

5.

Hoffmann, D., Hornung, C., Martin, R., & Schiltz, C. (2013). Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds. Journal of experimental child psychology, 116(4), 775-791.

6.

Keus, I. M., Jenks, K. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 48-56.

7.

Lee, D., Chun, J., & Cho, S. (2016). The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes. Perception, 45(5), 552- 567.

8.

Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 149.

9.

Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., & Willmes, K. (2005). The universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental psychology, 52(3), 187-194.

10.

Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 328-331.

11.

van Galen, M. S., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude: A study of the SNARC effect in 7-to 9-year-olds. Journal of experimental child psychology, 101(2), 99-113.

12.

Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy