바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.2
Citation Share

<Brief report> Influence of Emotion Labeling on the Judgment of Emotion Category of Facial Emotion

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.2, pp.203-210
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.2.007
Hyeonbo Yang (Department of Psychology, Pusan National University)
Donghoon Lee (Department of Psychology, Pusan National University)
Yang, H., & Lee, D. (2018). <Brief report> Influence of Emotion Labeling on the Judgment of Emotion Category of Facial Emotion. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 30(2), 203-210, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.2.007
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

According to the psychological construction theory of emotion, labeling an affect promotes the construction of the conceptual representation of facial expressions (Lindquist, MacCormack & Shablack, 2015). In the present study, we investigated the effect of emotion labels on the categorical judgment of emotion of facial stimuli using a psychophysical method. We also tried to compare two conditions under which labels were read aloud or silently to see if the auditory feedback accompanying the utterance would increase the effect. During the experiment, one of three words ('Happiness', 'Anger', and 'Mass') was presented and participants read aloud the word if it was underlined. Then, a target face, randomly chosen from 6 gradually morphed faces from Happy to Angry, was presented for a two-alternative forced choice task ('Happy' or 'Angry'). Using a psychometric function, points of subjective equality (PSEs) of participants were estimated and statistically analyzed. Compared with the non-emotional word, reading an emotional word, 'Happiness' or 'Anger', significantly changed the PSE. Moreover, when the word 'Happiness' was read aloud, the PSE was further biased to Happy. By demonstrating emotion labels change the perceptual category boundary of facial emotion, current results support the claims of Lindquist et al.(2015) that language has an important role in the process of constructing emotion.

keywords
Psychological constructionism, Emotion label, Auditory feedback, Point of Subjective Equality(PSE)
Submission Date
2018-02-24
Revised Date
2018-04-25
Accepted Date
2018-04-26

Reference

1.

Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28-58.

2.

Barrett, L. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 20-46.

3.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.

4.

Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384-392.

5.

Etcoff, N. L., & Magee, J. J. (1992). Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition, 44(3), 227-240.

6.

Fugate, J., Gouzoules, H., & Barrett, L. F. (2010). Reading chimpanzee faces: Evidence for the role of verbal labels in categorical perception of emotion. Emotion, 10(4), 544-554.

7.

Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(3), 347-374.

8.

Izard, C. E. (1994). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 288-299.

9.

Kim, S. W., Shin, H. J., Kim, B. A., & Lee, D. H. (2016). Analysis of Response Characteristics in the Judgment of Emotion for a Group of Emotional Faces. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28(3), 389-407.

10.

Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2014). Auditory feedback of one’s own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: The “self-comprehension” hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 166.

11.

Lindquist, K. A. (2013). Emotions emerge from more basic psychological ingredients: A modern psychological constructionist model. Emotion Review, 5(4), 356-368.

12.

Lindquist, K. A., Barrett, L. F., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Russell, J. A. (2006). Language and the perception of emotion. Emotion, 6(1), 125-138.

13.

Lindquist, K. A., MacCormack, J. K., & Shablack, H. (2015). The role of language in emotion: Predictions from psychological constructionism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 444.

14.

Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 54.

15.

Lupyan, G., & Swingley, D. (2012). Self-directed speech affects visual search performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1068-1085.

16.

Nook, E. C., Lindquist, K. A., & Zaki, J. (2015). A new look at emotion perception: Concepts speed and shape facial emotion recognition. Emotion, 15(5), 569-578.

17.

Oh, S. J. (2015). An introduction to non-linear data fitting using the Microsoft Excel. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 34(3), 741-767.

18.

Roberson, D., Damjanovic, L., & Pilling, M. (2007). Categorical perception of facial expressions: Evidence for a “category adjustment” model. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1814-1829.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy