바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Syllable transposition effect on processing the morphologically complex Korean noun Eojeol

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.3, pp.261-268
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.3.004



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Reference

1.

Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800.

2.

Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2013). Is morphological priming stronger for transparent than opaque words? It depends on individual differences in spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 279-296.

3.

Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1798-1819.

4.

Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(2), 225–241.

5.

Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.

6.

Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.

7.

Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1557-1575.

8.

Frankish, C., & Turner, E. (2007). SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211.

9.

García-Orza, J., Pera, M., & Muñoz, S. (2010). Are transposition effects specific to letters?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1603-1618.

10.

Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.

11.

Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2012). Task-dependent masked priming effects in visual word recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 178.

12.

Lee, C. H., Kwon, Y., Kim, K., & Rastle, K. (2015). Syllable Transposition Effects in Korean Word Recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(3), 309-315.

13.

Lee, C. H., & Lee, Y. (2014). A review on the Models of letter transposition effect and exploration of hangul model. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 25, 1-24.

14.

Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542.

15.

Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 129-134.

16.

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.

17.

Min, S. K., & Yi, K. O. (2005b). Lexical access in processing Korean noun eojeols. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Human and Cognitive Language Technology, 57-62.

18.

Min, S. K., & Yi, K. O. (2010). Processing of Korean noun eojeols. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22, 621-638.

19.

Nam, K. C., Seo, K. J., Choi, K. S., Lee, K. I., Kim, T. H., & Lee, M. Y. (1997). The word length effect on hangul word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 9, 1-18.

20.

Nam, K. S., & Ko, Y. K. (1985). The Standard Grammar of Korean. Seoul: Top Press.

21.

O’Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 78-92.

22.

Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.

23.

Perea, M., Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search for an input-coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375-380.

24.

Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7-8), 942-971.

25.

Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090-1098.

26.

Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4-6), 482-501.

27.

Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference?. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 988-996.

28.

Simpson, G. B., & Kang, H. (2004). Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing, 17, 137-151.

29.

Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917-938.

30.

Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nature of orthographic and morphological processing?. Cognition, 118, 141-156.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology