바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.2
Citation Share

Iconicity of Korean Sign Language and “Tip of the Fingers” Experiences

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2019, v.31 no.2, pp.81-88
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2019.31.2.002

(2019). Iconicity of Korean Sign Language and “Tip of the Fingers” Experiences. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 31(2), 81-88, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2019.31.2.002
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Signed languages are generally more dominant in visual modality than spoken languages. This study (N=29) examined whether the “tip of the fingers (TOF)” phenomenon 　for sign language would parallel to the “tip of the tongue (TOT)” phenomenon for spoken language. TOF occurred among Korean signers, and specifically, Korean signers were more likely to retrieve a target sign’s hand shape, location and orientation than to retrieve its movement. The existence of TOFs supported a separation between semantic and phonological representations in Korean Sign Language. The link between meaning and phonology was activated automatically for high iconic properties of a sign. These results were consistent with those of previous research on American Sign Language.

keywords
Korean Sign Language, Phonological Parameter, Iconicity, TOF, Fluency in Sign Language, 수화, 수화소, 도상성, 손끝에 맴도는 현상, 수화숙련도

Reference

1.

Bosworth, R. G., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Effects of iconicity and semantic relatedness on lexical access in American sign language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1573-1581.

2.

Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

3.

Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204-223.

4.

Casey, S., Emmorey, K., & Larrabee, H. (2012). The effects of learning American Sign Language on co-speech gesture. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 677-686.

5.

Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access:Evidence from the “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343.

6.

de Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.; C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1915).

7.

Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88-96.

8.

Inoue, T. (2006). Memory in deaf signers and embodied cognition of sign languages. Japanese Psychological Research, 48, 223-232.

9.

Korean Sign Language Dictionary (2016). http://sldict.korean.go.kr/front/main/main.do

10.

Kreiner, H., & Degani, T. (2015). Tip-of-the-tongue in a second language: The effects of brief first-language exposure and long-term use. Cognition, 137, 106-114.

11.

Liddell, S., & Johnson, R. (1989). American Sign Language:The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64, 197-277.

12.

Lim, J. R. (2018). The iconic aspects and semantic properties of Korean sign language. The Journal of Korean Language and Literature Education, 68, 63-88.

13.

Melvin(2013). The effects of learning american sign language on college students' spatial cognition (Unpublished master's thesis). Wesleyan University.

14.

Permiss, P., Thomson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1-15.

15.

Sandler, W. (2012). Dedicated gestures in the emergence of sign language. Gesture, 12, 265-307.

16.

Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Scheider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime Reference Guide. Psychology Software Tools, Inc.; Pittsburgh, PA: 2002.

18.

Stokoe, W. (1991). Semantic phonology. Sign Language Studies, 71, 107-114.

19.

Supalla, T., Hauser, P. C., & Bavelier, D. (2014). Reproducing American sign language sentences: Cognitive scaffolding in working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-16.

20.

Thompson, R, Emmorey, K., & Gollan, T. H. (2005). ‘‘tip of the fingers’’ experiences by deaf signers. Insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon. Psychological Science, 16, 856-860.

21.

Thompson, R, Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). The link between form and meaning in American sign language:Lexical processing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 550-557.

22.

Thompson, R, Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). The link between form and meaning in American sign language:Lexical processing effects in a phonological decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1017-1027.

23.

Thompson, R, Vinson, D., Woll, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). The road to language learning is iconic: Evidence from British sign language. Psychological Science, 23, 1443–1448.

24.

Yoon, B. C. (2005).An analytic review of research on sign language in Korea. The Journal of Special Education:Theory and Practice, 6, 19-36.

25.

Yu. J. S., & Kim, W. S. (2013). The cheremes characteristics of deaf children in nonsign repetition. Special Education Research, 12, 227-246.

26.

Wilcox, S. (2002). The iconic mapping of space and time in signed languages. Advances in Consciousness Research, 41, 255-282.

27.

Wilcox, S. (2004). Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive linguistics, 15, 119-147.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy