바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.4
Citation Share

Independent Effects of the Confronting and the Emotion on Face Feature Judgment

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2020, v.32 no.4, pp.329-344
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.4.004


& (2020). Independent Effects of the Confronting and the Emotion on Face Feature Judgment. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 32(4), 329-344, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.4.004
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

It was investigated whether the effects due to facing types were related to the automatic perceptual process and whether emotion could be involved in it. We looked into what the kind of relationship was between facial emotion and types of facing in the object-feature comparison task performance. In experiment 1, the gender identification task, and in experiments 2 and 3, the emotion identification tasks were used for object-feature comparison. In experiments 1 and 2, responses were the fastest under the facing each other condition, and the slowest under the facing away condition, opposite to the hypothesis that the automatic grouping process slows down identifying the individual features. We conjectured that the distance difference created by two facing conditions, facing each other vs. facing away, might cause the performance difference. In experiment 3, the distance between the two faces was controlled, so that the analysis was made on the trial conditions with the same facial distance. It was obtained that the response time under the facing each other condition was slower than facing away condition. And there was no interaction significantly between emotion and facing types, but only the main effects of facing types and emotions were significant, separately. It is suggested that the explanation that the automatic grouping process due to confronted faces bind individuals into groups results in slowing down the identifying features process, and is independent of facial emotion.

keywords
맞보기 효과, 정서, 사회적 결속, the confronted effect, emotion, social binding

Reference

1.

Amir, N., Najmi, S., Bomyea, J., & Burns, M. (2010). Disgust and anger in social anxiety. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 3, 3-10.

2.

Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27.

3.

Chun, J. W., Park, H. J., Kim, D. J., Kim, E, & Kim, J. J. (2017). Contribution of fronto-striatal regions to emotional valence and repetition under cognitive conflict. Brain Research, 1666, 48-57

4.

Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Sensation and Perception, 9th ed., Wadsworth: Cengage International.

5.

Green, C., & Hummel, J. E. (2006). Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1107-1119.

6.

Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917-924.

7.

Hong, L. & Nam, J.-H. (2020). The Effect of Confronted Animals in Size Comparison Task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 32, 101-110.

8.

Jung, E., Takahashi, K., Watanabe, K., de la Rosa, S., Butz, M. V., Bülthoff, H. H., & Meilinger, T. (2016). The influence of human body orientation on distance judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 217.

9.

Nam, J.-H., & Park, M. (2008). Asymmetric Effects of Cast Shadow Directions on Visual Search. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 20, 265-283.

10.

Papeo, L., Stein, T., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2017). The two-body inversion effect. Psychological science, 28(3), 369-379.

11.

Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635-647.

12.

Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1-2), 8-13.

13.

Rensink, R. & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The influence of cast shadows on visual search. Perception, 33, 1339-1358.

14.

Russel, R. (2009). A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics. Perception, 38(8), 1211-1219.

15.

Scott, I. M., Pound, N., Stephen, I. D., Clark, A. P., &Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010). Does Masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS one 5(10), e13585.

16.

Strachan, J. W., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2019). The role of emotion in the dyad inversion effect. PloS one, 14(7)e0219185.

17.

Sun, J. Y. & Perona, P. (1998). Where is the Sun? Nature Neuroscience, 1, 184-184.

18.

Sun, J., Yang, J.-W., Chong, S. C. (2017). The Effect of Emotional Valence of Stimuli and Emotional State of Observers on Distance Perception. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 29, 331-349.

19.

Vestner, T., Tipper, S. P., Hartley, T., Over, H., &Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2019). Bound together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1251-1268.

20.

Vo, M. L. H., & Herderson, J. M. (2009). Does Gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 1-15.

21.

Yang, J.-W. Chung, K., Chong, S. C. (2015). The Yonsei Face Database. Institute of Cognitive Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy