바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.19 No.1

Citation Share

다이나믹 접근법을 적용한 골프 퍼팅 학습의 역동적 특성연구

A Study of Dynamical Characteristics on Learning of the Golf Putting Using Dynamic Approach

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2007, v.19 no.1, pp.77-91
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2007.19.1.005
신미경 (군산대학교)
신미경. (2007). 다이나믹 접근법을 적용한 골프 퍼팅 학습의 역동적 특성연구. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 19(1), 77-91, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2007.19.1.005

초록

골프 퍼팅 학습의 역동적 특성에 대해 조사하기 위하여 다아나믹 접근법을 적용하여 편안한 상태(Comfor Mode; CM)집단과 표적(Target; TG)집단으로 나누어 다섯 회에 걸쳐 실험하였다. CM집단은 환경적 제한이 없는 상태에서 눈을 감고 편안한 상태에서 연습을 한 집단이고, TG집단은 목표거리가 주어지고 눈을 뜬 상태에서 연습을 한 집단이다. 실험의 결과는 실험 3일째에는 CM집단이 TG집단에 비해 수행이 더 정확하였으나, 이러한 차이는 학습이 반복되면서 실험 4, 5일째에는 사라짐을 발견하였다. 또한 실험 3, 4, 5일의 수행 간에 학습효과의 차이를 발견할 수 있었으며 연습이 거듭될수록 수행이 더 정확해 짐을 알 수 있었다. 이와 함께 실험 5일째에 어트랙터가 중간거리 조건에서 짧은거리와 긴거리 조건으로 바뀌는 자기형성이 일어난 것을 발견하였다. 실험의 결과는 골프 퍼팅 학습에 다이나믹 접근법의 주장이 적용됨을 보여주고 있다.

keywords
다이나믹 접근법, 본질적 역동성, 요구된 역동성, 자기형성, 어트랙터, 골프 퍼팅, dynamic appoach, intrinsic dynamics, required dynamics, self organization, attractor, golf putting

Abstract

For investigating the dynamic characteristics in learning of the golf putting, the present experiment was conducted from the perspective of the dynamic approach. At Day 1, CM group was instructed to practice putting comfortably under no environmental constraints with their eyes closed(intrinsic dynamics), and TG group was instructed to practice putting under the environmental constraints with their eyes open(required dynamics). The results showed that at Day 3, CM group was more accurate than TG group, however, this difference was vanished at Day 4, and Day 5 with increased practices. Also, there was the learning effect between Days, hence, the performance became more accurate at Day 5. The results, also, showed that at Day 5, the attractor state was changed from the Middle distance condition to the Short, and the Long distance conditions, therefore, indicated the phenomenon of 'self organization'. In sum, the dynamic characteristics in learning of the golf putting was well explained by the dynamic approach.

keywords
다이나믹 접근법, 본질적 역동성, 요구된 역동성, 자기형성, 어트랙터, 골프 퍼팅, dynamic appoach, intrinsic dynamics, required dynamics, self organization, attractor, golf putting

참고문헌

1.

신미경 (2006). 다이나믹 접근법을 적용한 골프 퍼팅 분석. 한국스포츠리서치, 17(5), 205-214.

2.

Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

3.

Haken, H. (1983). Advanced synergetics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

4.

Haken, H. & Wunderlin, A. (1990). Synergetics and its paradigm of self-organization in biological systems. In H. T. A. Whiting, O. G. Meijer & P. C. W. Wiringen (Eds.), The Natural Physical Approach to Movement Control. 1-36.

5.

Kelso, J. A. S. (1984). Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, integrative and Comparative Physiology, 15: R1000-R1004

6.

Kelso, J. A. S. (1990). Phase transitions: Foundation of behavior. In H. Haken & M. Stadler (Eds.), Synergetics of cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 249-268.

7.

Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). Elementary coordination dynamics. In S. Swinnen, H. Heuer, J. Massion, & P. Casaer (Eds.), Interlimb coordination: Neural, Dynamical, and cognitive constraints (pp. 301-318). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

8.

Kelso, J. A. S., Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (1986). Nonlinear phase transitions in coordinated biological motion: critical fluctuation, Physics letter A, 118(6), 279-284.

9.

Kugler, P. N., Kelso, J. A. S., & Turvey, M. T. (1982). On the control of naturally developing systems. In J. A. S. Kelso & J.E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination (pp. 5-78). New Work: Wiley.

10.

Kugler, P. N., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

Lee, T. D., & Swinnen, S. P. (1993). Three legacies of Bryan and Harter: Automaticity, variability and change in skilled performance. In J. L. Starkes & Allard (Eds.), Cognitive issues in motor expertise (pp. 295-315). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

12.

Lee, T., Swinnen, S. & Verschueren, S. (1995). Relative phase alterations during bimanual skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27 (3), 263-274.

13.

Prigogine, I. & Stenger, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. New York, NY; Bantam books.

14.

Schöner, G., Haken, H., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1986). A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 53, 247-257.

15.

Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988a). A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination: Ⅰ. Relative phase dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 58, 71-80.

16.

Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988b). A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination: Ⅱ. Component oscillator dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 58, 81-89.

17.

Schöner, G. & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988c). Dynamical patterns of biological coordination: Theoretical strategy and new results. In J. A. S. Kelso, A.J. Mandell, & M.F. Schlesinger (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in complex systems (pp. 77-102). Singapore: World Scientific.

18.

Sim, M., Shaw, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1997). Intrinsic and required dynamics of a simple bat-ball skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1, 101-115.

19.

Sim, M., Sullivan, J., Shaw, R. E., & Carello, Claudia (1988). A comfort mode analysis of a simple accuracy skill. Paw Review, 3 (2), 35-38.

20.

Smoll, F. L., & Schutz, R. W. (1982). Accuracy of rhythmic motor behavior in response to preferred and non-preferred tempos. Jounal of Human Movement Studies, 8, 123-138.

21.

Sparrow, W. A. (1983). The efficiency of skilled behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 237-261.

22.

Sparrow, W. A., & Irizarry-Lopez, V. M. (1987). Mechanical efficiencies and metabolic cost as measures of learning a novel gross motor task.. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 240-264.

23.

Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. American psychologist, 45, 938-953.

24.

Zannon, P. & Kelso, J. A. S. (1992). Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 403-421.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책