바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.22 No.2
Citation Share

우리글 읽기에서 본 단어 습득연령 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구

The effect of age of acquisition on fixation durations in Korean reading: An eye tracking study

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.2, pp.129-142
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.001
윤소정 (서울대학교)
고성룡 (서울대학교)
윤소정, & 고성룡. (2010). 우리글 읽기에서 본 단어 습득연령 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(2), 129-142, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.001
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

이 연구에서는 자연스러운 우리글 읽기에서 단어의 습득연령 효과를 살펴보았다. 습득연령에 관한 입장은 연령 효과가 빈도로 모두 설명된다고 주장하는 입장과 그렇지 않다는 입장이 있다. 전자를 대표하는 Zevin과 Seidenberg(2002, 2004)는 습득연령이 빈도와는 독립적인 요인이라는 근거를 제시한 연구들이 빈도를 통제할 때 어린 시절에 쓰인 빈도를 포함한 누적 빈도를 쓰지 않았다는 점을 지적하면서 누적 빈도를 통제하면 습득연령 효과가 사라진다고 주장하였다. 우리말에는 누적 빈도 자료가 없기 때문에 이 연구에서는 누적 빈도에 가까우리라 판단되는 주관적 빈도를 이용하여 자연스런 우리글 읽기에서 습득연령 효과가 나타나는지 안구운동 추적으로 살펴보았다. 주관적 빈도를 통제하고 습득연령을 조작한 실험 1에서는 단일 고정 시간(눈이 어절에 단 한 번 고정했을 때의 고정시간), 첫 고정 시간(눈이 어절에서 처음 머문 고정의 고정시간), 주시 시간(눈이 어절에 머물기 시작한 때부터 어절을 벗어날 때까지 이루어진 고정들의 시간 합)에서 습득연령 효과가 관찰되었으나, 습득연령을 통제하고 주관적 빈도를 조작한 실험 2에서는 단일 고정 시간, 첫 고정 시간, 주시 시간에서 빈도 효과가 관찰되지 않았다. 이 연구 결과는 습득연령이 단어재인에 중요한 변인임을 보여주며, 또한 빈도와는 독립적인 변인일 가능성을 시사한다.

keywords
Age of acquisition, Korean, cumulative frequency, eye movement, 습득연령, 한국어, 누적빈도, 안구운동

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of age of acquisition(AoA) on skilled reading using eyetracking. Although many studies have suggested that AoA would affect the performance of skilled readers, the issue of AoA in reading has been a controversial and much disputed subject within the field of psycholinguistics. Zevin & Seidenberg(2002, 2004) have presented an important methodological critique of previous studies of AoA effects. They argued that previous studies would have not found AoA effects if cumulative frequency had been controlled adequately. The main issue addressed in this paper is whether AoA effect would be found when subjective frequency, which is assumed to replace cumulative frequency, is controlled. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences with early and late acquired words controlled on SF. Single fixation duration, first fixation duration, and gaze duration of early acquired words were shorter than those of late acquired words. In Experiment 2, other participants also read sentences with high and low frequency words controlled on AoA. There was no frequency effect for single fixation duration, first fixation duration, and gaze duration. Results from these two experiments demonstrate that AoA affects eye fixation durations during sentence reading.

keywords
Age of acquisition, Korean, cumulative frequency, eye movement, 습득연령, 한국어, 누적빈도, 안구운동

참고문헌

1.

고성룡, 홍효진, 윤소정, 조병환 (2008). 우리글 명사 어절에서의 단어 빈도 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 20(1), 21-37

2.

권효원, 김선경, 이혜원 (2006). 한글단어재인에서 단어빈도와 의미점화효과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 18(3), 203-220.

3.

박태진 (2003). 한국어 다어의 주관적 빈도 추정치 및 단어 재인에 미치는 빈도 효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 5(2), 349-366.

4.

윤소정 (2009). 우리말 단어에서 습득연령 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구, 서울대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문

5.

이광오 (1993). 한글 단어인지과정에서 표기법이 심성어휘집의 구조와 검색에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 5, 26-39.

6.

Balota, D., & Chumbly, J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 340-357.

7.

Balota, D., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,9838 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 639-647.

8.

Balota, D., Yap, M. J. & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In Traxler, J. M., & Gernsbacher, M.(Eds.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 285-376. London: ELSEVIER.

9.

Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208-216.

10.

Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Meot, A., & Fayol, M. (2001). Age-of-acquisition and word frequency in the lexical decision task: Further evidence from the French language.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 20, 401-443.

11.

Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15, 208-216.

12.

Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-Acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12 563-576.

13.

Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., & Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 650-658.

14.

Ducan, C. P. (1970). Thinking of a word under different retrieval constraints. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 356-361.

15.

Forster, K., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.

16.

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 267-283.

17.

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999a). Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming. Cognition, 73, B27-B36.

18.

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999b). Age of acquisition, word frequency and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 592-602.

19.

Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words, Behavior research methods & Instrumentation, 12(4), 395-427.

20.

Hall, J. f. (1954). Learning as a function of word-frequency. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 138-140.

21.

Johnson, D. M. (1966). Solution of anagrams. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 371-384.

22.

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 6099

23.

Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Age-of-acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition, 13, 789-845.

24.

Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providennce, R. I.: Brown University Press, 1967.

25.

Laws, K. R., Leeson, V. C., & Gale, T. M. (2002). The effect of "masking" on picture naming. Cortex, 38, 137-148.

26.

Lloyd, K. E. (1964). Short-term retention as a function of word frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 286-289.

27.

Martin, J. G. (1964). Associative strength and word frequency in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 317-320.

28.

Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys(Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

29.

Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., & Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory and Cognition, 20, 705-714.

30.

Morrison, C. M. & Ellis, A. W. (1995). roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision, Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 116-133

31.

Pind, J., & Tryggvadottir, H. B. (2002). Determinants of picture naming in Icelandic. Sandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 221-226.

32.

Rayner, K. (1998) Eye Movements in reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.

33.

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A.(1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.

34.

Rosenberg, S., Coyle, P. J., & Porter, W. L. (1966). Recall of adverbs as a function of the frequency of their adjective roots. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 75-76.

35.

Saltz, E, & Modigliani, v. (1970). Meaningfulness and short-term memory: Test of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 209-312.

36.

Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.

37.

Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1282-1291.

38.

Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(A), 822-848.

39.

Winnick, W. A., & Kressel, K. (1965). Tachistoscopic recognition thresholds, paired-associate learning, and free recall as a function of abstractness-concreteness and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 163-168.

40.

Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29

41.

Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 31-38

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책