바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.2
Citation Share

The Frequency and Length Effect on eye fixation in Korean reading

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.2, pp.215-232
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.006




& (2010). The Frequency and Length Effect on eye fixation in Korean reading. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(2), 215-232, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study investigated the frequency and length effect on eye fixation in Korean reading using eye-tracking. In study 1, the eye movement data collected during reading a novel were analyzed with regression analysis on a word cluster(eojeol). Frequency predicted first fixation time, single fixation time and gaze duration on eojeols and length predicted single fixation time and gaze duration. However, interaction between two variables, frequency and length, did not predict any fixation times. In study 2, the experiment factorially designed with word frequency and length was carried out to compensate for a limitation of study 1, using eojeol items, not words. First fixation time and single fixation time were shorter in high-frequency words than in low-frequency words. On gaze duration, there were significant main effects of word frequency and length, and also the interaction between them. In addition, it was found that there was a reverse length effect on the next word of the target. The results from study 1 and 2 were discussed in the context of models of eye movement control in reading.

keywords
word frequency, word length, eye movement, fixation time, 낱말빈도, 낱말길이, 안구운동, 고정시간

Reference

1.

고성룡, 윤낙영 (2007). 우리 문장 읽기에서 안구 운동의 특성: 어절 길이, 낱말 빈도 및 착지점 관련 효과. 인지과학, 18(4), 325-350.

2.

고성룡, 홍효진, 윤소정, 조병환 (2008). 우리글 명사 어절에서 낱말 빈도 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 20(1), 21-37.

3.

박태진 (2003). 자료: 한국어 낱말의 주관적 빈도 추정치 및 낱말 재인에 미치는 빈도 효과. 한국실험심리학회지 실험 및 인지, 15(2), 349-366.

4.

연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도. 연세대학교.

5.

윤낙영, 고성룡 (2009). 난이도가 다른 덩이글 읽기에서의 안구운동 양상. 인지과학, 20(3), 291-307.

6.

이광오 (1993). 한글 단어인지과정에서 표기법이 심성어휘집의 구조와 검색에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 5, 26-39.

7.

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.

8.

Balota D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.

9.

Balota D. A., Cortese, Sergent-Marshall, Spieler. & Melvin J. Yap (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283-316.

10.

Balota, D. A., Ferraro, F. R., Connor, L. T. (1991). on the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In: P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The Psychology of Word Meanings, 187-218.

11.

Broadbent, D. E. (1967). Lexical representations of derivational relations. In: M. Aranoff, & M. Kean(Eds), Juncture, 37-55, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood(Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, 125-148, Oxford, England: Elsevier.

13.

Chumbley, J. I., & Balota, D. A. (1984). A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 12, 590-606.

14.

Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.

15.

Foster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1109-1115.

16.

Foster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.

17.

Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.

18.

Hutchinson, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A micro-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 785-813.

19.

Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & psychophysics, 40, 431-439.

20.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.

21.

Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of pst, present, and future words on fixation duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1359(1), 12-35.

22.

McGinnies, E., Comer, P. B. & Lacey, O. L. (1952). Visual-recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 65-69.

23.

Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 16, 268-281.

24.

Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: D. Besner, & G. Humphreys (Eds), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, 236-264, Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

25.

New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 45-52.

26.

Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.

27.

Pollatsek A., Juhasz B., Reichle & Rayner K. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 726-750.

28.

Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A., (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & psychophysics, 40, 123-130.

29.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.

30.

Rayner, K., Ashby, J. A., Pollatsek A. & Reichle, E.D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732.

31.

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.

32.

Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements. Vision Research, 16, 829-837.

33.

Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 163-172.

34.

Rayner, K., Sereno & Raney (1996). Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol.22, No.5, 1188-1200.

35.

Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.

36.

Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. & O;Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation duration reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.

37.

Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.

38.

Yap, M. J. & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502-529.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy