바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.3
Citation Share

Attention deficits in adults with ADHD tendency using Change Blindness Tasks

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.3, pp.355-368
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.3.006


& (2010). Attention deficits in adults with ADHD tendency using Change Blindness Tasks. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(3), 355-368, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.3.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Change blindness is a failure to detect subtle changes in a series of scenes, and the phenomenon has been thought to be based on inattention or attention deficits. This study examined whether a change blindness task could be a useful tools for discriminating adult ADHD from normal adults. Participants performed a flicker-dot task, a simultaneous-dot task, a continuous performance teak, and a CAARS-K ADHD rating scale. In order to examine which task index (i.e., mean response time, standard deviation of response time, and accuracy) may reveal attention deficit, correlation analyses were conducted. As results, in flicker-dot task, there were almost no significant correlations between task indices and ADHD scales. In contrast, in simultaneous-dot task, response time and accuracy were negatively correlated to nearly every ADHD scales. In addition, the result of a discriminant analysis showed that indices from the simultaneous-dot task have more discrimination accuracy than those from the continuous performance task. These results suggest that change blindness task may be useful in revealing attention deficits in adults with ADHD.

keywords
변화맹시, 성인 ADHD, 순차제시과제, 동시제시과제, 연속수행과제, 주의력 결함, Change blindness, adult ADHD, Flicker-dot task, Simultaneous-dot task, Continuous performance task, Attention deficit

Reference

1.

곽지은, 정혜원, 곽호완. (2008). 웹 기반 심리 평가의 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 20(4), 321-337.

2.

곽호완, 장문선. (2007). 성인 ADHD 경향성에 대한 웹기반 실험신경심리연구: 회귀억제, 스트룹 및 내생-외생 주의과제. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(4). 1039-1055.

3.

고승희, 신민섭, 홍강의. (1996). KEDI-WISC와 TOVA를 이용한 소아정신과 장애별 주의력 문제와 인지적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 15(1), 165-178.

4.

김호영, 이주영, 조상수, 이임순, 김지혜. (2005). 한국판 Conners 성인 ADHD 평정척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구: 대학생 표본을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 24(2), 171-185.

5.

정진영, 장문선, 곽호완. (2008). 성인 ADHD 성향군의 회귀억제와 반응억제 결함. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(1), 179-196.

6.

Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition sustained, attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94.

7.

Barkley, R. A. (2006). Attention-dificit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment(3rdf ed.). New York: Guilford.

8.

Cohen, A. L., & Shapiro, A. K. (2007). Exploring the performance differences on the flicker task and the Conners' Continuous Performance Test in adults with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11(1), 49-63.

9.

Conners, C. K., Erhadt, D., & Sparrow, E. (1999). Manual for the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

10.

Epstein, J. N., Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., & Erhadt, D. (1998). Continuous performance test results of adult with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 155-168.

11.

Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Vancouver studies in cognitive science: Vol. 2: Perception (pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Kwak, H.-W, Chang, M.-S, Kim, G, Cho, M. K, Sohn, Y.-J, & Lee, S. I, (2009). Change blindness in adults with ADHD tendency. Poseter presented at 73rd Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association(August 26, Kyoto, Japan).

13.

Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 501-506.

14.

Rensink, R.A. (2000). When good observers go bad: Change blindness, inattentional blindness, and visual experience. Psyche, 6(9).

15.

Rensink, R.A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology. 53, 245-277.

16.

Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368-373.

17.

Riccio, C. A., Reynolds, C. R., & Lowe, P. A. (2001). Clinical application of continuous performance test: Measuring attention and impulsive responding in children and adult. New York: Wiley & Sons.

18.

Scott-Brown, K. C., Baker, M. R., & Orbach, H. S. (2000). Comparison blindness. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 253-267.

19.

Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.

20.

Simons, D. J. & Levin, D.T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261-267.

21.

Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.

22.

Solanto, M. V., Etefia, K., & Marks, D. J. (2004). The utility of self report measures and the continuous performance test in the diagnosis of ADHD in adult. CNS Spectrums, 9, 649-659.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy