바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A comparison of hypotheses: the residual capacity against the attention control failure on the perception of nontargets

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.3, pp.405-417
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.3.009



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Two experiments pitted the residual capacity hypothesis against the failure of attention control hypothesis regarding the perception of nontargets in a Rock & Gutman (1981) incidental learning task (H.-J. Kim & J.-O. Kim, 2010; H.-U. Cho & J.-O. Kim, 2010). Rock and Gutman demonstrated that inattentional nontargets were never recognized. Kim and his colleagues reported the opposite results when participants' perceptual intention regarding the target was systematically varied. The present study tested the predictions of those two hypotheses by varying the order of instructions (Experiment 1) or by presenting participants with two overlapped shapes as a recognition item (Experiment 2). The pattern of our results supports the residual capacity hypothesis while rejecting the failure of attention control hypothesis.

keywords
무주의 형태 지각, 잔여용량설, 주의통제 실패설, 약호화 지시, perception of nontarget, residual capacity hypothesis, failure of attention control hypothesis, encoding instructions

Reference

1.

김희정, 김정오 (2010). 낯선 형태에 대한 연상이 비표적 형태의 지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22, 161-176.

2.

조현욱, 김정오 (2010). 표적 형태의 내적/외적 구조의 약호화가 무주의 형태의 지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22, 59-73.

3.

Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.

4.

Rock, I & Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 275-285

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology