바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

편측성 준비 전위(lateralized readiness potential): 대측 통제를 이용한 운동 관련 전위에 관하여

Lateralized Readiness Potential: On the Movement-Related Potential That Uses the Contralateral Organization of Motor Control

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2012, v.24 no.4, pp.335-355
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.4.003
신은삼 (연세대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

신경계의 운동 체계가 대측적으로 조직화되어 있음을 이용하여 개발된 편측성 준비 전위(LRP: lateralized readiness potential)는 사건관련전위(ERP: event-related potential)에서 도출되는 특수 파형으로서 그것의 높은 시간적 해상도를 바탕으로 심리 시간분석법(mental chronometry)적 연구 발전에 큰 공헌을 해왔다. 특히 인간의 정보처리 양식이 동시적이고 연속적이라는 증거를 제공하면서 그 유용성을 확장해왔다. 본 논문에서는 LRP의 발달 배경, 도출 원리, 종류, 분석 및 검증 방법을 개관하였고 LRP를 이용한 응용 연구 또한 소개하였다.

keywords
사건관련전위, 대측 통제, 정보처리, 편측성 준비 전위, 심리 시간분석법, event-related potentials, contralateral control, information processing, lateralized readiness potential, mental chronometry

Abstract

The lateralized readiness potential (LRP) that uses the contralateral organization of motor control is derived from event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Because of the high temporal resolution of the technique, it has been a beneficial research method investigating mental chronometry in human information processing. In particular, studies using the LRP have shown evidence that information flows continuously and concurrently in the brain. In this review, I introduced the background of the LRP emergence, basic principles behind its arithmetic computations, LRP types, data analysis and statistical tests. Finally, I reviewed studies in which the LRP was used and applied for various purposes, and suggested that the LRP can contribute to expanding the scope of brain research in the country.

keywords
사건관련전위, 대측 통제, 정보처리, 편측성 준비 전위, 심리 시간분석법, event-related potentials, contralateral control, information processing, lateralized readiness potential, mental chronometry

참고문헌

1.

Arezzo, J., & Vaughan, H. G. (1975). Cortical potentials associated with voluntary movements in the monkey. Brain Research, 88, 99-104.

2.

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104-128.

3.

Bartholow, B. D., Riordan, M., Saults, J. S., & Lust, S. A. (2009). Psychophysiolgical evidence of response conflict and strategic control of responses in affective priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 655-666.

4.

Brunia, C. H. M., & Van den Bosch, W. E. J. (1984). Movement-related slow potentials: I. A contrast between finger and foot movemtns in right-handed subject. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 515-527.

5.

Carrillo-de-la-Peňa, M. T., Lastra-Barreira, C., & Galdo-Álvarez, S. (2006). Limb (hand vs. foot) and response conflict have similar effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded during motor imagery and overt execution. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 635-643.

6.

Coles, M. G. H., & Gratton, G. (1986). Cognitive psychophysiology and the study of states and processes. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and human information processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof, pp. 409- 424.

7.

Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.

8.

Deecke, L., Weinberg, H., & Brickett, P. (1982). Magnetic fields of the human brain accompanying voluntary movements. Bereitschaftsmagnetfeld. Experimental Brain Research, 48, 144-148.

9.

de Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.

10.

de Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. L., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.

11.

DeSoto, M. C., Fabiani, M., Geary, D. C., & Gratton, G. (2001). When in doubt, do it both ways: Brain evidence of simultaneous activation of conflicting motor responses in a spatial Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 523-536.

12.

Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.

13.

Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64, 7-26.

14.

Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.

15.

Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Federmeider, K. (2007). Event-related brain potentials. In J. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd Ed.) (pp.85- 119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Gerbrandt, L. K., Goff, M. R., & Smith, D. B. (1973). Distribution of the human average movement potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 461-474.

17.

Gong, D., Hu, J., & Yao, D. (2012). Partial information can be transmitted in auditory channel: Inferences from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychophysiology, 49, 499-503.

18.

Gong, D., Ma, W., Hu, J., Hu, Q., Lai, Y., & Yao, D. (2012). The flexibility of partial information transmission in the auditory channel: The role of perceptual discriminability. Psychophysiology, 49, 1394-1400.

19.

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.

20.

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.

21.

Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2001). Shedding light on brain function: The event-related optical signal. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 357-363.

22.

Hermans, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 515-533.

23.

Hermans, D., Smeesters, D., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Affective priming for associatively unrelated primes and targets. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 191-212.

24.

Hsieh, S., & Yu, Y. T. (2003). Switching between simple response-sets: interferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 228-237.

25.

Hsieh, S., & Liu, L. C. (2005). The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry- over effect? Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 165- 175.

26.

Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2006). Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 398, 91-96.

27.

Ilan, A. B., & Miller, J. (1998). On the temporal relations between memory scanning and response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1501-1520.

28.

Jentzsch, I., & Leuthold, H. (2002). Advance movement preparation of eye, foot and hand: A comparative study using movement-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 201-217.

29.

Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicœur, P., & Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A component of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250-274.

30.

Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1996). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.

31.

Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialanderungen bei Wilkurbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftpotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflugers Archives fur die gesammte Physiologie, 248, 1-17.

32.

Kutas, M., & Donchin, E. (1980). preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potential. Brain Research, 202, 95-115.

33.

Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (2004). Preparing for action: Inferences from CNV and LRP. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 77-88.

34.

Low, K. A., Miller, J., & Vierck, E. (2002). Response slowing in Parkinson’s disease: A psychophysiological analysis of premotor and motor processes. Brain, 125, 1980-1994.

35.

Masaki, H., Takasawa, N., & Yamazaki, K. (2000). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus- reponse compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology, 37, 464-472.

36.

Miller, J. O., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temportal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.

37.

Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99-115.

38.

Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Schwarz, W. (2009). Why jackknifing yields good latency estimates. Psychophysiology, 46, 300-312.

39.

Okada, Y. C., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. (1982). Magnetic fields of the human sensory-motor cortex. International Journal of Neurophysiology, 17, 33-38.

40.

Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.

41.

Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

42.

Schmitt, B. M., Münte, T. F., Kutas, M. (2000). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology, 37, 473-484.

43.

Schmitt, B. M., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Kutas, M., & Münte, T. F. (2001). An electrophysiological analysis of the time course of conceptual and syntactic encoding during tacit picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 510-522.

44.

Shin, E., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2004). Evidence of partial response activation in a memory-search task. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 281-293.

45.

Shin, E., Wan, X. I., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Lleras, A. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials. Psychophysiology, 45, 804-811.

46.

Triesman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.

47.

Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.

48.

Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. O. (2001). Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology, 38, 816-827.

49.

van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 787-806.

50.

van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280, 572-574.

51.

Vaughan, H. G., Jr., Costa, L. D., & Ritter, W.(1968). Topography of the human motor potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 25, 1-10.

52.

Walter, W. C., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.

53.

Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2007). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and metrical encoding in Chinese speech production. Neuroscience, 147, 986-995.

54.

Zhang, Q., Damian, M. F., & Yang, Y. (2007). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of tonal and orthographic encoding in Chinese speech production. Brain Research, 1184, 234-244.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물