바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

중전두피질 비대칭성이 정서사진 자극에 대한 사건유발전위에 미치는 영향

Influence of Midfrontal Brain Asymmetry on Event Related Potential to Affective Pictures

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2013, v.25 no.4, pp.463-482
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2013.25.4.005
정봉교 (영남대학교)

초록

본 연구는 중전두피질 비대칭성(FBA)의 개인차가 정서사진 자극에 대한 사건유발전위에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 실험참가자들은 먼저 정적 및 부적 정서척도(PANAS)와 행동억제 및 행동 활성화(BIS/BAS) 척도에 응답을 하였다. 그리고 그들은 안정기 EEG 측정을 받은 다음, 긍정적 사진, 부정적 사진 및 중립 사진이 동일하게 낮은 빈도로 제시되고 통제 패턴자극이 높은 빈도로 제시되는 oddball 패러다임에서 EEG 측정을 받았다. 정서자극은 통제자극에 비해 유의하게 높은 사건유발전위(ERP)를 유발하였다. 안정기 좌측 중전두 활성화 집단은 우측 중전두 활성화 집단에 비해 긍정적 자극에 대해 높은 P300과 후기 양성전위(LPP) 그리고 높은 긍정적 정서와 접근동기를 보인 반면에, 부정적 자극에 대해 낮은 P300 그리고 낮은 회피 동기를 나타내었다. FBA, BAS 및 BIS는 ERP와 유의한 상관을 나타내었다. 위계적 회귀 분석에서 FBA는 긍정적 자극에 대한 높은 P300과 LPP를 그리고 부정적 자극에 대해서는 낮은 LPP를 예측해 주는 반면에, BIS는 부정적 자극에 대한 높은 P300과 LPP를 예측해준다. 본 연구의 결과는 정서자극 처리에 있어서 FBA의 기제에 대한 특질 동기적 방향 가설이 정서가 가설보다 더 적절할 가능성을 시사한다.

keywords
FBA, event related potential, BAS, BIS, PA, NA, 중전두피질 비대칭성, 사건유발전위, 접근 동기, 회피 동기, 긍정적 정서, 부정적 정서

Abstract

This research examined whether midfrontal EEG asymmetry(FBA) influenced event related potential(ERP) to affective stimuli. Participants completed both Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS) and behavioral inhibition system and behavioral activation system(BIS/BAS) scales. Following resting FBA measure, ERPs were recorded while participants viewed International Affective System(IAPS) stimuli. Positive, negative and neutral pictures were used as infrequently occurring target stimuli and control pattern stimuli were used as frequent standard stimuli in oddball paradigm.. The P300 and late positive potential(LPP) components of the ERPs elicited by three types of affective pictures and control stimuli were analysed. Affective pictures elicited significantly higher ERPs relative to control stimuli. Compared to the right midfrontal activation group, the left midfrontal activation group exhibited higher ERPs to positive pictures and higher PA and BAS, but lower ERPs to negative pictures and lower BIS. FBA, BAS and BIS are significantly correlated with ERP components. In hierarchical regression analysis, FBA predicted higher ERPs to positive pictures and lower ERPs to negative pictures whereas BIS predicted higher ERPs to negative pictures. This results suggest that the trait motivational direction hypothesis is more plausible than the valence hypothesis to explain the mechanisms of frontal brain asymmetry in processing emotional stimuli.

keywords
FBA, event related potential, BAS, BIS, PA, NA, 중전두피질 비대칭성, 사건유발전위, 접근 동기, 회피 동기, 긍정적 정서, 부정적 정서

참고문헌

1.

김교헌, 김원식 (2001). 한국판 행동활성화 및 행동억제체계(BAS/BIS) 척도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6, 19-37.

2.

정봉교 (2007). 전두피질 비대칭성, 긍정적 정서 및 접근 동기. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 19, 127-147.

3.

정봉교, 윤병수 (2001). 전뇌 α 파 활동성의 반구 비대칭성과 정동유형. 한국심리학회지: 생물 및 생리, 13, 71-81.

4.

Allen, J. J. B. & Klein, J. P. (2004). Frontal EEG asymmetry, emotion and psychopathology: The first, and the next, twenty-five years. Biological Psychology, 67, 1-5.

5.

Amodio, D. M., Master, S. L., Yee, C. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology, 45, 11-19.

6.

Balconi, M. B., Falbo, L., & Conte, V. A. (2012). BIS and BAS correlates with psychophysiological and cortical response systems during aversive and appetitive emotional stimuli processing. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 218-231.

7.

Black, E. W. (1975). Unilateral brain lesion and MMPI performance: A preliminary study. Perception and Motor Skill, 40, 87-93.

8.

Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46, 1-11.

9.

Cano, M. E., Class, Q. A., & Polich, J. (2009). Affective valence, stimulus attributes, and P300: Color vs. black/white and normal vs. scrambled images. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 17-24.

10.

Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.

11.

Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (2003). Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. Psychophysiology, 40, 106- 114.

12.

Cunningham, W. A., Espinet, S. D., DeYoung, C. G., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Attitudes to the right and left: Frontal ERP asymmetries associated with stimulus valence and processing goals. Neuroimage, 28, 827-834.

13.

Davidson, R. J. (1992). Emotion and affective style: Hemispheric substrates. Psychological Science, 3, 39-43.

14.

Davidson, R. J. (1998). Anterior electrophysiological asymmetries, emotion, and depression: Conceptual and methodological conundrums. Psychophysiology, 35, 607-614.

15.

Davidson, R. J. (2002). Anxiety and affective style: Role of prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 68-80.

16.

Delplanque, S., Lavoie, M. E., Hot, P., Silvert, L., & Sequeira, H. (2004). Modulation of cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related potentials in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 356, 1-4.

17.

Donchin, E. & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Science, 11, 355-372.

18.

Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111-116.

19.

Forti, D. & Hajcak, G. (2008). Deconstructing reappraisal: Descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 977-988.

20.

Gable, P. A. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Relative left frontal activation to appetitive stimuli considering the role of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 45, 275-278.

21.

Gable, P. A. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Postauricular reflex responses to pictures varying in valence and arousal. Psychophysiology, 46, 487-490.

22.

Gable, P. A. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The effect of low vs. high approach-motivated positive affect on memory for peripherally vs. centrally presented information. Emotion, 10, 599-603.

23.

Gable, P. A. & Poole, B. D. (2012). Influence of trait behavioral inhibition and behavioral approach motivation systems on the LPP and frontal asymmetry to anger pictures. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Advance Access published November, 28, 2012.

24.

Gasparrini, W. G., Satz, P., Heilman, K., & Coolidge, F. L. (1978). Hemispheric asymmetries of affective processing as determined by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 41, 470-473.

25.

Gotlib, I. H., Ranganath, C., & Rosenfeld, J. P. (1998). Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and cognitive function. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 449-478.

26.

Graham, R. & Cabeza, R. (2001). Event-related potentials of recognizing happy and neutral faces. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 12, 245-248.

27.

Gray, J. A. (1994). Three fundamental emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp.243-247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

28.

Hagemann, D., Naumann, E., Thyer, J. F., & Bartussek, D. (2002). Does resting EEG asymmetry reflect a trait? An application of latent state-trait theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 619-641.

29.

Harmon-Jones, E. & Allen, J. J. B. (1997). Behavioral activation sensitivity and resting brain EEG asymmetry: Covariation of putative indicators related to risk for mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 159-163.

30.

Harmon-jones, E., Lueck, L., Fearn, M, & Harmon-Jones, C. (2006). The effect of personal relevance and approach-related action expectation on relative left frontal cortical activity. Psychological Science, 17, 434-440.

31.

Henrique, J. B. & Davidson, R. J. (1991). Left frontal hypoactivation in depression, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 535-545.

32.

Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.

33.

Keil, A., Bradley, M. M., Hauk, O., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., & Lang, P. J. (2002). Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. Psychophysiology, 39, 641-649.

34.

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

35.

Murphy, F. C., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Lawrence, A. D. (2003). Functional Neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 207-233.

36.

Nash, K., Inzlicht, M., & McGregor, I. (2012). Approach-related left prefrontal EEG asymmetry predicts muted error-related negativity. Biological Psychology, 91, 96-102.

37.

Nijs, I. M. T., Franken, I. H. A., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (2007). BIS/BAS sentivity and the P300 event-related brain potential. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 83-90.

38.

Peterson, C. K., Gable, P, Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Asymmetrical frontal ERPs, emotion, and behavioral approach/inhibition sensitivity. Social Neuroscience, 3, 113-124.

39.

Pizzagalli, D., Sharkman, A. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2003). The functional neuroimaging of human emotion: Asymmetrical contributions of cortical and subcortical circuitry. In K. Hugdahl & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The asymmetrical brain (pp.511-532). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

40.

Robinson, R. G. & Price, T. R. (1982). Post-stroke depressive disorders: A follow-up study of 103 patients. Stroke, 13, 635-641.

41.

Rozenkrantz, B., Olofsson, J. K., & Polish, J. (2008). Affective visual event-related potentials: Arousal, valence, and repetition effects for normal and distorted pictures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67, 114-123.

42.

Sabanetinelli, D., Lang, P. J., Keli, A., & Bradley, M. M. (2007). Emotional perception: Correlation of functional MRI and event related potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1085- 1091.

43.

Sackeim, H., Greenberg, M. S., Weiman, A. L., Gur, R. C., Hungerbuhler, J. P., & Geschwind, N. (1982). Hemispheric asymmetry in the expression of positive and negative emotions: Neurologic evidence. Archives of Neurology, 39, 210-218.

44.

Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257-261.

45.

Schupp, H. T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J. & Junghӧfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related potential studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 31-51.

46.

Sutton, S. K. & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204-210.

47.

Tomarken, A. J., Davidson, R. J., & Henriques, J. B. (1990). Resting frontal brain asymmetry predicts affective responses to films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 791-801.

48.

Tomarken, A. J., Davidson, R. J., Wheeler, R. E., & Doss, R. (1992). Individual differences in anterior brain asymmetry and fundamental dimensions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 676-687.

49.

Waldstein, S. R., Kop, W. J., Schmidt, L. A., Haufler, A. J., Krantz, D. S., & Fox, N. A. (2000). Frontal electrocortical and cardiovascular reactivity during happiness and anger. Biological Psychology, 55, 3-23.

50.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

51.

Wheeler, R. E., Davidson, R. J., & Tormarken, A. J. (1993). Frontal brain asymmetry and emotional reactivity: A biological substrate of affective style. Psychophysiology, 30. 82-89.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물