바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.4

Citation Share

조음억제행동이 작업기억체계의 수행에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Articulatory Suppression Behaviors on the Performance of Working Memory System

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2013, v.25 no.4, pp.483-516
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2013.25.4.006
정용석 (진주교육대학교)
김정오 (서울대학교)
박창호 (전북대학교)
정용석, 김정오, & 박창호. (2013). 조음억제행동이 작업기억체계의 수행에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 25(4), 483-516, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2013.25.4.006

초록

Baddeley(1986, 2000)의 음운루프 가설은 조음억제조건에서 제시양식(청각적, 시각적)에 따른 작업기억 수행 차이에 기초하여 상정되었다. 조음억제행동은 조음억제를 위해 사용되는 반복단어의 조음유형(외현적, 내현적), 조음속도, 점검 유무, 조음억제단어 등 여러 측면에서 차이가 나는데, 그 동안 이러한 차이가 주목받지 못했다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 변수들의 조작이 작업기억체계의 수행에 미치는 영향을 밝히고자 하였다. 실험결과, 조음억제행동은 조음유형, 조음속도, 점검유무, 조음억제단어에 따라 작업기억 수행에 미치는 영향이 다르게 나타났다. 외현적 조음억제가 내현적 조음억제보다, 느린 속도(비압축조건)가 빠른 속도(압축조건)보다, 점검 조건이 비점검조건보다 작업기억 수행에 부적 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 외현적 억제조건과 달리 내현적 억제조건에서는 조음속도에 따른 차이가 나타났으며, 느린 속도에서는 조음억제단어에 따라 작업기억 수행에 미치는 영향이 달랐다. 이러한 차이는 조음억제행동에 대한 자동화 혹은 주의 요구와 관련되는 것으로 해석되었다. 본 연구의 결과는 조음억제조건에서 조음장치에 따른 작업기억 수행차이가 없다는 음운루프 모형과 상반되며, 따라서 Baddeley의 작업기억 모형의 음운루프 가설을 재검토할 필요성이 제기된다.

keywords
작업기억, 조음억제행동, 중앙집행장치, 음운루프, 일화적 완충기, working memory, articulatory suppression behaviors, executive control system, phonological loop, episodic buffer

Abstract

Baddeley(1986, 2000) proposed a working memory model which is composed of the executive control system, the visuospatial sketchpad, and the phonological loop. In studying the nature of the phonological loop, a variety of articulatory suppression behaviors have been applied in experiments, but their effects have not been intensively investigated. This study tried to probe effects of articulatory suppression behaviors, especially on working memory performances. Subvocal and overt speech forms, two speeds of rehearsal (articulation), presence or absence of suppression monitoring, and several kinds of suppression words were contrasted while participants tried to remember memory items auditorily presented. Working memory performances were measured by the memory span (Exp. 1) and the number of correctly recalled items (Exp. 2 & 3). Results are as follows: Overt articulatory suppression (Exp. 1), slow speeded rehearsal (Exp. 1) and non-condensation of suppression words (Exp. 2), and monitoring suppression words (Exp. 3) had more negative effects on working memory performances than its counterpart condition, respectively. In the subvocal articulatory suppression condition of Exp. 1, working memory performances varied with the rehearsal speed. And in the non-condensed condition of Exp. 2, the performances varied with kinds of suppression words. It was concluded that articulatory suppression behaviors have effects on the performances of working memory system, and these effects resulted from speech automatization of articulatory suppression behaviors. The results and conclusion of this study are not consistent with Baddeley's model which has not observed the effects of articulatory suppression behaviors. From this it follows that Baddeley's model should be reconfigured to include the effects of articulatory suppression behaviors.

keywords
작업기억, 조음억제행동, 중앙집행장치, 음운루프, 일화적 완충기, working memory, articulatory suppression behaviors, executive control system, phonological loop, episodic buffer

참고문헌

1.

서상규 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도-빈도 7이상-. 연세대학교 언어정보개발원.

2.

정용석, 김정오 (2010). 즉시순차기억에서의 조음억제: 외현적 조음억제는 내현적 시연을 차단하는가? 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(3), 311-335.

3.

Alloway, T. P., Kerr, I., & Langheinrich, T. (2010). The effect of articulatory suppression and manual tapping on serial recall. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 297-305.

4.

Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.

5.

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.

6.

Baddeley, A. (2003a). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208.

7.

Baddeley, A. (2003b). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.

8.

Baddeley, A., Chincotta, D. M., & Adlam, A. (2001). A action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 641-657.

9.

Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2010). Memory. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.

10.

Baddeley, A., Eldridge, M., & Lewis, V. (1981). The role of subvocalization in reading. The Quartly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 439-454.

11.

Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed), Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation(pp.28-61). NY: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C.(1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review. 105, 159-173.

13.

Baddeley, A., & Larsen, J. D. (2007a). The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for “a perceptual-gestural” alternative. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 479-504.

14.

Baddeley, A., & Larsen, J. D. (2007b). Rejoinder. The phonological loop: Some answers and some questions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 512-518.

15.

Baddeley, A., & Lewis, V. (1981). Interactive prodesses in reading: The inner voice, the inner ear, and the inner eye. In A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Proceedings of Pittsburgh Conference on Interactive Processes in Reading. Hilsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.

16.

Baddeley, A., & Tomson A., & Buchman, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575-589.

17.

Besner, D., Davies, J., & Danels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.

18.

Bregman, A. S., & Rudnicky, A. I. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 1, 263-267.

19.

Camos, V., Lagner, P., & Barrouilet, P. (2009). Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 457-469.

20.

Campoy, G., & Baddeley, A. (2008). Phonological and semantic strategies in immediate serial recall. Memory, 16(4). 329-340.

21.

Chen, Z., & Cowan, N. (2009). Core verbal working memory capacity: The limit in words retained without covert articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(7), 1420-1429.

22.

Chincotta, D., & Underwood, G. (1997). Digit span and articulatory suppression: A cross-linguistic comparison. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 89-96.

23.

Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E., & Trollope, J. (1990). Articulatory suppression and phonological codes in reading for meaning. The Quartly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A(2), 375-399.

24.

Gal'perin, P. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole and I. Maltzman(Eds.), A Handbook of Contemporary Soviet Psychology. New York: Basic Books.

25.

Goldstein, E. B. (2011). 감각과 지각. (김정오 외 역) 서울: 센게이지러닝코리아. [원저는 2007년 출판]

26.

Howard, D. & Franklin, S. (1989). Memory without rehearsal. In T. Shallice & G. Vallar (Eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 627-652.

28.

Jones, D. M., Hughes, R. W., & Macken, W. J. (2006). Perceptual organization masquerading as phonological storage: Further support for a perceptual-gestural view of short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 265-281.

29.

Jones, D. M., Hughes, R. W., & Macken, W. J. (2007). Commentary on Baddeley and Larsen (2007). The phonological store abandoned. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 505-511.

30.

Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Nicholls, A. P. (2004). The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Psychology, 30(3), 656-674.

31.

Kimble, G., & Permutter, L. (1970). The Problem of Volition. New York: Academic Press.

32.

Larsen, J. D., & Baddeley, A. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do you have a common source? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A(8). 1249-1268.

33.

Levy, B. A. (1971). Role of articulation in auditory and visual short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 123-132.

34.

Luria, A. R. (1961). The Role of Speech in the Regulation of Normal and Abnormal Behavior. New York: Liveright.

35.

Meichenbaum D. (1977). Cognitive Behavior Modification. New York: Plenum Press.

36.

Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford Press.

37.

Murray, D. L. (1968). Articulatory and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78(4), 679-684.

38.

Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331-347.

39.

Saeki, E., Saito, S., & Kawaguchi, J. (2006). Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching. Memory, 14(8), 965-976.

40.

Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.

41.

Savage, R., Lavers, N., & Pillay, V. (2007). Working memory and reading difficulties: What we know and we don't know about the relationship. Educational Psychology Review, 19. 185-221.

42.

Tomkins, S. (1970). A theory of memory. In J. Antrobus(Eds.), Cognition and Affect. Boston: Little Brown.

43.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

44.

Wilding, J., & White, W. (1985). Impairment of rhyme judgements by silent and overt articulatory suppression. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 95-107.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책