바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.4
Citation Share

The Effect of an Interval between Target Pre-cue and Search Array Onset on the Formation of a Target Template

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2014, v.26 no.4, pp.255-272
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2014.26.4.003


& (2014). The Effect of an Interval between Target Pre-cue and Search Array Onset on the Formation of a Target Template. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 26(4), 255-272, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2014.26.4.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study investigated whether or not the length of the time that was given for forming a search target template could affect subsequent search performance in both simple feature search and conjunction search tasks. To accomplish this, we manipulated the inter-stimulus interval (ISI), the time interval between an offset of a pre-cue and subsequent onset of a search array, to 50ms, 500ms and 1500ms in Experiment 1, and to 100ms, 300ms, 500ms and 700ms in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the search RTs were rather constant despite the extended ISIs in both the color and orientation simple feature search conditions. However, the RTs became faster as the ISIs were extended in the color-orientation conjunction search condition. In Experiment 2, benefit of the extended ISIs were found in all search conditions when the orientation feature search task was replaced with a Landolt gap search task. Especially, the results showed that search could be faster if the ISIs are extended to maximum 300ms in the simple feature search, whereas if they are extended to maximum 500ms in conjunction search. These results indicate that the type of a target template formed by pre-cues can affect the minimum time to complete a subsequent search task.

keywords
visual search, target template, conjunction search, simple feature search, 시각탐색, 표적 형판, 결합 탐색, 단순 세부특징 탐색

Reference

1.

Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 109.

2.

Cepeda, N. J., Cave, K. R., Bichot, N. P., & Kim, M. S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(5), 727-746.

3.

Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.

4.

Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.

5.

Henderson, J. M., Weeks Jr, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210.

6.

Hoffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3), 283-290.

7.

Hooge, I. T. C., & Erkelens, C. J. (1996). Control of fixation duration in a simple search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 969-976.

8.

Jolicœur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 138-202.

9.

Kim, M. S., & Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6(6), 376-380.

10.

Mannan, S. K., Kennard, C., Potter, D., Pan, Y., & Soto, D. (2010). Early oculomotor capture by new onsets driven by the contents of working memory. Vision Research, 50(16), 1590-1597.

11.

Olivers, C. N., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243.

12.

Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2011). Visual search guidance is best after a short delay. Vision Research, 51(6), 535-545.

13.

Shapiro, K. L., & Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Orlando, CA: Academic Press.

14.

Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 342-348.

15.

Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2011). On the limits of top-down control of visual selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2092-2103.

16.

Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(2), 201-237.

17.

Vickery, T. J., King, L. W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 8.

18.

Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2005). Pushing around the locus of selection: Evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(12), 1907-1922.

19.

Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2013). The time it takes to turn a memory into a template. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 8.

20.

Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. K. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15(3), 419-433.

21.

Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411-1426.

22.

Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Palmer, E. M., Michod, K. O., & Van Wert, M. J. (2010). Getting into guided search. Tutorials in Visual Cognition, 93-119.

23.

Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuo- spatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274.

24.

Woodman, G. F., & Arita, J. T. (2011). Direct electrophysiological measurement of attentional templates in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 22(2), 212-215.

25.

Wu, R., Scerif, G., Aslin, R. N., Smith, T. J., Nako, R., & Eimer, M. (2013). Searching for something familiar or novel: Top-Down attentional selection of specific items or object categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 719-729.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy