바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.3
Citation Share

Categorical Representation of Time Perspective in Implicit Association Test

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2015, v.27 no.3, pp.583-591
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.3.012




& (2015). Categorical Representation of Time Perspective in Implicit Association Test. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 27(3), 583-591, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.3.012
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Zimbardo and Boyd(1999) suggested the time perspective theory for explaining mental representation. This theory assumes that time is the primary dimension of mental representation. This study was conducted to examine the implicit categorical representation of time perspective using implicit association test(the time persepctive-IAT) sensitive to implicit processing. The results suggested that the time perspective of past, present and future could be major components of mental representation. The time perspective-IAT scores showed that the present were evaluated more positive than the past and the fatalism was more strongly associated with the future than the present. But the effect size of the time perspective-IAT scores were small. These results were discussed by using optimal balanced representation perspective.

keywords
시간관, 암묵연합검사, 과거, 현재, 미래, 긍정, 부정, 쾌락, 숙명, time perspective, IAT, past, present, future, positive, negative, hedonism, fatalism

Reference

1.

남기심 (2005). 현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사2. 서울: 국립국어원.

2.

오정아 (역) (2008). 타임 패러독스. 서울: 미디어윌.

3.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

4.

Bolotova, A. K., & Hachaturova, M. R. (2013). The role of time perspective in coping behavior. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6, 120-131.

5.

Boniwell, I. (2009). Perspectives on time. In S. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd Ed.) (pp. 295-302). New York: Oxford University Press.

6.

Cretu, R. Z., & Negovan-Zbăganu, V. (2013). An exploratory approach of the structure of Zimbardo’s time perspective concept. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 753-757.

7.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

8.

Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594-628.

9.

Fortunato, V. J., & Furey, J. T. (2010). The theory of MindTime: The relationships between thinking perspective and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 436- 441.

10.

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self- esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.

11.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

12.

Holman, E. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). The social language of time: The time perspective- social network connection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 136-147.

13.

Kant, I. (1965). Critique of Practical Reason (N. Smith, Trans.). N.Y.: St. Matin’s Press. (Original work published 1890)

14.

Kruger, D. J., Reischl, T. M., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). Time perspective as a mechanism for functional developmental adaptation. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 2, 1-22.

15.

Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the “field at a given time”. Psychological Review, 50, 292-310.

16.

Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65-69.

17.

Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.) (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

18.

Stolarski, M., Fieulaine, N., & van Beek, W. (2015). Time perspective theory: The Introduction. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 1-13). Springer.

19.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1982). Voprosy teorii i istorii psichologii [Problems of psychological theory and history] In Sobranie sochineni [Collected works] (Vol. 1, p. 108). Moscow: Pedagogics.

20.

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.

21.

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox. New York: Free Press/ Simon & Schuster.

22.

Zimbardo, P. G., Sword, R., & Sword, R. (2012). The time cure: Overcoming PTSD with the new psychology of time perspective therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

23.

Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy