바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of Emotion on Visual Crowding

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.3, pp.221-236
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.3.002


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The current study examined the emotional effects on visual crowding in which the identification of a target stimulus is difficult when the target is presented with adjacent stimuli in subjects’ peripheral vision. In stead of previous research stimulus such as the English letter or a face as stimulus on visual crowding, the Korean letters were employed because only one Korean letter could have meaning and emotion. In experiment 1, we conducted the target identification task in which participants were asked to report the target that contained emotional values (positive, negative) or did not (neutral) were presented alone (isolated condition), or presented with adjacent meaningless Korean letter distractors (crowded condition). The results indicated that whereas positive and negative targets were identified more correctly in the isolated condition (negative > positive > neutral), this benefit disappeared in the crowded condition. Nevertheless, when the target with the meaningless Korean letter distractors was presented, the emotional value of the target could be damaged because stimuli have forms such as one three-letter word. Therefore, in experiment 2, we employed English letters instead of meaningless Korean letters as distractors. The results indicated that negative targets were identified more correctly in not only the isolated condition but also the crowded condition. The results implied that the emotional value of the target is processed despite the existence of adjacent distractors.

keywords
밀집효과, 정서, 주변시, 한글자극, visual crowding, emotion, peripheral vision, Korean letter stimulus

Reference

1.

Bernard, J. B., & Chung, S. T. (2011). The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity. Journal of Vision, 11, 1-16.

2.

Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.

3.

Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782.

4.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

5.

Chung, S. T., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (1998). Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research, 38, 2949-2962.

6.

Faivre, N., Berthet, V., & Kouider, S. (2012). Nonconscious influences from emotional faces:a comparison of visual crowding, masking, and continuous flash suppression. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-13.

7.

Fine, E. M. (2001). Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking. Optometry & Vision Science, 78, 831-838.

8.

Isaacowitz, D. M., Wadlinger, H. A., Goren, D., & Wilson, H. R. (2006). Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study. Psychology and Aging, 21, 40-48.

9.

Kouider, S., Berthet, V., & Faivre, N. (2011). Preference is biased by crowded facial expressions. Psychological Science, 22, 184-189.

10.

Lee, E., Kang, J. I., Park, I. H., Kim, J. J., & An, S. K. (2008). Is a neutral face really evaluated as being emotionally neutral?. Psychiatry Research, 157, 77-85.

11.

Lee, H. (2008). The crowding effects in character recognition in Hangul. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 109-122.

12.

Lee, H. W., Legge G. E., & Ortiz A. (2003). Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? Vision Research, 43, 2837-2846.

13.

Mumenthaler, C., & Sander, D. (2012). Social appraisal influences recognition of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1118-1135.

14.

Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. R., Hughes, B., McRae, K., Cooper, J. C., Weber, J., ..., & Gross, J. J. (2009). Bottom-up and top-down processes in emotion generation: common and distinct neural mechanisms. Psychological Science, 20, 1322-1331.

15.

Park, S., & Jung, W. (2006). The effect of spatial frequency filtering on facial expression recognition and age perception. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 311-324.

16.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.

17.

Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., & Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-36.

18.

Peng, C., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhang, M. (2013). Crowded words can be processed semantically: Evidence from an ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 91-95.

19.

Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.

20.

Seo, S. (1998). A frequency dictionary of comtemporary Korean vocabulary. Seoul, South Korea: Yonsei institute of language and information studies.

21.

Seo, S. (2014). A meaning frequency dictionary of basic Korean vocabulary. Seoul, South Korea:Hankookmunhwasa.

22.

Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.

23.

Yeh, S. L., He, S., & Cavanagh, P. (2012). Semantic priming from crowded words. Psychological Science, 23, 608-616.

24.

Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. (2010). Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. Journal of Vision, 10, 16.

25.

Zhang, J. Y., Zhang, T., Xue, F., Liu, L., & Yu, C. (2009). Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influences on crowding. Vision Research, 49, 44-53.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology