Individual Differences in Error Types and Personality Traits

인간 오류는 다양한 사고의 원인이 될 수 있기 때문에 이러한 사고를 예방하기 위하여 오류발생의 원인을 규명하는 것이 필요하다. 본 연구는 개인의 성격특성과 오류 발생의 관련성을 확인하기 위해 내외통제척도, BIS/BAS척도와 멈춤신호과제에서 발생하는 오류들에 대해 상관분석과 중다회귀분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 내적통제소재는 반응 시간과 부적 상관을 보였고, Stop시행에서의 수행오류, Go시행에서의 수행오류와 정적 상관을 보였으며, 행동억제체계는 Stop시행에서의 수행오류와 부적 상관을 보였다. 이는 내적통제소재 경향이 높을수록 빠른 반응 경향 때문에 과제 전반에서 수행오류를 많이 보이고, 행동억제체계 경향이 낮을수록 반응 억제에 실패하여 Stop 수행오류를 많이 나타내는 것으로 보인다. 본 연구는 오류 유형과 성격특성 간의 관계를 통해 오류의 예방에 대한 가능성을 제시한다.

keywords: Human errors, Personality traits, Stop-signal task, 인간 오류, 성격특성, 멈춤신호과제

Abstract

Since human errors can cause various accidents, it is necessary to identify the causes of human errors to prevent such accidents. In this study, we investigated the relation between errors and personalities by conducting correlation and multiple regression analyses between locus of control, BIS/BAS scales and errors observed in the stop-signal task. The result showed that internal locus of control was negatively correlated with reaction times and positively correlated with commission errors on go and stop trials. The behavioral inhibition system was negatively correlated with commission errors on the stop trials. Results demonstrated that the higher scores of internal locus of control was associated with more commission errors on go and stop trials due to fast responses, and the lower scores of the behavioral inhibition system was associated with more frequent stop commission errors due to failure of inhibition. The present study suggests the possibility of prevention of errors through the relation between error types and personality traits.

keywords: Human errors, Personality traits, Stop-signal task, 인간 오류, 성격특성, 멈춤신호과제

참고문헌

Avila, C., & Parcet, M. A. (2001). Personality and inhibitory deficits in the stop-signal task: The mediating role of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 975-986.

Boksem, M. A., Tops, M., Wester, A. E., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M. (2006). Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity. Brain Research, 1101, 92-101.

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment:the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319.

Cha, J., Gong, J, & Kim, C. (1973). Locus of control scale. Korea Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Research Note, 2, 263-271.

Choi, J., & Kim, C. (2015). Performance error prediction based on reaction times. Journal of Social Science, 26, 3-21.

Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation–motivation)approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2339-2354.

Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & De Brabander, B. (2006). On feeling in control: a biological theory for individual differences in control perception. Brain and Cognition, 62, 143-176.

Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance:Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148-164.

Fauth-Bühler, M., de Rover, M., Rubia, K., Garavan, H., Abbott, S., Clark, L., Vollstadt-Klein, S, Mann, K., Schumann, G., Robbins, T. W. (2012). Brain networks subserving fixed versus performance-adjusted delay stop trials in a stop signal task. Behavioural Brain Research, 235, 89-97.

10.

Fitts, P. M., & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103.

11.

Fowles, D. C. (1987). Application of a behavioral theory of motivation to the concepts of anxiety and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 417-435.

12.

Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (Vol. 5.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Green, T. M., & Fisher, B. (2010). Towards the personal equation of interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction. Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2010 IEEE Symposium on.

14.

Keramati, M., Dezfouli, A., & Piray, P. (2011). Speed/accuracy trade-off between the habitual and the goal-directed processes. PLoS Computational Biology, 7, e1002055.

15.

Kim, B., & Bishu, R. R. (2006). Uncertainty of human error and fuzzy approach to human reliability analysis. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14, 111-129.

16.

Kim, K., & Kim, W. (2001). Korean-BAS/BIS scale. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 19-37.

17.

Levin, E. D., Conners, C. K., Silva, D., Hinton, S. C., Meck, W. H., March, J., & Rose, J. E. (1998). Transdermal nicotine effects on attention. Psychopharmacology, 140, 135-141.

18.

Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295.

19.

Luu, P., Collins, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 43.

20.

Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press.

21.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1.

22.

Rotter, J. B. (1992). Some comments on the “Cognates of personal control”. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1, 127-129.

23.

Sütterlin, S., Andersson, S., & Claus, V. (2011). Inhibition in Action–Inhibitory Components in the Behavioral Activation System. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 1, 160.

24.

Santesso, D. L., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2009). The error‐related negativity is related to risk taking and empathy in young men. Psychophysiology, 46, 143-152.

25.

Schell, K. L., Hunsaker, C., & Kelley, K. (2006). Extending effects of salience and payoffs on stimulus discrimination: an experimental simulation of prescription checking. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 375-386.

26.

Soshi, T., Ando, K., Noda, T., Nakazawa, K., Tsumura, H., & Okada, T. (2015). Post-error action control is neurobehaviorally modulated under conditions of constant speeded response. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1072.

27.

Wacker, J., Chavanon, M. L., Leue, A., & Stemmler, G. (2010). Trait BIS predicts alpha asymmetry and P300 in a Go/No‐Go task. European Journal of Personality, 24, 85-105.

28.

Weinger, M. B., & Smith, N. T. (1993). Vigilance, alarms, and integrated monitoring systems. In Malvern, PA (Ed.) Anesthesia equipment: principles and applications (pp. 350-384). Mosby Year Book.

29.

Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2001). Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: Application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 72, 1006-1016.

30.

Yi, K., & Kim, C. (2016). Prediction and classification of performance errors by machine learning: Focusing on inter-trial intervals. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28, 543-562. 1

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.29 No.3

오류 유형과 성격특성의 개인차

Individual Differences in Error Types and Personality Traits

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물