바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.4
Citation Share

The Influence of Visibility of the First Target on the Attentional Blink against the Second Target under the Multiple RSVP

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.4, pp.447-454
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.007


& (2017). The Influence of Visibility of the First Target on the Attentional Blink against the Second Target under the Multiple RSVP. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 29(4), 447-454, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.007
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Attentional blink refers to impaired identification of the second target (T2) displayed within 500ms after the first target (T1) when both the targets are embedded in a single stream of letters under rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). According to the bottleneck account that the amount of allocated resources prioritized for T1 memory consolidation prevents a conscious report of T2’s identity, the present study examined the influence of T1 visibility on the strength of AB against T2 when both the targets were embedded in multiple RSVP streams where each stream was proceeded at one among four fixed locations. In Experiment 1 and 2, T1 in the high-visibility condition was colored in a pitch-black to create a high contrast target against the gray background whereas T1 in the low-visibility condition was colored in a dim gray for a low contrast one. Specifically in Experiment 2, three randomly-selected distractors in each RSVP frame were replaced with a ‘#’ sign to minimize any distractor interference. The results of both experiments showed that AB in T1 high-visibility condition was less strong than T1 low-visibility condition. These suggest that enhanced T1 visibility reduced the amount of allocated resources for T1 memory consolidation, subsequently leading to allocation of extra processing resources to T2 identification.

keywords
Attentional Blink, Visibility, Contrast, Bottleneck Account, 주의깜박거림, 가시성, 명암대비, 병목모형

Reference

1.

Ariga, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2008). Attentional awakening: Gradual modulation of temporal attention in rapid serial visual presentation. Psychological Research, 72, 192-202.

2.

Chua, F. K. (2005). The effect of target contrast on the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 770-788.

3.

Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.

4.

Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control. Psychological Review, 69, 191-200.

5.

Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 1683-1700.

6.

Ghorashi, S. M., Zuvic, S. M., Visser, T. A., & Di Lollo, V. (2003). Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 78.

7.

Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J. I., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Attention, Perception, &Psychophysics, 69, 1162-1174.

8.

Kim, G., & Hyun, J. -S. (2016). The influence of location uncertainty and visibility of targets on the strength of attentional blink. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 27, 275-301.

9.

Lu, Z. L., & Dosher, B. A. (2000). Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1534.

10.

Maki, W. S., & Padmanabhan, G. (1994). Transient suppression of processing during rapid serial visual presentation: Acquired distinctiveness of probes modulates the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 499-504.

11.

McLaughlin, E. N., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 54, 169-196.

12.

Park, J. -M., Kim, G., & Hyun, J. -S. (2017). The influence of stimulus contrast and color on target detection under multiple rapid serial visual presentation. Science of Emotion &Sensibility, 20, 137-148.

13.

Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.

14.

Reeves, A., Fuller, H., & Fine, E. M. (2005). The role of attention in binding shape to color. Vision Research, 45, 3343-3355.

15.

Seiffert, A. E., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-Level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &Performance, 23, 1061-1073.

16.

Shih, S., & Reeves, A. (2007). Attentional capture in rapid serial visual presentation. Spatial Vision, 20, 301-315.

17.

Shiu, L. P., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037.

18.

Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 739-743.

19.

Zhao, J., Li, H., Ding, C., & Chen, A. (2012). Distractor detection and suppression have a beneficial effect on attentional blink. PLoS One, 7, e44786.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy