바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.4

Citation Share

성격 특성 지각이 신체적 매력 지각에 미치는 영향: 정직성과 외향성을 중심으로

The Influence of personality trait on the Physical Attractiveness, Honesty and Extraversion

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.4, pp.423-445
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.006
임혜진 (국민건강보험)
최승원 (덕성여자대학교)
임혜진, & 최승원. (2017). 성격 특성 지각이 신체적 매력 지각에 미치는 영향: 정직성과 외향성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 29(4), 423-445, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.006

초록

본 연구는 정직성 및 외향성의 성격 특성이 신체적 매력 지각에 미치는 영향을 확인하고자 하였다. 신체적 매력도에 따라 자극을 3수준으로 구분하였고, 성격의 6요인 모델에서 외향성과 정직성을 반영하는 형용사를 사용, 정직성 3수준(고, 중, 저), 외향성 3수준(고, 중, 저)을 조합하여 총 9가지 성격 기술지를 완성하였다. 피험자들은 독립된 방에서 컴퓨터 화면에 제시되는 사진 자극 혹은 성격 기술이 제공된 사진 자극을 보고 7점 척도로 자극을 평정하였다. 세 수준의 신체적 매력도로 구분된 사진 자극은 단독으로 제시되거나, 정직성과 외향성이 각각 3수준으로 구성된 총9개의 성격 기술지와 함께 제시되었다. 참가자들은 2회에 걸쳐 54번씩 총 108번 자극을 평가하였으며 각 시행의 순서는 무선화하였다. 사진 단독 제시 시행에서 매력 점수의 변화를 알아보기 위하여 반복측정 분산분석을 실시하고, 성격 정보가 반영된 매력도에 따른 효과를 확인하기 위하여 3X3X3 요인 설계에 따른 반복측정 분산분석을 실시하였다. 전반적으로, 사진 자극을 단독으로 제시한 조건과 성격 기술지가 함께 제시된 조건에서 매력 평정 점수의 유의한 차이가 있었다. 외향성은 그 수준에 따라 자극의 매력도와 상호작용 효과를 보이며 상이한 결과를 보였다. 반면 정직성은 모든 수준의 신체적 매력에 영향을 주는 동시에 외향성과 상호작용 효과를 보이며 매력 평정 점수의 변화를 보였다. 이에 따라 성격 정보에 대한 지각이 신체적 매력 지각에 영향을 미쳐 전반적인 매력도를 변화시킬 수 있음을 확인하였다.

keywords
신체적 매력, 성격심리학, 정직성, 외향성, perception, personality, attractiveness, honesty

Abstract

This study examined the influence of personality information on perceptions of physical attractiveness. Personality information was constructed using adjective which proved honesty and extraversion in lexical studies of personality structure. 3 level of honesty(high, medium, low) and 3 level of extraversion(high, medium, low) combined in 9 type personality information. In the present study, 20 women and 7 men rated physical attractiveness of the other sex target photograph. participation rated every photograph twice, total 108 condition of target which randomized. target was given 54 photograph at a trial, 27 photograph had given with personality information, 27 photograph without. The photograph had given with personality information at first trial was given without at second trial. Statistical analysis, using repeated ANOVA, revealed that 3 level of physical attractiveness, 3 level of extraversion and 3 level of honesty have significant effect on attractiveness in condition with personality information. low level attractiveness photograph with personality information had rated more attractiveness than low level attractiveness photograph without. The more honest, the more attractive in every condition.

keywords
신체적 매력, 성격심리학, 정직성, 외향성, perception, personality, attractiveness, honesty

참고문헌

1.

Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116.

2.

Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Strong, G. (2006). Romantic love. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 595-614). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

3.

Atoum, A. O., & Al-Simadi, F. A. (2000). The effect of presentation modality on judgments of honesty and attractiveness. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 28, 269-278.

4.

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., ..., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86, 356.

5.

Barelds, D. P., Dijkstra, P., Koudenburg, N., & Swami, V. (2011). An assessment of positive illusions of the physical attractiveness of romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 706-719.

6.

Berry, D. S., & Miller, K. M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62-77.

7.

Blackwell Publishing Ltd. (2007, November 30). Personality Traits Influence Perceived Attractiveness. ScienceDaily. Retrieved January 20, 2015 www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071129145852.htm

8.

Bourdage, J. S., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Perry, A. (2007). Big Five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1506-1516.

9.

Carter, G. L., Campbell, A. C., & Muncer, S. (2014a). The Dark Triad personality:Attractiveness to women. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 57-61.

10.

Carter, G. L., Campbell, A. C., & Muncer, S. (2014b). The Dark Triad: Beyond a ‘male’mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 159-164.

11.

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285.

12.

Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304.

13.

Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A., & Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431-441.

14.

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26.

15.

Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces:studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837.

16.

Job Korea. (2011). The first thing you look at when reviewing a new employee resume review. Retrieved from http://www.jobkorea.co.kr/starter/live/Live_view.asp?View_I_No=3817

17.

Kim, H. S. (1993). The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Interpersonal Perception and impression Judgment in Koreans. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 7, 46-62.

18.

Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2004). The effect of nonphysical traits on the perception of physical attractiveness: Three naturalistic studies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 88-101.

19.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571-1582.

20.

Lee, K. B., Yoo, T. Y., & Ashton, M. C. (2003). A New Six-Dimensional Model of Personality Structure: Implications for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16, 89-105.

21.

Yoo, T. Y., Lee, K. B., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 18, 61-75.

22.

Lee, K. B., & Ashton, M. C. (2012). H factor of personality. Seoul: Moonye Publishing Co., Ltd.

23.

Lewandowski, G. W., Aron, A., & Gee, J. (2007). Personality goes a long way: The malleability of opposite‐sex physical attractiveness. Personal Relationships, 14, 571-585.

24.

Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon. revised and augmented throughout by Sir Henry Stuart Jones with the assistance of Roderick McKenzie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

25.

Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1107-1118.

26.

Locher, P., Unger, R., Sociedade, P., & Wahl, J. (1993). At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype. Sex Roles, 28, 729-743.

27.

McArthur, L. Z., & Apatow, K. (1984). Impressions of baby-faced adults. Social Cognition, 2, 315-342.

28.

Nettle, D. (2005). An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 363-373.

29.

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574.

30.

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.

31.

Paunonen, S. V. (2006). You are honest, therefore I like you and find you attractive. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 237-249.

32.

Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2013). The perceived attractiveness and traits of the Dark Triad: Narcissists are perceived as hot, Machiavellians and psychopaths not. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 582-586.

33.

Rodin, M. J. (1987). Who is memorable to whom:A study of cognitive disregard. Social Cognition, 5, 144-165.

34.

Ryckman, R. M., Robbins, M. A., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1989). Male and female raters'stereotyping of male and female physiques. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 244-251.

35.

Saram In. (2014). Does employee’s photograph of resume affect decision acceptance of employment. Retrieved from http://www.stat.co.kr/site/datanews/STWork.asp?itemIDT=2002941&aID=S20140918142151163

36.

Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21-50). New York: Guilford Press.

37.

Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior:On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656.

38.

Stroebe, W., Insko, C. A., Thompson, V. D., & Layton, B. D. (1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.

39.

Swami, V., Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Akbar, K., Gordon, N., Harris, T., & Tovée, M. J. (2010). More than just skin deep? Personality information influences men's ratings of the attractiveness of women's body sizes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 628-647.

40.

Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.

41.

Yoon, Y. D. (2008). The Spectrum of Aesthetic Morality and Moral Education. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 19, 19-46.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책