바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3

Citation Share

Temporal locus of phonological information processing during Korean visual word recognition: ERP evidence of the irregular words

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.3, pp.277-283
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.3.006



& (2018). Temporal locus of phonological information processing during Korean visual word recognition: ERP evidence of the irregular words. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 30(3), 277-283, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.3.006

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether phonological information of the visually presented word is activated before lexical access. To do so, the present study compared ERPs of the irregular words and regular words. Since N320 component has been known as an ERP component reflecting grapheme to phoneme conversion, we would expect different N320 waves between irregular and regular words if phonological information is activated before lexical access. As expected, the results showed larger N320 for irregular words than regular words. The present study supported the idea that phonological information is activated from the sublexical level during visual word recognition processing.

keywords
Korean word recognition, ERP, phonological information, regularity, N320 component, 한글 단어재인, 사건관련 뇌전위, 음운부호, 규칙성, N320 성분

Reference

1.

Araújo, S., Faísca, L., Bramão, I., Reis, A., & Petersson, K. M. (2015). Lexical and sublexical orthographic processing: An ERP study with skilled and dyslexic adult readers. Brain and Language, 141, 16-27.

2.

Bae, S., & Yi, K. (2010). Processing of orthography and phonology in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22, 369-385.

3.

Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution, 11, 235-260.

4.

Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 90-98.

5.

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.

6.

Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (2003). Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 56, 403-419.

7.

Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 116-129.

8.

Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128-156.

9.

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.

10.

Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647.

11.

Kwon, Y., Choi, S., & Lee, Y. (2015). Early use of orthographic information in spoken word recognition: Event-related potential evidence from the Korean language. Psychophysiology, 53, 544-552.

12.

Kwon, Y., & Lee, Y. (2016). Temporal Locus of the Influence of Phonological Information during Korean Visual Word Recognition: Event-Related Potential Evidences of Homophone. The Journal of Linguistic Science, 76, 1-21.

13.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience Letters, 501, 117-121.

14.

Kwon, Y., Nam, Y., & Lee, Y. (2015). The Effect of the Phonological Information in Korean Visual Word Recognition: An Event Related Potential Study. The Journal of Linguistic Science, 75, 23-42.

15.

Lee. Y., Kwon. Y., & Lee, C. (2015). The Event Related Potential Evidence for the Orthographic and Phonological Priming in Korean Visual Word Recognition. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(4b), 2093-2105.

16.

Park, K. (1999). Is phonology obligatory in visual access to word meaning? Negative evidence from associative homophone priming in Korean word naming task. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17-28.

17.

Park, K. (2003). The Role of Phonology in Assessing Word Meaning: Evidence from Semantic Categorization of Hangul Words. The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 19-37.

18.

Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.

19.

Simon, G., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2006). Orthographic transparency and grapheme–phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers. Brain Research, 1104, 141-152.

20.

Tae, J., Nam, Y., Lee, Y., & Kim, T. H. (2015). The Role of Syllable and Antibody in Korean Visual Word Recognition. The Journal of Linguistic Science, 73, 205-224.

21.

Yi, K. (1996). Phonological rules in oral reading of Korean. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 8, 1-23.

22.

Ziegler, J. C., Muneaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 779-793.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy