바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.30 No.4

Citation Share

한국어 체언어절과 용언어절 재인에 관련된 어휘 변인

Lexical Factors that Influence the Korean Eojeol Recognition

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.4, pp.373-390
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.4.004
김제홍 (고려대학교)
남기춘 (고려대학교)
김제홍, & 남기춘. (2018). 한국어 체언어절과 용언어절 재인에 관련된 어휘 변인. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 30(4), 373-390, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.4.004

초록

형태소적으로 복잡한 구성을 가진 어절은 한국어 문장을 구성하는 단위로서, 일반 단어와는 구별되는 뚜렷한 차이점이 있음에도 불구하고, 그 처리과정에 대한 관심은 상대적으로 부족하였다. 본 연구는 한국어 문장에서 각각 주어와 서술어를 담당하는 체언어절과 용언어절의 재인에 미치는 어휘 변인의 차이를 조사하였다. 실험 1에서는 한국어 체언어절, 실험 2에서는 용언어절 재인에 영향을 미치는 예측 변인을 어절판단과제(Eojeol Decision Task, 이하 EDT)로 측정한 반응시간과의 회귀분석으로 도출하였다. 실험 1의 결과, “어절빈도”, ‘원형빈도’, 그리고 “첫음절빈도” 예측 변인이 체언어절의 재인 시간을 유의미하게 예측하는 것으로 나타났고, 실험 2의 결과 “어절빈도”와 “주관적 의미 수” 예측 변인이 유의미한 설명력을 가지는 것으로 조사되었으며, 예측 변인 간의 상호작용은 실험 2의 용언 어절의 예측 변인 간에만 유의미하게 조사되었다. 이에 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 공통으로 나타난 어절빈도가 가지는 의미와 각 어절에 따라서 설명력이 유의미한 어휘 변인이 다르게 나타난 결과를 논의하였다.

keywords
어절, 명사어절, 용언어절, 어절판단과제, 어휘변인, Korean, Eojeol, Recognition, Lexical Factors

Abstract

Despite morphologically complex Korean word Eojeol has its own unique linguistic properties, the research interest related to this topic has been relatively little. Therefore, this study investigates the difference of the recognition process in the Korean Eojeol by significant lexical factors. Two main classes of this study which are used for experiment 1 and 2 are a noun Eojeol and the predicate (verb and adjective) Eojeol. The Eojeol decision task was performed for both experiments, and their reaction time was analyzed by multiple regression analysis. For the experiment 1 (noun Eojeol), the lexical factors of ‘whole Eojeol frequency’, ‘root frequency’, and ‘first syllable sharing frequency’ are predicted as the most effective predictors for the Eojeol recognition time. For experiment 2(the predicate Eojeol), by contrast, the ‘whole Eojeol frequency’ and ‘number of subjective meaning’ factors were predicted for the reaction time of the Eojeol recognition. With these results, we discussed the importance of its common and different significant lexical variables.

keywords
어절, 명사어절, 용언어절, 어절판단과제, 어휘변인, Korean, Eojeol, Recognition, Lexical Factors

참고문헌

1.

Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89-106.

2.

Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2, 285-375.

3.

Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., ..., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459.

4.

Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 63-85.

5.

Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (ed.) Language Production Volume 2: Development, Writing and Other Language Process. London: Academic Press.

6.

Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369-390.

7.

Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 4, 53-61.

8.

Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.

9.

Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding?. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 247-273.

10.

Hwang, H. S. (2015). On the morphological property of josa and eomi. Urimal, 41, 31-59.

11.

Hwang, H. S., & Shi, C. K. (2001). A study on the construction pattern of Korean syntactic word for morphological analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Human and Cognitive Language Technology (pp. 25-32).

12.

Hwang, Y. M. (2007). The representation of Korean verb and adjective Eojeols in the mental lexicon (Doctor dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

13.

Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278-305.

14.

Jastrzembski, J. E., & Stanners, R. F. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 534-537.

15.

Jung, J. B. (2002). The processing and representations of ambiguous morpheme in Korean words (Master dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

16.

Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 601-609.

17.

Kim, H. J., & Cho, J. R. (2001). Phonological awareness, visual perception and reading of hangul in preschool children. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psuchology, 14, 15-28.

18.

Kim, J. H. (2011). The difference in phonological, orthographic and semantic neighborhood size effect according to naming and semantic categorization tasks in Korean visual word recognition (Master dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

19.

Kim, J., Lee, C. H., & Nam, K. (2018). Syllable transposition effect on processing the morphologically complex Korean noun Eojeol. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 30, 261-268.

20.

Kim, M. S., Ha, D. H., & Ko, Y. K. (1977). An outline of Korean grammar history. Top press.

21.

Kim, T. H. (1998). Process of Korean morphological analysis in the inflected verb phrase: Priming effects by the inflected verb and the stem of the verb (Master dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

22.

Kwon, Y. A. (2009). The distinct role of phonological and orthographic syllable units in visual word recognition in Korean, Hangul (Doctor dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

23.

Kwon, Y. (2012). The dissociation of syllabic token and type frequency effect in lexical decision task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 24, 315-328.

24.

Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., & Nam, K. (2011). The different P200 effects of phonological and orthographic syllable frequency in visual word recognition in Korean. Neuroscience Letters, 501, 117-121.

25.

Lee, H. W., Legge, G. E., & Ortiz, A. (2003). Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision?. Vision Research, 43, 2837-2846.

26.

Lee, H. Y. (2010). The representation of Korean ambiguous nouns in the mental lexicon (Master dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea

27.

Lim, H. S., Lee, J. W., Oh, H. G., & Nam, K. C. (2002). A neurocognitive model for Korean Eo-jeol processsing. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Korean Brain Society (pp. 93-94).

28.

Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.

29.

Mathey, S., Zagar, D., Doignon, N., & Seigneuric, A. (2006). The nature of the syllabic neighbourhood effect in French. Acta Psychologica, 123, 372-393.

30.

Millis, M. L., & Bution, S. B. (1989). The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t. Memory & Cognition, 17, 141-147.

31.

Min, S. K., & Yi, K. O. (2005a). Frequency effect in processing Korean noun Eojeols. In Proceedings of Winter Conference on Korean Society for Experimental Psychology (pp. 79-83).

32.

Min, S. K., & Yi, K. O. (2005b). Lexical access in processing Korean noun Eojeols. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Human and Cognitive Language Technology (pp. 57-62).

33.

Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.

34.

Na, Y. H. (2013). Behavioral and ERP correlates of Korean homographs in visual word recognition (Master dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

35.

Nam, K. C., Han, J, H., Baik, Y. J., & Koo, M. M. (2012). Effects of syllable frequency in visually recognizing Korean monosyllabic words. The Journal of Linguistics Science, 63, 1-20.

36.

Nam, K. C., Seo, K. J., Choi, K. S., Lee, K. I., Kim, T. H., & Lee, M. Y. (1997). The word length effect on hangul word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 9, 1-18.

37.

Nam, K. S., & Ko, Y. K. (1985). The standard Korean grammar. Top press.

38.

Park, T. J. (2003). Subjective frequency estimates of Korean words and frequency effect on word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 15, 349-366.

39.

Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245-266.

40.

Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.

41.

Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.

42.

Shi, C. K. (2002). The problems and prospect of modern morphology. Korean Linguistics, 16, 89-104.

43.

Song, S. E. (2006). Some issues in Korean morphology. Korean Language, 39, 117-141.

44.

Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399-412.

45.

Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition, 14, 17-26.

46.

Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.

47.

Wang, W., Li, X., Ning, N., & Zhang, J. X. (2012). The nature of the homophone density effect: An ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones. Neuroscience Letters, 516, 67-71.

48.

Yi, K. O. (1996). Phonological rules in oral reading of Korea. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 8, 1-23.

49.

Yim, H. W., Lim, H. S., & Nam, K. C. (2003) The morphological informtaion processing of Korean verb and noun Eojeols. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Korean Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 23-25).

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책