바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.4
Citation Share

Apparent motion induced by illusory kinetic occlusion of an object blinking in place

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.4, pp.391-400
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.4.005
Yejin Lee (Department of Psychology, Ewha Womans University)
Sung-Ho Kim (Department of Psychology, Ewha Womans University)
Lee, Y., & Kim, S. (2018). Apparent motion induced by illusory kinetic occlusion of an object blinking in place. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 30(4), 391-400, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.4.005
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The current study examined whether a single object repeatedly flashing on and off in place can give rise to a percept of apparent motion when it is presented adjacent to a large occluder behind which an amodal representation can be formed. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the possibility of kinetic occlusion by placing a blinking object behind or in front of a large occluder in a stereoscopic 3D display. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that apparent motion rating was higher when a blinking object was presented behind the occluder than when it was in front. In order to figure out whether apparent motion found in Experiment 1 was actually mediated by kinetic occlusion, an indirect index potentially related to apparent motion was measured using a new experimental task: Participants observed a display involving either a gradual or sudden change of an object in size and reported whether this change appeared gradual or sudden. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that the proportion of the gradual change response was higher when a blinking object was presented behind the occluder than when it was in front. This study suggests that even a single object flashing on and off in place can generate apparent motion when its coming into and going out of existence is perceived to come into and go out of sight while continuing to exist behind an occluder.

keywords
apparent motion, correspondence problem, amodal completion, kinetic occlusion
Submission Date
2018-08-29
Revised Date
2018-10-28
Accepted Date
2018-10-29

Reference

1.

Anstis, S. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1985). Kinetic occlusion by apparent movement. Perception, 14, 145-149.

2.

Blake, R., Ahlström, U., & Alais, D. (1999). Perceptual priming to invisible motion. Psychological Science, 10, 145-150.

3.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

4.

Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121-138.

5.

Chen, Y. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). The perception of history: Seeing causal history in static shapes induces illusory motion perception. Psychological Science, 27, 923-930.

6.

Dawson, M. R. (1991). The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. Psychological Review, 98, 569-603.

7.

Ekroll, V., Faul, F., & Golz, J. (2008). Classification of apparent motion percepts based on temporal factors. Journal of Vision, 8, 31-31.

8.

Green, M. (1986). What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?. Vision Research, 26, 599-607.

9.

Kim, S.-H., Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2012). Curved apparent motion induced by amodal completion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 350-364.

10.

Kim, S.-H., Seo, J., & Jung, Y.-E. (2016). Apparent motion induced by an object flashing on and off in place. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28, 381-388.

11.

McIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Geiselman, E. E. (2014). Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review. Displays, 35, 18-26.

12.

Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G. (1964/1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures. In G. Thinès, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Original work published 1964.

13.

Oh, S. (2011). The Contribution of the Methodological Paradigm of Apparent Motion to the Understanding of Motion Perception. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 23, 1-44.

14.

Ono, F., & Kitazawa, S. (2009). The effect of marker size on the perception of an empty interval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 182-189.

15.

Ono, F., & Kitazawa, S. (2010). The effect of perceived motion-in-depth on time perception. Cognition, 115, 140-146.

16.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.

17.

Ramachandran, V. S., Inada, V., & Kiama, G. (1986). Perception of illusory occlusion in apparent motion. Vision Research, 26, 1741-1749.

18.

Ryu, K. J., Kham, K., & Chung, C.-S. (2004). Spatiotemporal properties of “filling-in” process in apparent motion. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 16, 1-21.

19.

Scherzer, T. R., & Ekroll, V. (2009). Intermittent occlusion enhances the smoothness of sampled motion. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-18.

20.

Shepard, R. N., & Zare, S. L. (1983). Path-guided apparent motion. Science, 220, 632-634.

21.

Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Amodal representation of occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence. Perception, 19, 285-299.

22.

Tse, P., Cavanagh, P., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The role of parsing in high-level motion processing. In T. Watanabe, (Ed.), High-level Motion Processing: Computational, Neurobiological, and Psychophysical Perspectives (pp. 249-266). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Wertheimer, M. (1912/1961). Experimental studies on the seeing of motion. In T. Shipley (Ed.), Classics in Psychology (pp. 1032-1088). New York: Philosophical Library(Original work publihed 1912).

24.

Yantis, S. (1995). Perceived continuity of occluded visual objects. Psychological Science, 6, 182-186.

25.

Yantis, S., & Nakama, T. (1998). Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 508-512.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy