바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.30 No.4

Citation Share

성인 ADHD 성향군의 정서적 자극에 대한 억제적 주의의 특성: 회귀억제 과제를 활용하여

Inhibitional Attention of Emotional Stimulus in Adults with ADHD Tendency: Using Inhibition of Return Task

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2018, v.30 no.4, pp.401-412
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.4.006
하보원 (경북대학교 심리학과)
장문선 (경북대학교)
곽호완 (경북대학교)
하보원, 장문선, & 곽호완. (2018). 성인 ADHD 성향군의 정서적 자극에 대한 억제적 주의의 특성: 회귀억제 과제를 활용하여. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 30(4), 401-412, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2018.30.4.006

초록

본 연구는 성인 ADHD가 정서적 얼굴을 인식하는 데 결함이 있다는 연구들에 기초하여 회귀억제 과제를 이용하여 정서적 자극에 대한 억제적 주의의 특성을 살펴보았다. 실험 1에서 ADHD 성향군의 정서적 자극에 대한 억제적 능력의 특성을 확인하기 위해 단서-표적 회귀억제 과제를 실시하였다. 실험 1의 결과, 통제군의 경우 ADHD 성향군에 비해 동일위치 시행과 상이위치 시행에서의 반응시간 차이인 회귀억제가 슬픔 조건에서 유의하게 크게 나타났다. 이는 통제군과 ADHD 성향군의 행동 양상이 통제군의 정서적 민감성에 의해 차이가 나타날 수 있음을 시사한다. 실험 2에서는 연속적인 정서적 자극에 대한 억제적 능력의 특성을 확인하기 위해 연속반응 회귀억제 과제를 실시하였다. 실험 2의 결과, 기쁨 정서에 대해 연속적으로 동일하게 나타나는 조건에서만 ADHD 성향군이 통제군에 비해 낮은 회귀억제량을 보였고 다른 조건들에서는 집단 간 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 이는 연속적으로 동일한 기쁨 정서에 대한 ADHD 성향군의 낮은 주의 통제 능력을 나타낸다. 본 연구는 각 집단 간 하나의 정서 자극과 연속적인 정서 자극에 대한 억제적 주의 특성의 차이를 확인하고 본 연구의 결과는 각 집단 간 하나의 정서 자극과 연속적인 정서 자극에 대한 억제적 주의 특성의 차이를 통해, 집단에 따라 정서적 자극이 주어진 상황에서의 주의 편향 패턴을 확인할 수 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 제한점과 추후 연구에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
ADHD, inhibitory attention, emotion, inhibition of return, ADHD, 억제적 주의, 정서, 회귀억제

Abstract

This study examined the characteristics of inhibitory attention to emotional stimulation using inhibition of return tasks based on studies in which adult ADHD is deficient in recognizing emotional faces. In Experiment 1, the cue–target of inhibition of return task was performed to identify the inhibitory ability of the ADHD tendency group to emotional stimulation. As a result of experiment 1, inhibition of return, which is the difference in response time between the same and different position, was significantly higher in the sad condition than in the ADHD tendency group. This suggests that the behavioral patterns of the control group and the ADHD tendency group may differ depending on the emotional sensitivity of the control group. In Experiment 2, a continuous response of inhibition of return task was performed to identify the characteristics of inhibitory ability to continuous emotional stimulation. As a result of Experiment 2, the ADHD tendency group showed lower inhibition of return than the control group only under the condition that the pleasure emotion was continuously the same. This study confirmed the differences in the characteristics of inhibitory attention to one emotional stimulus and continuous emotional stimulation among the groups. Based on this experiments, the implications and limitations of this paper are have been discussed.

keywords
ADHD, inhibitory attention, emotion, inhibition of return, ADHD, 억제적 주의, 정서, 회귀억제

참고문헌

1.

An, N. Y., Lee, J. Y., Cho, S. M., Chun, Y. K., & Shin, Y. M. (2013). Difficulty in Facial Emotion Recognition in Children with ADHD. Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 83-89.

2.

Biederman, J., Seidman, L. J., Petty, C. R., Fried, R., Doyle, A. E., Cohen, D. R., ..., & Faraone, S. V. (2008). Effects of stimulant medication on neuropsychological functioning in young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69, 1150-1156.

3.

Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and Memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.

4.

Cadesky, E. B., Mota, V. L., & Schachar, B. J. (2000). Beyond words: how do children with ADHD and/or conduct problems process nonverbal information about affect?. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 1160-1167.

5.

Clarke, S. Heussler, H., & Kohn, M. R. (2005). Attention deficit disorder: not just for children. Internal Medicine Journal, 35, 721-725.

6.

Cocchi, L., Bramati, I. E., Zalesky, A., Furukawa, E., Fontenelle, L. F., Moll, J., ..., & Mattos, P. (2012). Altered functional brain connectivity in a non-clinical sample of young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 17753-17761.

7.

Conners, C. K., Erhard, D., & Sparrow, D. (1999). Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Healt Systems.

8.

Corbett, B., & Glidden, H. (2000). Processing affective stimuli in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 6, 144-155.

9.

Dai, Q., & Feng, Z. (2009). Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 33, 921-932.

10.

Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004-1013.

11.

Huey, E. D., & Wexler, B. E. (1994). Abnormalities in rapid, automatic aspects of attention in schizophrenia: Blunted inhibition of return. Schizophrenia Research, 14, 57-63.

12.

Fox, E, Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681-700.

13.

Heiligenstein, E., Conyers, L. M., Berns, A. R., & Miller, M. A. (1998). Preliminary normative data on DSM–IV attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in college students. Journal of American College Health, 46, 185-188.

14.

Jang, K. M., & Kim. M. S. (2015). Neuropsychological functions of college students with Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) traits. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 665-668.

15.

Jang, M. J. (2004). Characteristic and Educational intervention strategy of Adult with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity. Journal of Education Development, 20, 43-57.

16.

Jeong, J. Y., Kwak, H. W., & Chang, M. S. (2008). Inhibition of Return and Response Inhibition Deficits in Adults with ADHD Tendency. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 27, 179-196.

17.

Kang, S. J., Son, W. J., & Cho, S. R. (2009). Analysis on the Current Status and the Utility of Pictogram for the Blind. Journal of Korea Society of Design Forum, 22, 205-214.

18.

Kim, H. Y., Lee, J. Y., Cho. S. S., Lee, I. S., & Kim, J. H., (2005). A Preliminary Study on Reliability and Validity of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Korean version in College Students. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 171-185.

19.

Kitayama, S. (1990). Interaction Between Affect and Cognition in Word Perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 209-217.

20.

Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.

21.

Kwak, H. W., & Chang, M. S., (2007). Web-based Neuropsychological Experiments in Adults with ADHD Tendency: Inhibition of Return, Stroop, and Endogenous-Exogenous Attention Tasks. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 1039-1056.

22.

Lai, Z., & Shapiro, E. (1993). Deficits in social skills and affect processing in learning disabled children. Manuscript submitted for publication.

23.

Lee, S., Byoun, S., Chang, M. S., & Kwak, H. W. (2015). Characteristics of post-error behavior in adult ADHD tendency. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 27, 519-542.

24.

Lee, S. J., Kwon, J. M., & Lee, H. K. (1998). The Automatic Processing of Emotion. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 515-532.

25.

Leppänen, J. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2009). Emotion recognition and social adjust\-ment in school-aged girls and boys. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 429-435.

26.

Groom, M. J., Kochhar, P., Hamilton, A., Liddle, E. B., Simeou, M., & Hollis, C. (2017). Atypical processing of gaze cues and faces explains comorbidity between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 1496-1509.

27.

Mathews, A., Mackintosh, B., & Fulcher, E. P. (1997). Cognitive biases in anxiety and attention to threat. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 340-345.

28.

Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777-787.

29.

Mckelvie, A. D., & Scragg, E. B. (1973). The control of bracken by asulam. Scottish Agriculture, 51, 474-480.

30.

Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 865-876.

31.

Murphy, K., & Barkley, R. A. (1996). Attention deficit Hyperactivity disorder adults: comorbidities and adaptive impairment. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37, 393-401.

32.

Murphy, K. R., Barkley, R. A., & Bush, T. (2002). Young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: subtype differences in comorbidity, educational, and clinical history. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 147-157.

33.

Noun Project-Icons for Everything (https://thenounproject.com/).

34.

O'Donnell, J. P., McCann, K. K., & Pluth, S. (2001). Assessing Adult ADHD Using a Self-Report Symptom Checklist. Psychologtcal Reports, 88, 871-881.

35.

Oh, K. J., & Pae, D. H. (2002). Recognition of Emotional Expression and Psychosocial Adjustment of Children and Adolescents. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 515-532.

36.

Pantic, M., & Rothkrantz, L. J. M. (2000). Automatic analysis of facial expressions: The state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22, 1424-1445.

37.

Park, H. J., Seo, W. S., Sung, H. M., & Bai, D. S. (2012). Emotional Recognition Defects in Boys with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Combined Type. Journal of the Korean Society of Biological Therapies in Psychiatry, 18, 264-273.

38.

Park, S. Y. (2014). Exploratory research on ADHD has difficulty looking at the job scene. Study Job Employ Serv, 9(1), 93-111.

39.

Paula, M. N. (1990). Implicit perception of affective information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 505-527.

40.

Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51-87.

41.

Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, & D. Bowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

42.

Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., & Skov, R. B. (1996). It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd. Perception, 25, 1091-1108.

43.

Rösler, M., Retz, W., Thome, J., Schneider, M., Stieglitz, R. D., & Falkai, P. (2006). Psychopathological rating scales for diagnostic use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256(Suppl. 1), i3-i11.

44.

Sagiv, N., & Bentin, S. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937-951.

45.

Shapiro, E. G., Hughes, S. J., August, G. J., & Bloomquist, M. L. (1993). Processing of Emotional Information in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9(3-4), 207-224.

46.

Singh, S. D., Ellis, C. R., Winton, A. S., Singh, N. N., Leung, J. P., & Oswald, D. P. (1998). Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification, 22, 128-142.

47.

Song, H. J., Kwon, M K., Oh, K. J., Kim, M. S., Ha, E. H., Song, D. H., & Shin, M. S. (2004). Inhibition of Return Deficit of ADHD. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 243-251.

48.

Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.

49.

Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257-279.

50.

Tye, C., Battaglia, M., Bertoletti, E., Ashwood, K. L., Azadi, B., Asherson, P., Bolton, P., & McLoughlin, G. (2014). Altered neurophysiological responses to emotional faces discriminate children with ASD, ADHD and ASD + ADHD. Biological Psychology, 103, 125-134.

51.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책