바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.2
Citation Share

Study on Effects of Dynamic Stimulation on Time Perception

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2020, v.32 no.2, pp.161-168
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.2.003



& (2020). Study on Effects of Dynamic Stimulation on Time Perception. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 32(2), 161-168, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2020.32.2.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Studies on the relationship between dynamic stimuli and time perception have shown conflicting results. There is a consequence that the looming stimuli causes time dilation, while a decrease in the perceived time also exists. The purpose of this study was to confirm the possibility that such difference was caused by the implementation of dynamic stimulation. In Experiment 1, we compared the linear change condition and the logarithmic change condition. In Experiment 2, we compared the duration condition and the interval condition. As a result, in the linear change condition and the duration condition, the perceived time increased in the looming stimuli. In the logarithmic change condition, no difference was observed. In the interval condition, there was a tendency to increase perceived time in the receding stimuli. These results suggest that although various studies have been experimented and discussed assuming the same situation of approaching/receding movement, various tasks may reflect different mechanisms.

keywords
시간지각, 확장, 축소, 접근, 후퇴, 선형변화, 로그변화, 지속시간, 간격시간, time perception, looming, receding, approaching, linear, logarithmic, duration, interval

Reference

1.

Bliss, C. I. (1934). The method of probits. Science, 79, 38-39.

2.

Brainard, D. H. (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.

3.

Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception &Psychophysics, 57, 105-116.

4.

Cai, M. B., & Eagleman, D. M. (2014). Duration estimates within a modality are integrated sub-optimally. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1041.

5.

Chang, A. Y. C., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., & Wu, D. H. (2011). Big time is not always long: Numerical magnitude automatically affects time reproduction. Psychological Science, 22, 1567-1573.

6.

Cui, Q., Zhao, K., Chen, Y. H., Zheng, W., & Fu, X. (2018). Opposing subjective temporal experiences in response to unpredictable and predictable fear-relevant stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 360.

7.

Gorea, A., & Kim, J. (2015). Time dilates more with apparent than with physical speed. Journal of Vision, 15(1), 7.

8.

Grassi, M., & Pavan, A. (2012). The subjective duration of audiovisual looming and receding stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1321-1333.

9.

Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L., Hogendoorn, H., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Time dilation in dynamic visual display. Journal of Vision, 6(12), 8.

10.

Kaneko, S., & Murakami, I. (2009). Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. Journal of Vision, 9(7), 14.

11.

Lake, J. I., LaBar, K. S., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Hear it playing low and slow: How pitch level differentially influences time perception. Acta Psychologica, 149, 169-177.

12.

Lu, A., Hodges, B., Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. X. (2009). Contextual effects on number-time interaction. Cognition, 113, 117-122.

13.

Matthews, W. J. (2011). How do changes in speed affect the perception of duration?. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1617-1627.

14.

Matthews, W. J. (2013). How does sequence structure affect the judgment of time? Exploring a weighted sum of segments model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 259-282.

15.

Matthews, W. J., Stewart, N., & Wearden, J. H. (2011). Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 303-313.

16.

Mo, S. S., & Michalski, V. A. (1972). Judgment of temporal duration of area as a function of stimulus configuration. Psychonomic Science, 27, 97-98.

17.

Oliveri, M., Vicario, C. M., Salerno, S., Koch, G., Turriziani, P., Mangano, R., Chillemi, G, & Caltagirone, C. (2008). Perceiving numbers alters time perception. Neuroscience Letters, 438, 308-311.

18.

Ono, F., & Kawahara, J. I. (2007). The subjective size of visual stimuli affects the perceived duration of their presentation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 69, 952-957.

19.

Ono, F., & Kitazawa, S. (2010). The effect of perceived motion-in-depth on time perception. Cognition, 115, 140-146.

20.

Pelli, D. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10, 437-442.

21.

Thomas, E. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1976). Simultaneous time and size perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 353-360.

22.

Wittmann, M., Van Wassenhove, V., Craig, B., & Paulus, M. P. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 2.

23.

Xuan, B., Zhang, D., He, S., & Chen, X. (2007). Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 2.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy