바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

범주학습에서 범주화 방략에 미치는 인지양식의 효과

The Effects of Cognitive styles on categorization strategies in category learning

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2008, v.20 no.4, pp.339-355
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2008.20.4.008
이태연 (한서대학교)

초록

본 연구는 인지양식검사(CSA)를 사용하여 피험자를 전체처리자와 분석처리자로 구분하고, 두 처리자가 범주를 학습할 때 서로 다른 범주화 방략을 사용하는지 검토하였다. 실험 1에서는 선형범주와 비선형범주를 제시하고 두 처리자가 어느 범주를 더 빨리 학습하는지를 비교하였다. 분석처리자는 선형범주를 비선형범주보다 빠르게 학습하였으나, 전체처리자는 선형조건간의 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. 또한 재인과제에서 전체처리자가 분석처리자에 비해 더 높은 정확재인율을 보였다. 실험 2에서는 전이사례와 예외사례에 대한 피험자의 범주판단을 개별적으로 분석하여 두 처리자가 범주를 학습할 때 사용하는 범주화 방략을 살펴보았다. 실험 2의 결과에 따르면 분석처리자는 특정한 속성에 선택적 주의를 기울이는 분석적 방략을 더 많이 사용하지만, 전체처리자는 사례간의 유사성을 비교하는 비분석적 방략을 더 많이 사용하였다. 이러한 결과를 볼 때 분석처리자는 범주를 정의하는 규칙을 찾아 범주를 학습하는데 비해 전체처리자는 학습했던 사례와의 유사성을 비교하여 범주를 학습하는 경향이 있다.

keywords
인지양식, 범주화 방략, 전체처리자, 분석처리자, cognitive style, categorization strategy, wholistic processor, analytic processor

Abstract

This study investigated whether participants adopted different categorization strategies to learn categories according to their cognitive styles. At first, participants were classified into two types of processor, analytic processors and wholistic processors by Riding(1991)'s cognitive style analysis(CSA). Manipulating linear separability of category structure, learning speed of two processors were compared in Experiment 1. Results showed that analytic processors learned linearly separated categories more quickly than wholistic processors, and wholistic processors reminded learned exemplars more accurately than analytic processors. In Experiment 2, Analyzing categorization patterns of subjects individually, hypothesis was tested that two processors used different categorization strategies to learn categories. Experiment 2's hypothesis was confirmed partially. In conclusion, analytic processors learned categories by focusing attention on relevant features and wholistic processors by comparing similarity between new exemplar and learned exemplars.

keywords
인지양식, 범주화 방략, 전체처리자, 분석처리자, cognitive style, categorization strategy, wholistic processor, analytic processor

참고문헌

1.

고지룡, (2006) 인지양식에 따른 개념도 점검 방법이 개념도 형성 및 설명적 글쓰기에 미치는 효과, 전남대학교

2.

김미라, (2003) 인지양식이 글 이해와 요약에 미치는 효과, 한국인지과학회 춘계학술대회 발표논문집

3.

정광희 ; 이정모, (2005) 지식유형과 인지양식이 글 요약과 이해에 미치는 영향, 인지과학

4.

조경자 ; 한광희, (2002) 멀티미디어 환경에서 인지양식이 학습 수행에 미치는 영향 , 한국심리학회지 실험 및 인지

5.

한광희 ; 조경자 ; 송승진, (2002) 멀티미디어 환경에서 정보제시 유형과 인지부하가 정보처리에 미치는 영향, 인지과학

6.

조증렬, (1994) 자극유형과 범주구조가 범주화와 재인에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지

7.

Allen, S. W., (1991) Specializing the operation of an explicit rule, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

8.

Anderson,J.R., (1983) The architecture of cognition, Harvard University Press

9.

Armstrong, S. J., (2006) Cognitive style and its relevance for the management of careers, Paper presented at the 66th Academy of management conference

10.

Berry, D. C., (1988) Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction, British Journal of Psychology

11.

Broadbent,D.E., (1989) Lasting representation and temporary processes in:Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving, Earlbaum

12.

Brooks,L., (1978) Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances in:Cognition and Categorization, Erlbaum

13.

Davies, J., (2006) Wholist-analytic cognitive style: A matter of reflection, Personality and Individual differences

14.

Felder,R., (1988) Learning and teacing styles in engineering education, Engineering Education

15.

Hudson,L., (1966) Contrary imaginations, Penguin

16.

Kagan,J., (1965) Indivisual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

17.

Kemler-Nelson,D.G., (1984) The effect of intention on what concepts are acquired, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

18.

Kulik, J. A., (1986) The effectiveness of computer-based adult education: A meta-analysis, Jounral of Educational Computing Research

19.

McAndrews, M. P., (1985) Rule-based and exemplar-based classification in artificial grammar learning, Memory & Cognition

20.

Medin, D. L., (1978) Context theory of classification learning, Psychological Review

21.

Medin, D. L., (1981) Linear separability in classification learning, Journal of experimental psychology: human learning and memory

22.

Medin, D. L., (1987) Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction, Cognitive Psychology

23.

Modigliani, V., (1971) Conservation of simple concepts as a function of deletion of irrelevant attributes, Journal of Experimental Psychology

24.

Najjar,L.J., (1996) Multimedia information and learning, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia

25.

Nosofsky, R. M., (1994) Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning, Psychological Review

26.

Priola, V., (2004) Group work and cognitive style: a discussive investigation, Small Group Research

27.

Reber,A.S., (1989) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge, Journal of Experimental Psychology : General

28.

Regehr, G., (1993) Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

29.

Riding,R., (1991) Cognitive Styles Analysis, Learning and Training Technology

30.

Riding, R., (1991) Cognitve styles: an overview and integration, Educational Psychology

31.

Riding, R., (1998) Cognitive styles and learning strategies: understanding style differences in learning and behavior, Foulton

32.

Robey, D., (1981) Measuring manager's minds: the assessment of style in human information processing, Academy of Management Review

33.

Shiffrin, R. M., (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory, Psychological Review

34.

Smith, E. E., (1981) Categories and Concepts, Harvard University Press

35.

Vosniadou, S., (1989) Similarity and analogical reasoning, Cambridge University Press

36.

Ward, T. B., (1992) Learning categories with and without trying: Does it make a difference in:Percepts, concepts, and categories, North-Holland Press

37.

Ward, T. B., (1987) Analytic and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts, Memory and Cognition

38.

Wattenmaker, W. D., (1986) Linear separability and concept learning: context, relational properties, and concept naturalness, Cognitive psychology

39.

Witkin,H.A., (1962) Psychological differentiation: studies of developtment, Wiley

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물