바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.1

Citation Share

Critiques of Research in Hangul Information Processing

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.1, pp.9-19
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.1.002

(2010). Critiques of Research in Hangul Information Processing. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(1), 9-19, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.1.002

Abstract

Several problems in studying Hangul information processing were discussed. First, the ideal of Hangul orthography to perfectly transcribe Korean pronunciation has long been dominating among Korean scholars as well as Korean people, which can bias studies on Hankul information processing. Second, the problems caused by the Hangul-only system which insists on using Hangul only and expelling Chinese characters from Korean texts were discussed. The author pointed out that more efforts to scrutinize the consequences of ambiguous Kulja-morpheme correspondence of Sino-Korean words resulting from the system should have been made. Third, unification of two Hangul orthographies from North and South Korea is an urgent issue, which has to be solved for the year 2013 compilation of Gyeoremal-keunsajeon (Unabridged and Unified Korean Dictionary). The unification issue should be approached from the psychology of reading, and cognitive psychologists can play an important role. Finally, other controversial issues such as transliteration of foreign words were also discussed from the standpoint of reading efficiency.

keywords
word recognition, Sino-Korean words, Korean orthography, Hangul, 단어인지, 한자어, 남북한어문규정, 한글맞춤법

Reference

1.

이광오 (1999a). 한글 단어인지과정에서 형태소 처리과정. 실험 및 인지심리학회 연차대회논문집, 35-42.

2.

이광오 (1999b). 한자 합성어의 표상과 처리. 한국인지과학회 춘계 학술대회논문집: 인지과학의 현재, 과거, 미래, 73-79.

3.

이광오 (2003). 단어인지 수행은 어종에 따라 다를까? 한국심리학회지: 실험, 15, 479 -498.

4.

이광오, 배성봉 (2008a). 본음 복원 두음법칙 단어의 인지. 한국실험심리학회 겨울학술대회 논문집, 103-110.

5.

이광오, 배성봉 (2008b). 사이시옷 단어의 인지에서 친숙성의 효과. 한국실험심리학회 2008년 겨울학술대회 논문집, 61-67.

6.

이광오, 배성봉 (2009a). 한국어 음절의 표기빈도와 형태소빈도가 단어인지에 미치는 효과. 인지과학, 20, 309-333.

7.

이광오, 배성봉 (2009b). 한국어 고유어의 인지에서 형태소 처리. 한국심리학회지: 인지및생물, 21, 147-161.

8.

이광오, 배성봉, 남기춘 (2005). 한자어의 처리에서 표기 중복의 효과. 한국 실험 및 인지심리학회 연차대회 논문집, 165-169.

9.

이광오, 이인선 (1999). 한글단어의 인지과정에서 형태소 정보처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 11, 77-91.

10.

이광오, 정진갑, 배성봉 (2007). 표기 체계와 시각적 단어 인지: 한자어의 인지에서 형태소의 표상과 처리. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 19, 313-327.

11.

Feldman, L. B., & Andjelkovic, D. (1992). Morphological analysis in word recognition. In R. Frost, & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

12.

Hirose, H. (1992). An investigation of the recognition process for jukugo by use of priming paradigms. The Japanese Journal of Psyhcology, 63, 303-309. [Japanese Literature].

13.

Joyce, T. (2004). Modeling the Japanese mental lexicon: Morphological, orthographic and phonological consideration. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research, Vol. 31. Nova Science Publishers.

14.

Rastle, K., Davis, M., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-538.

15.

Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford University Press.

16.

Stolz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. LEA.

17.

Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink, & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies. NewYork: Plenum.

18.

Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525-565.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy