바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1226-9654
  • E-ISSN2733-466X
  • KCI

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.22 No.2

Citation Share

우리글 읽기에서 낱말빈도와 길이가 눈의 움직임에 미치는 효과

The Frequency and Length Effect on eye fixation in Korean reading

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.2, pp.215-232
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.006
윤시온 (서울대학교)
강원석 (대구경북과학기술원)
안진웅 (대구경북과학기술원)
고성룡 (서울대학교)
윤시온, 강원석, 안진웅, & 고성룡. (2010). 우리글 읽기에서 낱말빈도와 길이가 눈의 움직임에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(2), 215-232, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.2.006

초록

이 연구에서는 우리글 읽기에서 낱말빈도와 길이가 눈의 움직임에 미치는 영향에 대해서 알아보았다. 연구 1에서는 소설을 읽을 때 측정한 어절단위의 안구운동 자료에 대해 회귀분석을 했다. 낱말빈도는 어절/낱말에 처음 눈이 고정하여 머문 시간인 첫고정시간, 한 어절/낱말에 눈이 단 한 번 고정했을 때 머문 시간인 단일고정시간, 낱말/어절에 눈이 착지한 이후 그 어절/낱말을 벗어나기 이전까지 머문 고정시간들의 합인 주시시간 모두를 예측했고, 어절길이는 단일고정시간과 주시시간을 예측했다. 하지만 낱말빈도와 어절길이간의 상호작용은 고정시간에 영향을 미치지 못했다. 연구 2에서는 낱말빈도와 길이를 조작한 요인설계 실험을 했다. 첫고정시간과 단일고정시간에서는 표적낱말 빈도가 높을수록, 고정시간이 짧았다. 주시시간에서는 낱말빈도와 길이의 주효과와 상호작용 모두 관찰되었으나 단일고정시간에서는 상호작용이 관찰되지 않았다. 또한 표적 다음 낱말에서 얻은 고정시간이 표적낱말이 짧은 경우에는 길고 긴 경우에는 짧은 흥미로운 결과도 관찰되었다. 연구 1과 2에서 얻은 결과들은 글 읽기에서 보이는 안구운동을 설명하는 대표적인 최근 모형의 맥락에서 논의되었다.

keywords
word frequency, word length, eye movement, fixation time, 낱말빈도, 낱말길이, 안구운동, 고정시간

Abstract

This study investigated the frequency and length effect on eye fixation in Korean reading using eye-tracking. In study 1, the eye movement data collected during reading a novel were analyzed with regression analysis on a word cluster(eojeol). Frequency predicted first fixation time, single fixation time and gaze duration on eojeols and length predicted single fixation time and gaze duration. However, interaction between two variables, frequency and length, did not predict any fixation times. In study 2, the experiment factorially designed with word frequency and length was carried out to compensate for a limitation of study 1, using eojeol items, not words. First fixation time and single fixation time were shorter in high-frequency words than in low-frequency words. On gaze duration, there were significant main effects of word frequency and length, and also the interaction between them. In addition, it was found that there was a reverse length effect on the next word of the target. The results from study 1 and 2 were discussed in the context of models of eye movement control in reading.

keywords
word frequency, word length, eye movement, fixation time, 낱말빈도, 낱말길이, 안구운동, 고정시간

참고문헌

1.

고성룡, 윤낙영 (2007). 우리 문장 읽기에서 안구 운동의 특성: 어절 길이, 낱말 빈도 및 착지점 관련 효과. 인지과학, 18(4), 325-350.

2.

고성룡, 홍효진, 윤소정, 조병환 (2008). 우리글 명사 어절에서 낱말 빈도 효과: 안구운동 추적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 20(1), 21-37.

3.

박태진 (2003). 자료: 한국어 낱말의 주관적 빈도 추정치 및 낱말 재인에 미치는 빈도 효과. 한국실험심리학회지 실험 및 인지, 15(2), 349-366.

4.

연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도. 연세대학교.

5.

윤낙영, 고성룡 (2009). 난이도가 다른 덩이글 읽기에서의 안구운동 양상. 인지과학, 20(3), 291-307.

6.

이광오 (1993). 한글 단어인지과정에서 표기법이 심성어휘집의 구조와 검색에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 5, 26-39.

7.

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.

8.

Balota D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.

9.

Balota D. A., Cortese, Sergent-Marshall, Spieler. & Melvin J. Yap (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283-316.

10.

Balota, D. A., Ferraro, F. R., Connor, L. T. (1991). on the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In: P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The Psychology of Word Meanings, 187-218.

11.

Broadbent, D. E. (1967). Lexical representations of derivational relations. In: M. Aranoff, & M. Kean(Eds), Juncture, 37-55, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood(Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, 125-148, Oxford, England: Elsevier.

13.

Chumbley, J. I., & Balota, D. A. (1984). A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 12, 590-606.

14.

Evett, L. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1981). The use of abstract graphemic information in lexical access. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 325-350.

15.

Foster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1109-1115.

16.

Foster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.

17.

Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.

18.

Hutchinson, K. A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A micro-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 785-813.

19.

Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & psychophysics, 40, 431-439.

20.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.

21.

Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of pst, present, and future words on fixation duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1359(1), 12-35.

22.

McGinnies, E., Comer, P. B. & Lacey, O. L. (1952). Visual-recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 65-69.

23.

Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 16, 268-281.

24.

Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: D. Besner, & G. Humphreys (Eds), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, 236-264, Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

25.

New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 45-52.

26.

Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.

27.

Pollatsek A., Juhasz B., Reichle & Rayner K. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 726-750.

28.

Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A., (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & psychophysics, 40, 123-130.

29.

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.

30.

Rayner, K., Ashby, J. A., Pollatsek A. & Reichle, E.D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732.

31.

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.

32.

Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements. Vision Research, 16, 829-837.

33.

Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1992). Eye movement control in reading: Evidence against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 163-172.

34.

Rayner, K., Sereno & Raney (1996). Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol.22, No.5, 1188-1200.

35.

Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476.

36.

Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. & O;Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation duration reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.

37.

Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.

38.

Yap, M. J. & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502-529.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책