바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.22 No.3

Citation Share

즉시순차기억에서의 조음억제: 외현적 조음억제는 음성하 시연을 차단하는가?

Articulatory Suppression in Immediate Serial Recall: Does Overt Suppression Suppress Subvocal Rehearsal?

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.3, pp.311-335
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.3.004
정용석 (진주교육대학교)
김정오 (서울대학교)
정용석, & 김정오. (2010). 즉시순차기억에서의 조음억제: 외현적 조음억제는 음성하 시연을 차단하는가?. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(3), 311-335, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.3.004

초록

본고에서는 Baddeely(2000)의 작업기억 모형에서 외현적 조음억제가 조음체제의 음성하 시연을 상당부분 차단할 수 있다는 가정에 대해 제기되는 두 가지 문제, 즉 1)언어중재이론에서 제안되는 외현적 조음억제와 음성하 조음억제의 차이의 문제와, 2)조음억제 과정에서 조음체제의 음성하 시연과 중앙처리장치의 주의체제에 의한 시연 즉 주의재생(attentional refreshing)과의 상호작용의 문제(Camos, Lager, & Barrouillet, 2009)를 밝히고자 하였다. 이를 위해 본고에서는 조음억제의 유형을 고려하고 조음체제와 주의체제의 상호작용을 고려하여, 단순기억, 외현적 조음억제, 음성하 조음억제, 주의억제, 주의억제+음성하 조음억제의 다섯 개의 기억조건을 구성하였고, 이 조건들이 즉시순차기억과제의 수행에 미치는 영향을 비교하였다. 연구결과를 보면, 첫째, 즉시순차기억에서 외현적 조음억제는 음성하 조음억제에 비해 부정적인 영향을 미치며, 둘째, 주의억제+음성하 조음억제는 주의억제 또는 음성하 조음억제에 비해 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본고의 결과 및 논의로부터 즉시순차기억에서 외현적 조음억제는 음성하 시연에 대한 조음억제의 부정적 효과를 과도하게 일반화 하며, 음성하 시연에 대한 외현적 조음억제의 부정적인 효과는 음성하 시연과 주의재생의 상호작용에 의해 감소된다는 결론을 도출하였다.

keywords
Working memory, Articulatory suppression, Attentional refreshing suppression, Episodic buffer, Attention refreshing, 작업기억, 조음억제, 주의억제, 일화적 완충기, 주의재생

Abstract

The present study tried to clarify two issues derived from the assumption that overt suppression substantially suppress subvocal rehearsal in articulatory system in Baddeley's model, which are whether overt suppression has the same negative effect on subvocal rehearsal in articulatory system as subvocal suppression has, and whether there exists the interplay between two mechanisms of maintenance of verbal information, that is, subvocal rehearsal and attentional refreshing postulated in Camos, Lager, and Barrouillet's study(2009), in immediate serial recall tasks. We manipulated five suppression conditions including no suppression, overt suppression, subvocal suppression, attentional refreshing suppression, attentional refreshing suppression plus subvocal suppression, and evaluated five conditions' effects on immediate serial recall tasks. The results are as follows. First, overt articulatory suppression had more negative effect on immediate serial recall tasks than subvocal articulatory suppression had. Second, attentional refreshing suppression plus subvocal suppression had more negative effect on immediate serial recall tasks than each of subvocal articulatory suppression and attentional refreshing suppression had. Conclusions are that overt suppression overgeneralizes articulatory suppression's negative effects on subvocal rehearsal and overt suppression's effect on subvocal rehearsal in immediate serial recall tasks is diminished by the interplay between subvocal rehearsal and attentional refreshing.

keywords
Working memory, Articulatory suppression, Attentional refreshing suppression, Episodic buffer, Attention refreshing, 작업기억, 조음억제, 주의억제, 일화적 완충기, 주의재생

참고문헌

1.

서상규 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘빈도-빈도 7이상-. 연세대학교 언어정보개발원.

2.

Alloway, T. P., Kerr, I., & Langheinrich, T. (2010). The effect of articulatory suppression and manual tapping on serial recall. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(2), 297-305.

3.

Baddeley, A. (1968). How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 249-264.

4.

Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.

5.

Baddeley, A. (2003a). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208.

6.

Baddeley, A. (2003b). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.

7.

Baddeley, A., Eldridge, M., & Lewis, V. (1981). The role of subvocalization in reading. The Quartly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 439-454.

8.

Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C.(1998). The phonological loop as a languag learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158-173.

9.

Baddeley, A., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 586-595.

10.

Baddeley, A., & Tomson A., & Buchman, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575-589.

11.

Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. A. (1985). Phnological coding and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 490-502.

12.

Besner, D., Davies, J., & Danels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.

13.

Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1995). On the nature of the phonological output planning process involved in verbal rehearsal: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 48, 191-220.

14.

Camos, V., Lagner, P., & Barrouilet, P. (2009). Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 457-469.

15.

Camp, B. W., & Bash, M. A. (1981). Think aloud: Primary level. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

16.

Chen, Z., & Cowan, N. (2009). Core verbal working memory capacity: The limit in words retained without covert articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(7), 1420-1429.

17.

Chincota, D., & Underwood, G. (1997). Digit span and articulatory suppression: A cross-linguistic comparison. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 89-96.

18.

Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E., & Trollope, J. (1990). Articulatory suppression and phonological codes in reading for meaning. The Quartly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A(2), 375-399.

19.

Cowan, N., & Kail, R. (1996). Covert processes and their development in short term memory. In S. E. Gathercole(Ed.), Models of short-term memory(pp29-50). Hove, England: Psychology Press.

20.

Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 23, 83-84.

21.

Gathercole, S. E., & Adams, A. M. (1991). Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology. 29(4), 770-778.

22.

Gathercole, S. E., & Hitch, G. J. (1993). Developmental changes in short term memory: A revised working memory perspective. In A. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, M. A., Conway, P. E. Morris(Ed.), Theories of memory(pp.189-210). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Hasselmo, M. E., & Stern, C. E. (2006). Mechanism underlying working memory for novel information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11). 487-493.

24.

Hudjetz. A., & Oberauer, K.(2007). The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: Testing four models of the complex span paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1675-1684.

25.

Kholberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39, 691-763.

26.

Larsen, J. D., & Baddeley, A. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do you have a common source? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A(8). 1249-1268.

27.

Levy, B. A. (1971). Role of articulation in auditory and visual short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 123-132.

28.

Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Liveright.

29.

Meichenbaum D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification. New York: Plenum Press.

30.

Miller, K. (1979). Noise and the rehearsal-masking hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 565-577.

31.

Murray(1968). Articulatory and acostic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78(4), 679-684.

32.

Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331-347.

33.

Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., Mitchell, K. J., Greene, E. J., & Johnson, M. R.(2007). Refreshing: A minimal executive function, Cortex, 43, 15-145.

34.

Saeki, E., Saito, S., & Kawaguchi, J. (2006). Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching. Memory, 14(8), 965-976.

35.

Salame, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.

36.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

37.

Wilding, J., & White, W. (1985). Impairment of rhyme judgements by silent and overt articulatory suppression. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 95-107.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책