바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.4
Citation Share

Reinterpretation of Characteristics of Explicit Memory Retrieval Shown in Medial Temporal Lobe-lesioned Patients: Review of the Systems Consolidation Theory

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2010, v.22 no.4, pp.549-571
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.007

(2010). Reinterpretation of Characteristics of Explicit Memory Retrieval Shown in Medial Temporal Lobe-lesioned Patients: Review of the Systems Consolidation Theory. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(4), 549-571, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.007
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Explicit information for memory is believed to be stored relatively stable after its conversion to a long-term memory(LTM) in the hippocampus, following the organism's elaborative processing of it. Systems (re)consolidation addresses the importance of dynamic properties of explicit LTM, and consequently has attracted modern memory researchers. According to this theory, the engram of the explicit LTM formed in the hippocampus transfers gradually to the cerebral cortex as the memory consolidates. When reactivated, the engram tends to return to the hippocampus, leading to the integration of additional pieces of information, and then is retransmitted up to the cerebral cortex. Although considerable neuropsychological data underlying this theory have been obtained from medial temporal lobe-lesioned patients including H.M., modern memory-related researches based on these cases have little addressed a possible direct serial linkage of extents of their brain damages to ranges of their failure in retrieving explicit memory. Furthermore, the researches have little reflected the patients' various aspects seen during their memory retrieval onto the dynamic flow of the explicit LTM during systems (re)consolidation. Therefore, the present review, regarding the hippocampus-dependent explicit memory, accounted for the patients' various characteristics of the memory retrieval depending upon their ranges of brain damage, via serial combination of their discrete individual cases on the basis of the systems (re)consolidation theory. The present approach provides a useful framework in reinterpreting these cases dynamically.

keywords
systems (re)consolidation, explicit memory, medial temporal lobe, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, H.M., 시스템 (재)응고화, 외현적 기억, 내측 측두엽, 해마, 대뇌피질, H.M.

Reference

1.

Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spencer & J. T. Spencer (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 2, pp.89-195). New York: Academic Press.

2.

Cohen, N. J. & Eichenbaum, H. E. (1993). Memory, amnesia and hippocampal system. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

3.

Corkin, S., Amaral, D., Gonzalez, R., Johnson, K., & Hyman, B. T. (1997). H.M's medial temporal lobe lesion: Findings from magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3964-3979.

4.

Corkin, S, Sullivan, E. V., Twitchell, T. E., & Grove, E. (1981). The amnesic patient H. M.: Clinical observations and test performance 28 years after operation. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 7, 235.

5.

Debiec, J., LeDoux, J. E., & Nader, K. (2002). Cellular and systems reconsolidation in the hippocampus. Neuron, 36, 527-538.

6.

Dudai, Y. (2004). The neurobiology consolidation, or how stable is the engram? Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 51-86.

7.

Eichenbaum, H. E. & Cohenbaum, N. J. (2001). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

8.

Eichenbaum, H. E., Stewart, C. & Morris, R. G. M. (1990). Hippoampal representation in spatial learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 331-339.

9.

Frankland, P. W., & Bontempi, B. (2005). The organization of recent and remote memories. Nature Reviews, 6, 119-130.

10.

Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2009). Cognitive Neurosceince(3rd Ed.). Learning and Memory, pp.312-363. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Ltd.

11.

Gusev, P. A. & Gubin, A. N. (2010). Recent and remote memory recalls modulate different sets of stereotypical interlaminar correlations in Arc/Arg3.1 mRNA expression in cortical areas. Brain Research, 1352, 118-139.

12.

Lavenex, P. & Amaral, D. G. (2000). Hippocampal -neocortical interaction: A hierarchy of associativity. Hippocampus, 10, 420-430.

13.

Lechner, H. A., Squire, L R. & Byrne, J. H. (1999). 100 years of consolidation: Remembering Muller and Pilzecker. Learning and Memory, 6, 77-87.

14.

Maviel, T., Durkin, T. P., Menzaghi, F., & Bontempi, B.(2004). Sites of neocortical reorganization critical for remote spatial memory. Science, 305, 96-99.

15.

Milner, B. (1965). Memory disturbances after bilateral hippocampal lesions. In P. Milner & S. Glickman (Eds.), Cognitive process and the brain(pp.104-105). Princeton, NJ: D.Van Nostrand.

16.

Milner, B., Corkin, S., & Teuber, H. L. (1968). Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M. Neuropsychologia, 6, 317-338.

17.

Murre, J. MJ., Graham, K. S. & Hodges, J. R (2001). Semantic dementia: Relevance to connectionist models of long-term memory. Brain, 124, 647-675.

18.

Nadel, L., & Moscovitch, M. (1997). Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7(2), 217-227.

19.

Nader, K. (2003). Memory trace unbound. Trends in Neuroscience, 26(2), 65-72.

20.

Pan, X. & Tsukada, M. (2006). A model of the hippocampal-cortical memory system. Biological Cybernetics, 95, 159-167.

21.

Reed, J. M., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Retrograde amnesia for facts and events: Findings from four new cases. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(10), 3943-3954.

22.

Remondes, M., & Schuman, E. M. (2004). Role for cortical input to hippocampal area CA1 in the consolidation of a long-term memory. Nature, 431, 699-703.

23.

Rempel-Clower, N. L., Zola, S. M., Squire, L. R. & Amaral D, G, (1996). Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to hippocampal formation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16(16), 5233-5255.

24.

Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 20, 11-21.

25.

Smith, C. N., & Squire, L. R. (2009). Medial temporal lobe activity during retrieval of semanticmemory is related to the age of the memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(4), 930-938.

26.

Squire, L. R. (1987). ECT and memory loss. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 997-1001.

27.

Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and hippocampus: A synthesis from findings from rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195-231.

28.

Sutherland, R. J., Sparks, F. T., & Lehmann, H. (2010). Hippocampus and retrograde amnesia in the rat model: A modest proposal for the situation of systems consolidation. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2357-2369.

29.

Sutherland, R. J., Whishaw, I. Q. & Kolb, B. (1983). A behavioral analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate-or colchicine-induced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Behavioral Brain Research, 7, 133-153.

30.

Takashima, A., Nieuwenhuis, I. L. C., Jensen, O., Talamini, L. M., & Rijpkema, M. (2009). Shift from hippocampal to neocortical centered retrieval network with consolidation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(32), 10087-10093.

31.

Takashima, A., Peterson, K. M., Rutters, F., Tendolkar, I., Jensen, O., Zwarts, M. J., McNaughton, B. L. (2006). Declarative memory consolidation in humans: A prospective functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy and Sciences, 103(3), 756-761.

32.

Teng, E. & Squire, L. R. (1999). Memory for places learned long ago is intact after hippocampal damage. Nature, 400, 675-677.

33.

Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory, pp.382-403. New York: Academic Press.

34.

Van Strien, N. M., Cappaert, N. L. M., & Witter, M. P. (2009). The anatomy of memory: An interactive overview of the parahippocampal -hippocampal network. Nature Reviews, 10, 272-282.

35.

Wang, S.-H., & Morris, R. G. M. (2010). Hippocampal-neocortical interactions in memory formation, consolidation and reconsolidation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 49-79.

36.

Winograd, T. (1975). Frame representations and declarative-procedural controversy. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press.

37.

Wiltgen, B. J., Brown, R. A. M., Talton, L. E., & Silva, A. J. (2004). New circuits for old memories: the role of the neocortex in consolidation. Neuron, 44, 101-108.

38.

Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R. & Amaral, D. G. (1986). Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 6(10), 2950-2967.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy