바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.23 No.3

Citation Share

얼굴 심상 순응으로 유발된 성별 잔여효과와 개인차에 따른 순응 양상

Gender aftereffects from mental imagery of faces and individual differences

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.3, pp.355-373
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.3.004
어강용 (연세대학교)
정상철 (연세대학교)
어강용, & 정상철. (2011). 얼굴 심상 순응으로 유발된 성별 잔여효과와 개인차에 따른 순응 양상. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(3), 355-373, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.3.004

초록

얼굴 순응 패러다임 중 하나인 성별 잔여효과(gender aftereffects)는 특정성별(남성 혹은 여성)의 얼굴에 순응이 되면 뒤이어 제시된 중성 얼굴을 더 빈번하게 반대되는 성별의 얼굴(여성 혹은 남성)로 지각하게 되는 현상을 말한다. 본 연구는 심상 순응으로 유도한 성별 잔여효과를 측정하였다. 실험 결과, 참가자 전체의 조건 별 비교에서는 여성 심상 조건보다 남성 심상 조건에서 검사자극을 더 빈번히 남성 얼굴로 지각하였다. 이 결과는 심상과 지각이 반대되는 순응 효과를 보여주고 있다는 것을 시사한다. 그러나 참가자 개인 별로 조건 간 비교를 하면, 참가자들을 심상 순응 양상에 따라 네 집단으로 분류가 가능하였다. 심상 순응 양상에 따라 다른 집단으로 분류가 가능하다는 것은 개인차에 따라 얼굴 심상 순응 양상이 달라질 수 있음을 시사한다. 그러므로 심상 순응 효과를 측정할 때는 반드시 참가자 개인의 특성을 고려해야 한다.

keywords
gender aftereffects, mental imagery, adaptation, face, 성별 잔여효과, 심상, 순응, 얼굴

Abstract

Prior exposure to a specific gender changes perception of subsequent gender in face perception (gender aftereffects). The current study investigated the nature of gender aftereffects from visual imagery. We found that the ambiguous faces were categorized as male more often after visualizing male faces than after visualizing female faces. Seemingly this result suggests that imagery adaptation has the opposite effects as compared to perceptual adaptation. However, when individual data was separately analyzed, each participant was categorized into four distinctive groups depending on the direction of aftereffects. Specifically, some participants showed imagery aftereffects just like perceptual aftereffects, whereas others showed the opposite trends. This result suggests that the effects of imagery adaptation can be different depending on individual's ability to visualize. Therefore, individual differences should be considered when measuring the effects of imagery adaptation.

keywords
gender aftereffects, mental imagery, adaptation, face, 성별 잔여효과, 심상, 순응, 얼굴

참고문헌

1.

정일영, 이창현, 이미선, 정상철. (2009). 맥락 정보가 심적 회전에 미치는 영향. 인지과학, 20(4), 555-571.

2.

Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of Face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 (6), 551-565.

3.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

4.

Brandt, S. A., Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous Eye Movements During Visual Imagery Reflect the Content of the Visual Scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (1), 27-38.

5.

Chung, C., OH, K., Lee, Y., & Byun, H. (1998). Development of a “Gamsung” measurement system and a database for facial expressions and gestures (Tech. Rep. No. G-17-01-09). Korea: Ministry of Science and Technology.

6.

Cui, X., Jeter, C. B., Yang, D., Montague, P. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2007). Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Research, 47 (4), 474-478.

7.

DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., & Little, A. C. (2010). Opposite effects of visual versus imagined presentation of faces on subsequent sex perception. Visual Cognition, 18 (6), 816-828.

8.

Eimer, M., Kiss, M., & Nicholas, S. (2010). Response Profile of the Face-Sensitive N170 Component: A Rapid Adaptation Study. Cerebral Cortex, 20 (10), 2442-2452.

9.

Farah, M. J. (1989). The neural basis of mental imagery. Trend in NeuroScience, 12 (10), 395-399.

10.

Finke, R. A. (1980). Level of equivalence in imagery and perception. Psychological Review, 87 (2), 113-132.

11.

Ganis, G., & Schendan, H. E. (2008). Visual mental imagery and perception produce opposite adaptation effects on early brain potentials. NeuroImage, 42, 1714-1727.

12.

Hurlbert, A. (2001). Trading faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 3-5.

13.

Jeffreys, D. A. (1989). A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp. Experimental Brain Research, 78 (1), 193-202.

14.

Kovacs, G., Zimmer, M., Banko, E., Harza, I., Antal, A., & Vidnyanszky, Z. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 742-753.

15.

Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and Mind. Harvard University Press.

16.

Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001). NEURAL FOUNDATIONS OF IMAGERY. Neuroscience, 2, 635-642.

17.

Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2000). Imagery neurons in the human brain. Nature, 48, 357-361.

18.

Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.

19.

Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Müller, K. M., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of The Royal Society, 272, 897-904.

20.

Marks, D. F. (1972). Individual differences in the vividness of visual imagery and their effect on function. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp.83-108). NewYork: Academic Press.

21.

Michelon, P., Zacks, J. M. (2003). What is primed in priming from imagery?. Psychological Research, 67, 71-79.

22.

Moradi, F., Koch, C., & Shimojo, S. (2005). Face Adaptation Depends on Seeing the Face. Neuron, 45, 169-175.

23.

O’Craven, K. M., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (6), 1013-1023.

24.

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

25.

Pearson, J., Clifford, C. W. G., & Tong F. (2008). The Functional Impact of Mental Imagery on Conscious Perception. Current Biology, 18, 982-986.

26.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.

27.

Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Jaquet, E., Winkler, C., & Clifford, W. G. (2004). Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms. Current Biology, 14, 2119-2123.

28.

Rodway, P., Gillies, K., & Schepman, A. (2006). Vivid Imagers Are Better at Detecting Salient Changes. Journal of Individual Differences, 27 (4), 218-228.

29.

Ryu, J., Borrmann, K., Chaudhuri, A. (2008). Imagine Jane and Identify John: Face Identity Aftereffects Induces by Imageined Faces. PLos ONE, 3 (5), 1-8.

30.

Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1994). Visual imagery: an interaction between memory retrieval and focal attention. TREND in NeuroScience, 17 (7), 287-289.

31.

Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240-251.

32.

Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (2001). Perception. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

33.

Shepard, R. N. (1978). The Mental Image. American Psychologist, 33, 125-137.

34.

Shin, K., Stolte, M., & Chong C. (2009). The effect of spatial attention on invisible stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysic, 71 (7), 1507-1513.

35.

Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. (2003). Pulling faces: an investigation of the face distortion aftereffect. Perception, 32, 1109-1116.

36.

Webster, M. A., & MacLin, L. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-653.

37.

Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561.

38.

Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001a). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313.

39.

Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001b). The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1314-1329.

40.

Winamer, J., Huk, A. C., Boroditsky, L. (2010). A motion aftereffect from visual imagery of motion. Cognition, 114, 276-284.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책