바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.4

Citation Share

Verification of Simon effect and Muller-Lyer illusion: Comparison of action and perception using Kinect

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.4, pp.623-637
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.009


& (2011). Verification of Simon effect and Muller-Lyer illusion: Comparison of action and perception using Kinect. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 23(4), 623-637, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.009

Abstract

We examined the temporal and spatial resolution of Kinect which is a motion sensing input device manufactured by Microsoft. Specifically, two experiments were conducted to verify Simon effect and Muller-Lyer illusion by measuring quantitative behavior using Kinect. The purpose of experimental 1 was to evaluate the temporal resolution of Kinect in a Simon effect task. Simon effects were observed in both of the keyboard condition and the Kinect condition. In experimental 2, participants were asked to judge the length of the Mueller-Lyer test line compared to the comparison line either by perception or hand action. In the Kinect condition, hand-action judgement of the line increased with the line length linearly. More importantly, the hand-action condition did not show significant illusions while the perception condition showed significant illusions. This result suggests that Kinect could be a useful tool to explore a possible gap between perception and action. Finally, several methodological problems and future developments of the Kinect system were discussed.

keywords
Kinect, Simon effect, Muller-Lyer Illusion, perception and action, 키넥트, 사이먼 효과, 뮐러-라이어, 착시, 행동측정

Reference

1.

김지원, 박병규, 홍정화, 엄광문 (2008). 실버/재활 공학의 연구 동향 및 전망. 공업화학전망, 11(2), 11-23.

2.

이정희, 이영희, 차의영 (2011). 영상처리를 이용한 ADHD 측정도구. 한국컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 14(2), 95-102.

3.

홍성규, 고승범, 조승철, 윤준식, 이승화, 박건우, 이대희 (2005). 3차원 보행분석시스템을 이용한 파킨슨병 환자의 보행 분석. 대한신경과학회지, 23(5), 635-641.

4.

Abrahamse, E., & Lubbe, R. (2008). Endogenous orienting modulates the Simon effect: critical factors in experimental design. Psychological Research, 72(3), 261-272.

5.

Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5(6), 679- 685.

6.

Day, R. H. (1989). Natural and artificial cues, perceptual compromise and the basis of veridical and illusory perception. In D. Vickers & P, L, Smith (Eds.), Human information processing: Measures and mechanisms (pp.107-129). North Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

7.

Day, R. H. (1990). The Bourdon illusion in haptic space. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 400-404.

8.

DeLucia, P., & Hochberg, J. (1985). Illusions in the real world and in the mind’s eye. Proceeding of the Eastern Psychological Association, 56, 38.

9.

DeLucia, P., & Hochberg, J. (1986). Real-world geometrical illusions: Theoretical and practical implications. Proceeding of the Eastern Psychological Association, 57, 62.

10.

DeLucia, P., & Hochberg, J. (1991). Geometrical illusions in solid objects under ordinary viewing conditions. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 547-554.

11.

Forster, K., & Forster, J. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 35(1), 116-124.

12.

Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Gregory, R. L. (1997). Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1358), 1121-1127.

14.

Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189-202.

15.

Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2005). The Müller- Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(4), 1234-1239.

16.

Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201- 211.

17.

Kaufman, L., & Kaufman, J. H. (2000). Explaining the moon illusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(1), 500-505.

18.

Lecklider, T. (2011). Your Scope Needs a Natural User Interface. EE: Evaluation Engineering, 50 (1), 12-22.

19.

Lee, D., & Aronson, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 15 (3), 529-532.

20.

Leyvand, T., Meekhof, C., Yi-Chen Wei, Jian Sun, & Baining Guo. (2011). Kinect Identity: Technology and Experience. Computer, 44(4), 94-96.

21.

Loomis, J., Blascovich, J., &Beall, A. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, 31(4), 557-564.

22.

Schrater, P. R., Knill, D. C., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000). Mechanisms of visual motion detection. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 64.

23.

Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of experimental psychology, 81, 174-176.

24.

Simon, J. R., & Wolf, J. D. (1963). Choice reaction times as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6, 99-105.

25.

Suma, E. A., Lange, B., Rizzo, A., Krum, D. M., & Bolas, M. (2011). FAAST: The Flexible Action and Articulated Skeleton Toolkit. Virtual Reality Conference (VR), 2011 IEEE (pp 247-248).

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy