바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

다양한 사회 집단의 입장에서의 암묵적 연합의 측정

Measuring Implicit Associations from Perspectives of Various Social Groups

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2015, v.27 no.3, pp.451-479
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2015.27.3.006
이향수 (충북대학교)
김현정 (충북대학교)
박영옥 (충북대학교)
박상희 (충북대학교)

초록

본 연구에서는 자신이 아닌 다른 사람들의 입장에서 다양한 사회적 범주들에 대한 선호의 암묵적 연합(“암묵적 메타 태도”)이 존재하는지를 살펴보았다. 구체적으로 이 연구에서는 한국인 대학생들을 참가자로 하여 특정 외집단(흑인 또는 백인 집단)의 구성원들이 자신들의 내집단과 외집단에 가질 것으로 예상되는 선호에 대한 암묵적인 연합들을 측정하고 이 측정들을 서로 비교하였다. 암묵적 연합의 측정을 위해 연구 1에서는 암묵적 연합 검사를 변형한 과제를 사용하여 참가자들이 흑인과 백인 집단에 대해 자신이 가지고 있는, 또는 전형적인 흑인 또는 전형적인 백인이 가지고 있을 것으로 예상되는 선호를 측정하였다. 연구 2에서는 단축형 암묵적 연합 검사를 변형한 과제를 사용하여 본인, 흑인, 백인 입장에서의 세 가지 연합을 각 참가자로부터 모두 측정하였으며, 아울러 각각에 대응하는 외현적 신념도 측정하였다. 연구 결과 예측한 바와 같이 흑인 또는 백인의 입장에서 측정한 암묵적 연합은 해당 집단에게 우호적인 쪽으로 편향이 나타남이 확인되었다. 본인의 입장에서 측정한 암묵적 연합은 흑인/백인 입장에서 측정한 것들 사이에 위치하였다. 외현적 태도와의 관계는 일관적으로 나타나지 않았다. 이 연구에서는 본인이 속하지 않은 사회적 범주의 입장에서도 타 집단에 대한 선호의 암묵적 연합이 표상되어 측정될 수 있음을 보였다.

keywords
implicit association, automatic processes, intergroup bias, prejudice, 암묵적 연합, 자동적 과정, 집단간 편향, 편견

Abstract

We examined whether there exist implicit associations of preferences from perspectives of nonself people toward various social categories (“implicit meta-attitude”). Using Korean undergraduate participants we measured implicit associations about the attitudes that members of specific outgroups (Black or White racial groups) are expected to have towards their ingroup or an outgroup and compared these measures with each other. To measure implicit associations, we used a modified Implicit Association Test in Study 1, and a modified Brief Implicit Association Test in Study 2. In Study 1, we measured the implicit associations that participants themselves have, or a typical Black or White person would have, toward Black or White racial groups. In Study 2 we measured all these three kinds of associations from same participants as well as their explicit counterparts. Supporting our prediction, implicit associations from the perspectives of a Black or a White person were comparatively more favorable to the respective ingroup; the association measured from the self’s perspective fell between these two. Relationships with explicit attitudes did not show a consistent pattern. We demonstrated that implicit associations from perspectives of social categories one does not belong to can be mentally represented and measured.

keywords
implicit association, automatic processes, intergroup bias, prejudice, 암묵적 연합, 자동적 과정, 집단간 편향, 편견

참고문헌

1.

권준모 (2001). 암묵적 및 명시적 심리과정 - 연구와 응용: 명시적/암묵적 태도이론과 측정방법. 한국심리학회 추계심포지엄, 2001(0), 48-62.

2.

나은영, 권준모 (2002). 암묵적 연합 검사에 의한 지역 편견의 강도 측정 및 응용: 사투리 음성자극의 효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(1), 51-74.

3.

노경란, 방희정 (2008). 한국 대학생과 외국대학생 간에 사회집단에 대한 명시적 및 암묵적 태도의 차이: 인종범주를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지 연차학술발표대회 논문집, 2008, 154-155.

4.

안상수, 김혜숙, 안미영 (2004). 내ㆍ외집단 규범정보가 외현 및 암묵적 편견에 미치는 통제적 영향: 성 편견과 지역 편견을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 155-186.

5.

이훈구, 홍영오 (2001). 암묵적 연합검사에 의한 지역 편견의 측정. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(1), 185-204.

6.

Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 340-353. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.87.3.340

7.

Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Wyer Jr., R. S., & Srull, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vols. 1-2, pp.1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

8.

Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462-479. doi:10.1037/0003- 066X.54.7.462

9.

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230-244. doi:10.1037//0022- 3514.71.2.230

10.

Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 893-910. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.893

11.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed). New York: Academic Press.

12.

Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 469-487. http://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469

13.

Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314-1329. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1314

14.

Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A. G., Brown, A. S., Gray, N. S., & Snowden, R. J. (2010). Faking of the Implicit Association Test is statistically detectable and partly correctable. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 302-314. http://doi.org/10.1080/01973533. 2010.519236

15.

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5

16.

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510-540. doi:10.1006/ jesp.1997.1331

17.

Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327-339. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327

18.

Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229-238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229

19.

Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio S. L. Gaertner (Ed.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp.61-89). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.

20.

Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-Taking and Self-Other Overlap: Fostering Social Bonds and Facilitating Social Coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 109-124. doi:10.1177/1368430205051060

21.

Graf, P., & Masson, M. E. J. (Eds.). (1993). Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.

22.

Greenwald, A. G. (2012). Studies showing uses of the IAT with “real-world” subject populations. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/ agg/pdf/Real-world_samples.pdf

23.

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

24.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74. 6.1464

25.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.85.2.197

26.

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17-41. doi:10.1037/a0015575

27.

Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369-1385. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613

28.

Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14(6), 640-643.

29.

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513-541.

30.

Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 349-364. doi:10.1037/h0031617

31.

Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774-788. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.774

32.

Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Greenwald, A. G., Simard, D., Pontiero, J., Brnjas, A., … Dovidio, J. F. (2012). In perfect harmony: Synchronizing the self to activated social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 562-575. doi:10.1037/ a0025970

33.

Kim, D. -Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 83. http://doi.org/ 10.2307/3090143

34.

Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp.59-102). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

35.

Lun, J., Sinclair, S., Whitchurch, E. R., & Glenn, C. (2007). (Why) do I think what you think? Epistemic social tuning and implicit prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 957-972. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6. 957

36.

McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435-442. http://doi.org/ 10.1006/jesp.2000.1470

37.

Mitchell, J. P., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 455-469. doi:10.1037/0096- 3445.132.3.455

38.

Nock, M. K., Park, J. M., Finn, C. T., Deliberto, T. L., Dour, H. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2010). Measuring the suicidal mind: Implicit cognition predicts suicidal behavior. Psychological Science, 21(4), 511-517. doi:10.1177/0956797610364762

39.

Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 565-584. doi:10.1037/0096- 3445.134.4.565

40.

Nosek, B. A., & Hansen, J. J. (2008). Personalizing the Implicit Association Test increases explicit evaluation of target concepts. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 226-236.

41.

Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 152-159. doi:10.1016/j.tics. 2011.01.005

42.

Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., … Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36-88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053

43.

Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 653-667. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5. 653

44.

Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 421-433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004

45.

Payne, B. K., & Gawronski, B. (2010). A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going? In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp.1-15).

46.

Ranganath, K. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). Implicit attitude generalization occurs immediately; explicit attitude generalization takes time. Psychological Science, 19(3), 249-254. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02076.x

47.

Reingold, E. M., & Ray, C. A. (2006). Implicit cognition. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from doi:10.1002/ 0470018860.s00178

48.

Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 501-518. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3. 501

49.

Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641-669. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3. 641

50.

Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.84.1.1

51.

Schuman, H. (Ed.). (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations (Rev. ed). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

52.

Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., & Krysan, M. (1985). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.

53.

Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108-131. doi:10.1207/ S15327957PSPR0402_01

54.

Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The Brief Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Psychologie), 56(4), 283-294. doi:10.1027/ 1618-3169.56.4.283

55.

Valiente, C., Cantero, D., Vázquez, C., Sanchez, Á., Provencio, M., & Espinosa, R. (2011). Implicit and explicit self-esteem discrepancies in paranoia and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 691-699. doi:10.1037/ a0022856

56.

Wallaert, M., Ward, A., & Mann, T. (2010). Explicit control of implicit responses: Simple directives can alter IAT performance. Social Psychology, 41(3), 152-157. http://doi.org/ 10.1027/1864-9335/a000022

57.

Wegner, D. M., & Vallacher, R. R. (1977). Implicit psychology: An introduction to social cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

58.

Yoshida, E., Peach, J. M., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Not all automatic associations are created equal: How implicit normative evaluations are distinct from implicit attitudes and uniquely predict meaningful behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 694-706. doi:10.1016/ j.jesp.2011.09.013

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물