- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1226-9654
- E-ISSN2733-466X
- KCI
성인 스마트폰 중독 경향군의 억제 결함: 읽기 폭 과제와 회귀억제 과제를 활용하여
Inhibition Deficiencies in Adults with Smartphone addiction tendency: Using Reading Span and Inhibition of Return Tasks
박형규 (경북대학교)
장문선 (경북대학교)
곽호완 (경북대학교)
초록
본 연구는 성인 스마트폰 중독 경향군의 인지 및 주의 과정에서 나타나는 억제기제의 결함을 확인하였다. 실험 1에서는 인지 과정 내 억제기제를 확인하기 위해 탐사재인 읽기 폭 과제를 실시하였다. 추가적으로 스마트폰과 관련된/관련되지 않은 단어로 구성된 문장세트를 실험자극으로 사용하여 스마트폰 중독에서 나타나는 반응 특성이 있는지 알아보았다. 실험 결과 첫째, 스마트폰 중독 경향군은 불필요한 정보에 대한 선택적 억제가 나타나지 않았다. 둘째, 스마트폰 중독 경향군은 통제군과 비교하여 스마트폰과 관련되지 않은 정보를 처리할 때 반응시간이 더 길었으나 스마트폰과 관련된 정보를 처리할 때는 반응시간에서 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 이와 같은 결과는 스마트폰 중독 경향군이 작업기억 집행기능의 효율성, 즉 불필요한 정보에 대한 선택적 억제에 어려움이 있고 통제집단과 구분되는 반응 특성이 있음을 보여준다. 실험 2에서는 자동적 주의 과정 내 억제기제를 확인하기 위해 회귀억제 과제를 실시하였다. 실험 결과, 스마트폰 중독 경향군은 통제군에 비해 적은 회귀억제량을 보였다. 두 실험 결과를 종합하면 스마트폰 중독 경향군은 인지 및 주의 과정 내에서 억제기제 활성화의 저하를 보였다. 본 연구의 결과는 통제군과 구별되는 스마트폰 중독 경향군의 특성을 이해하는데 유용하게 이용될 수 있고 이를 바탕으로 스마트폰 중독을 진단하는 지표들을 마련하는데 도움이 될 것으로 생각된다.
- keywords
- 스마트폰 중독, 억제, 읽기 폭 과제, 작업기억, 회귀억제, Smartphone addiction, inhibition, reading span task, working memory, inhibition of return
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the deficit of inhibitory mechanism in cognition and attention process in adults with smartphone addiction tendency. In experiment 1, probe recognition reading span task was conducted to explore inhibition mechanism in cognition process. In addition to, investigate respond characteristic of adults with smartphone addiction tendency, sets of sentences were used as experiment stimuli. The sentences were composed of smartphone related or unrelated words. The result of experiment 1, first, smartphone addiction tendency group did not show selective inhibition for irrelevant information. Second, smartphone addiction tendency group took longer response time when processing smartphone-unrelated information compared to the control group. However, these groups did not show a significant difference in the response when they processe smartphone-related information. These results suggested that smartphone addiction tendency had difficulties in inhibition ability for irrelevant information. It means that efficiency of executive function of working memory is degraded. And also, it showed that there was distinct respond characteristic of smartphone addiction tendency in comparison with control group. In Experiment 2, inhibition of return task was conducted to explore inhibition mechanism in attention process. The result of experiment 2, smartphone addiction tendency group showed less inhibition of return compared to control group. In summary, all of these results suggested that adults with smartphone addiction tendency had decreased inhibition mechanism in cognition and attention process. The result of the present study could be use in understanding the characteristic of smartphone addiction and it will be useful to make a diagnosis of smartphone addiction.
- keywords
- 스마트폰 중독, 억제, 읽기 폭 과제, 작업기억, 회귀억제, Smartphone addiction, inhibition, reading span task, working memory, inhibition of return
참고문헌
Ahn, D. H. (2011, fall). Media effect from evolutionary psychology and neuroscience. Korean Society for Journalism &Communication Studies, 82-83.
Ahn, D. H. (2011). Media effect from evolutionary psychology and neuroscience. Fall 2011Convention, 82-83.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47-89.
Barkley, R. A. (2003). Issues in the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Brain and Development, 25, 77-83.
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
Chen, J., Liang, Y., Mai, C., Zhong, X., & Qu, C. (2016). General deficit in inhibitory control of excessive smartphone users: Evidence from an event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non–linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 449-460.
Cho, H. M. (2011). Introdution of Digital Media and Consequent New Risk Type –Focus on the Analysis of User Risk Perception and Risk Features of Smart Phones as Convergence Media-. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11, 353-364.
Cho, K. J., Song, S. J., & Han, K. H. (2002). The Effects of types of presentation and cognitive load on multimedia learning. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 13, 47-60.
Cho, Y. C., Pack, H. G., Chang, M. S., & Kwak, H. W. (2016). Attentional bias toward smartphone-relevant stimuli in smartphone addictive tendency: Using Comparison Blindness Task. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28, 25-43.
Cohen, E. (2011). Does life online give you popcorn brain. Retrieved from CNN Health website: http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/06/23/tech.popcorn.brain.ep/index.html.
Collette, F., Salmon, E., Van der Linden, M., Chicherio, C., Belleville, S., Degueldre, C., Delfiore, G., & Franck, G. (1999). Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 411-417.
Cowan, N. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 154-176.
Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45-75.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2009). Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324, 646-648.
Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 163.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193-225.
Hwang, K. H., Yoo, Y. S., & Cho, O. H. (2012). Smartphone Overuse and Upper Extremity Pain, Anxiety, Depression, and Interpersonal Relationships among College Students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12, 365-375.
Hwang, Y. J., & Kim, H. J. (2013). A Study on Side Effects and Variation from Smart-phone Diffused. The Society of Convergence Knowledge, 1, 83-90.
Jeon, H. Y., Hyun, M. H., & Chun, Y. M. (2011). The Characteristic of Frontal Lobe’s Executive Function in Internet Addiction. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 215-229.
Jeong, J. Y., Chang, M. S., & Kwak, H. W. (2008). Inhibition of Return and Response Inhibition Deficits in Adults with ADHD Tendency. Korean Journal of Psychology:General, 27, 179-196.
Kalenscher, T., Ohmann, T., & Güntürkün, O. (2006). The neuroscience of impulsive and self-controlled decisions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 203-211.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
Kang, H. Y., & Park, C. H. (2012). Develpoment and Validation of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory. Korean Journal of Psychology:General, 31, 563-580.
Kim, B. Y., Ko, E. J., & Choi, H. G. (2013). A study on factors affection smart-phone addiction in university students: A focus on differences in classifying risk groups. Studies on Korean Youth, 24, 67-98
Kim, D. H., Lee, K. E., Lee, Y. J., Cha, S. H., Lim, S. H., Kwon, H. M., & Han, M. A. (2013). The Association between Smart Phone Addiction and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder among Some College Students. Journal of the Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health, 17, 105-112.
Kim, E. M., Shim, M. S., Kim, B. Y., & Oh, H. Y. (2012). The Mediatization of Everyday Life: Focus Group Interviews of “Smart”Media Users. Korean Society for Journalism and Communication Studies, 56, 133-159.
Kim, H. B. (2013). Research Trends in Smart Phone Addiction. Korean Association of Addiction Crime, 3, 74-89.
Kim, H. S., & Yum, S. H. (2002). Effects of Prior Knowledge, Working Memory, and Types of Linear Texts on Textbase and Situation Model Comprehension. Korean Association for Educational Information and Broadcasting, 7, 5-32.
Kim, K., H. (2006). Addiction and Self-Regulation:A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 63-105.
Kim, M. S., & Han, K. H. (2012). The effect of mobile screen size and working memory capacity on text comprehension. Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 878-881.
Kim, S. H. (2010). Effect of Perceived Attributes on the Purchase Intention of Smart-Phone. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10, 318-326.
Kim, S. J., & Kim, K. H. (2013). Cognitive Approach to Internet Addiction Improvement:Focused on Solution of Craving and Loss of Control. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 421-443
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
Korea National Information Society Agency. (2012, March 30). Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale For Youth and Adults: 2011 year version. Korea National Information Society Agency, Retrieved from http://www.nia.or.kr/
Korea National Information Society Agency. (2015, June 24). 2014 Internet Addiction Research on the actual condition. Korea National Information Society Agency, Retrieved from http://www.nia.or.kr/bbs/board_view.asp?BoardID=201408061323065914&id=15626&Order=020303&search_target=&keyword=&Flag=020000&nowpage=1&objpage=0
Krugman Herbert, E. (1970). Electroencephalographic Aspects of Low Involvement. New York, NY:American Association for Public Opinion Research.
KT. (2015). Mobile trends in the first half of 2015 report.
Kwak, H. (1996). Mechanism of inhibitory attention revealed by ‘Inhibition of Return’effect. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognition Psychology, 8, 133-145
Kwak, H. W., Park, C. H., Lee, T. Y., Kim, M. S., & Jin, Y. S. (2008). Glossary of Experiment Psychology. Seoul: Sigmapress.
Lee, J. M., Kim, M. S., Kim, M. S., Ryou, M. H., Kim, J. O., Byun, E. H., Park, T. J., Kim, S. I., Yi, K. O., Kim, Y. J., Lee, J. H., Shin, H. J., Do, K. S., Lee, Y. A., Park, J. Y., Cho, E. K., Choi, S. S., & Kawk, H. W. (2002). Cognitive Psychology. Seoul:Hakjisa.
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503-507.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81.
Nam, S. C., & Song, K. S. (2011). The Necessity of Studying Information Overload of Smart Device User. Proceedings of The Korea Society of Computer and Information Conference, 15, 63-66.
Nie, J., Zhang, W., Chen, J., & Li, W. (2016). Impaired inhibition and working memory in response to internet-related words among adolescents with internet addiction: A comparison with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 236, 28-34.
Oh, K. T., & Lee, J. E. (2012). The ‘Smart Life’Revolution and Smart Phone Addiction. Internet and Information Security, 3, 21-43.
Oh, S. H., & Ha, E. H. (2014). The Effects of Children’s Executive Function Impairments and ADHD Symptoms on the Issue of Smart Phone Addiction. Korean Journal of Play Therapy, 17, 17-35.
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15583-15587.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1-4.
Pack, Y. M. (2011). A Study on Adult’s Smart Phone Addiction and Mental Heath. Master’s thesis, SangJi University, Kangwon.
Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., Choate, L. S., Hockey, R., & Maylor, E. A. (1984). Sustained concentration: passive filtering or active orienting? In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Ran, R., Park, H. G., Chang. M. S., & Kwak, H. W. (2016). The Association Between ADHD Tendency and the Deficit of Attention and Inhibition of a Group with Smartphone Addiction Tendency - An Analysis Focusing on Emotional cue -. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 28, 593-615.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 469-508.
Seo, S. G., & Kim, H. G. (2004). Frontalexecutive Function in Schizophrenia Patients. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 23, 23-43.
Sereno, A. B. (1992). Programming saccades: The role of attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 89-107). New York, NY: Springer.
Song, H. J., Kwon, M. K., Oh, K. J., Kim, M. S., Ha, E. H., Song, D. H., & Shin, M. S. (2004). Inhibition of Return Deficit of ADHD. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 243-251.
Stoltzfus, E. R., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1996). Working memory and aging: Current status of the inhibitory view. Working Memory and Human Cognition, 66-88.
Stone, L. (2006). Opening Keynote, IDEA2006, Seattle Public Library.
Sweller, J. (1993). Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 1-8.
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
Yoo, H. J., Kim, M. R., & Lee, J. M. (2006). Individual Differences in Working Memory:Inhibition of Irrelevant Information. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 17, 207-229.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수