바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.4

Citation Share

악보의 시각적 요소가 악보 지각에 미치는 영향: 음악적 전문가와 비전문가 비교

Influence of Visual Elements of Score on Score Perception: The Comparison of Music Experts and Non-Experts

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.4, pp.411-422
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.005
이고은 (이화여자대학교)
이혜원 (이화여자대학교)
이고은, & 이혜원. (2017). 악보의 시각적 요소가 악보 지각에 미치는 영향: 음악적 전문가와 비전문가 비교. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 29(4), 411-422, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.005

초록

본 연구에서는 음정과 리듬을 표현하는 악보의 시각적 요소에 따라 악보 지각이 어떻게 달라지는지 음악적 전문가와 비전문가에게서 살펴보았다. 전문가와 비전문가에게 음정만 제시된 악보와 리듬이 함께 제시된 악보를 80ms와 2000ms로 제시한 뒤, 또 하나의 악보를 보여주고 앞서 나온 악보와 같은지 여부를 판단하는 과제를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 리듬을 함께 제시하여 악보가 더 복잡해지면 반응시간이 느려졌다. 전문성에 따른 차이는 악보를 2000ms로 제시한 경우에 나타났는데, 악보가 충분한 시간 동안 제시되었을 때, 전문가들은 리듬이 제시된 악보를 비전문가보다 더 정확히 처리할 수 있었다. 본 결과는 전문가들이 리듬 정보를 더 효율적으로 처리할 수 있으며, 이를 통해 악보 지각에 도움을 받았을 가능성을 시사한다.

keywords
music perception, score perception, pitch, rhythm, music expertise, 음악 인지, 악보 지각, 음정, 리듬, 음악 전문성

Abstract

This study examined how visual elements that represent pitch and rhythm in musical score influence score perception. Music experts and non-experts were presented with two musical scores successively at 80ms or 2000ms. Scores contained only pitch information (pitch condition) or both pitch and rhythm information (rhythm condition). Participants judged whether the two scores were same or different. Response latency was slower when scores were more complicated with the notation of rhythm, than when only pitch was notated. There was a difference between the experts and the non-experts when the score was presented for 2000 ms. When the score was presented for a sufficient amount of time, the experts were able to process the score with rhythm more accurately than the non-experts. This result suggests that music experts can process rhythm information more efficiently to lead to better perception of musical notation.

keywords
music perception, score perception, pitch, rhythm, music expertise, 음악 인지, 악보 지각, 음정, 리듬, 음악 전문성

참고문헌

1.

Arthur, P., Blom, D., & Khuu, S. (2016). Music sight-reading expertise, visually disrupted score and eye movement. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9, 1-12.

2.

Bae, S. Y., Yun, Y. R., Park, S. Y., Kim, K. H., Park, H. R., Kim, M. K., Kim, J. Y., & Cho, M. J. (1999). Collection of children‘s song-1. Gyeonggi: Eumaksekye.

3.

Brodsky, W., Henik, A., Rubinstein, B., & Zorman, M. (2003). Auditory imagery from musical notation in expert musicians. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 602-612.

4.

Coltheart M. (1972). Visual Information processing. In Foss, B. (Ed.), New Horizons in Psychology 2. London: Penguin.

5.

De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.

6.

De Groot, A. D. (1966). Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings. In Kleinmuntz, B. (Ed.), Problem Solving. New York: Wiley.

7.

Deutsch, D. (1980). The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Perception &Psychophysics, 28, 381-389.

8.

Furneaux, S., & Land, M. F. (1999). The effects of skill on the eye-hand span during musical sight-reading. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2435-2440.

9.

Gilman, E., & Underwood, G. (2003). Restricting the field of view to investigate the perceptual spans of pianists. Visual Cognition, 10, 201-232.

10.

Hitch, G. J. (1996). Temporal grouping effects in immediate recall: A working memory analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 116-139.

11.

Krumhansl, C. L. (2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 159-179.

12.

Lehmann A. C., & Kopiez R. (2009). Sight reading. In S. Hallam, I. Cross & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology. (pp. 344-351). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Peretz I., & Kolinsky, R. (1993). Boundaries of Separability between Melody and Rhythm in Music Disrimination: A Neuropsychological Perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 301-325.

14.

Rosemann, S., Altenmüller, E., & Fahle, M. (2015). The art of sight-reading: Influence of practice, playing tempo, complexity and cognitive skills on the eye-hand span in pianists. Psychology of Music, 44, 658-673.

15.

Schmuckler, M. A., & Boltz, M. G. (1994). Harmonic and rhythmic influences on musical expectancy. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 56, 313-325.

16.

Sloboda, J. A. (1976). Visual perception of musical notation: Registering pitch symbols in memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 28, 1-16.

17.

Slobada, J. A. (1981). The uses of space in music notation. Visible Language, 15, 86-112.

18.

Truitt, F. E., Clifton, C., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1997). The perceptual span and the eye-hand span in sight-reading music. Visual Cognition, 4, 143-161.

19.

Waters, A. J., Underwood, J., Findlay, J. M. (1997). Studying expertise in music reading:Use of a pattern-matching paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 477-488.

20.

Wong, Y. K., & Gauthier, I. (2012). Music-reading expertise alters visual spatial resolution for musical notation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 19, 594-600.

21.

Yeseong Editors (2001). The 19th MBC children’s song creation contest. Seoul: Yeseong.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책