바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

한국어 심성어휘집 연구를 위한 어휘판단 데이터베이스

The Korean Lexicon Project: A Lexical Decision Study on 30,930 Korean Words and Nonwords

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2017, v.29 no.4, pp.395-410
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2017.29.4.004
이광오 (영남대학교)
구민모 (고려대학교안암병원)
남기춘 (고려대학교)
박기남 (고려대학교)
박태진 (전남대학교)
배성봉 (영남대학교)
이창환 (서강대학교)
이혜원 (이화여자대학교)
조증열 (경남대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

한국어 심성어휘집의 구조와 검색 과정을 연구하기 위해 한국어 단어 30,930개와 비단어 30,930개에 대한 어휘판단시간을 수집하였다. 참가자는 52명이었고 각 참가자는 61,860개의 자극에 전부 반응하였다. 자극은 단일 단어 방식으로 제시되었으며, 참가자는 화면 중앙에 제시되는 자극이 단어인지 비단어인지 판단하였다. 수집된 데이터베이스의 신뢰성을 검증하기 위해 빈도, 연습, 품사, 길이 등의 영향을 분석하고 가상실험(virtual experiment)을 실시하였다. 두 개의 가상실험 결과는 실제실험 결과와 상당히 일치하였다. 결과를 바탕으로 한국어 심성어휘집 연구에서 메가스터디(megastudy)의 이용에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
메가스터디, 단어재인, 어휘판단, 한글읽기, megastudy, word recognition, lexical decision, Hangul reading

Abstract

Fifty-two Korean students were recruited for the first Korean megastudy to construct a database of lexical decision times on 30,930 Korean words and nonwords. The stimuli were 1-5 syllable in length and included nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs. Participants were asked to decide if a stimulus on the screen was a word or a nonword. Each participant responded to a total of 30,930 words and 30,930 nonwords. The analysis of the lexical decision data obtained showed significant effects of frequency and length. Response times were also affected by POS, supporting the proposal to take into account of POS in the study of the mental lexicon. Practice effect was strong only in early blocks, and some signs of fatigue were apparent at later blocks. Two virtual experiments replicated the results of actual experiments, showing that the database was reliable. Based on the results, the use of megastudy in the understanding of the Korean mental lexicon was proposed.

keywords
메가스터디, 단어재인, 어휘판단, 한글읽기, megastudy, word recognition, lexical decision, Hangul reading

참고문헌

1.

Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. E., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J., Perry, J. R., Lupker, S. J., Forster, K. I., Cortese, M. J., Scaltritti, M., Aschenbrenner, A. J., Coane, J. H., White, L., Yap, M. J., Davis, C., Kim, J., & Davis, C. J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1052-1067.

2.

Aitchison, J. (2003). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Malden, MA:Blackwell.

3.

Amano, S., Kasahara, K., & Kondo, T. (2007). Reliability of familiarity rating of ordinary Japanese words for different years and places. Behavior Research Methods 39, 1008-1011.

4.

Amano, S., & Kondo, T. (1999). Nihongo-no Goi-Tokusei (Lexical properties of Japanese) Vol. 1. Tokyo: Sanseido.

5.

Amano, S., & Kondo, T. (2003). Nihongo-no Goi-Tokusei (Lexical properties of Japanese) Vol. 1-6 (CD-ROM version). Tokyo: Sanseido.

6.

Bae, S., Park, K., Lee, H., & Yi, K. (2016). The mono-syllabic word inferiority effect within Korean word recognition. The Journal of Linguistic Science, 77, 109-125.

7.

Bae, S., & Yi, K., & Park, H. (2012). Semantic transparency effects in the recognition and learning of Sino-Korean words. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 607-620.

8.

Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316.

9.

Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459. http://elexicon.wustl.edu/

10.

Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 545-559.

11.

Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York:Academic Press.

12.

Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M, Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project:Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488-496.

13.

Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.

14.

Huey, E. (1908/1968). The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading (Reprint). MIT Press 1968 (originally published 1908).

15.

Juphard, A., Carbonnel, S., Ans, B., & Valdois, S. (2006). Length effect in naming and lexical decision: the multitrace memory model’s account. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition, 19(2).

16.

Kang, B., & Kim, H. (2009). Frequency of Korean Usage. Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.

17.

Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: a lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1-15.

18.

Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle K., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287-304.

19.

Lee, H., Choi, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, S. (2011). The age of acquisition effects in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 23, 465-485.

20.

Liu, Y., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2007). Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 92-98.

21.

Miller, G. A. (1991). The Science of Words. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.

22.

Nam, K., Seo, K., Choi, K., Lee, K., Kim, T., & Lee, M. (1997). Word length effect on Hangul word recognition. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-18.

23.

New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 45-52.

24.

Park, K. (1993). Mental code involved in Hangul word recognition. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5, 40-55.

25.

Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Clifton, C., & Ashby, J. (2012). The Psychology of Reading, 2nd Edition. New York: Psychology Press.

26.

Seidenberg, M. S., & Waters, G. S. (1989). Word recognition and naming: A mega study. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 27, 489.

27.

Sze, W. P., Rickard Liow, S. J. R., & Yap, M. J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 263-273.

28.

Tse, C.-S., Yap, M. J., Chan, Y.-L., Sze, W. P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D. (2017). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1503-1519.

29.

Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 407-426.

30.

Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Tan, L. C. (2016). Individual differences in semantic priming performance: Insights from the Semantic Priming Project. In M. N. Jones (Ed.), Big data in cognitive science: From methods to insights. New York: Psychology Press.

31.

Yap, M. J., Rickard Liow, S. J., Jalil, S. B., & Faizal, S. S. B. (2010). The Malay lexicon project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 992-1003.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물