Research on Comparing Time Perception for Looming/Receding Stimuli

자극의 크기가 서서히 커져서 관찰자를 향해 다가오는 것으로 지각되는 확장자극과 자극의 크기가 서서히 작아져서 관찰자로부터 멀어지는 것으로 지각되는 축소자극이 시간지각에 미치는 영향을 비교해본 기존 연구들은 상반된 결과를 보이고 있다. 본 연구에서는, 자극의 크기, 속도, 제시시간을 동시에 통제하기 어렵다는 점을 고려하여 동적자극 대신에 정적자극의 제시시간을 조작하였고, 반응 단계에 오염변인이 개입될 가능성을 최소화하기 위하여 시간비교과제를 사용하였다. 또한, 자극의 크기가 영향을 미칠 가능성을 살펴보기 위하여 정적자극의 크기를 조작한 추가 실험을 진행하였다. 실험 결과, 축소자극에 비해 확장자극에서 지각된 시간이 증가하는 결과를 보여, 자극의 깊이상에서의 움직임 방향이 시간지각에 영향을 미친다는 점을 확인하였다.

keywords: time perception, dynamic, static, looming, receding, approaching, 시간지각, 정적자극, 동적자극, 확장자극, 축소자극, 접근, 후퇴

Abstract

Previous studies comparing the effects of looming stimuli and receding stimuli on time perception show conflicting results. In this study, the presentation time of static stimuli was manipulated instead of dynamic stimuli, considering that it is difficult to control size, speed, and presentation time of stimuli simultaneously. Temporal comparison tasks were employed to minimize the possible involvement of confounding variables in the response stage. In addition, the size of the static stimuli was manipulated in order to examine the possibility that the size of the stimuli might influence. Experimental results show that the perceived time increases in the looming stimuli compared to the receding stimuli, and that the direction of the stimuli affects the time perception.

keywords: time perception, dynamic, static, looming, receding, approaching, 시간지각, 정적자극, 동적자극, 확장자극, 축소자극, 접근, 후퇴

참고문헌

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.

Ball, W., and Tronick, E. (1971). Infant responses to impending collision: Optical and Real. Science 171, 818-820.

Bi, C., Liu, P., Yuan, X., & Huang, X. (2014). Working memory modulates the association between time and number representation. Perception, 43(5), 417-426.

Brainard, D. H. (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision 10, 443-446.

Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception &Psychophysics, 57, 105-116.

Cai, M. B., & Eagleman, D. M. (2014). Duration estimates within a modality are integrated sub-optimally. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1041.

Charras, P., Droit-Volet, S., Brechet, C., & Coull, J. T. (2017). The spatial representation of time can be flexibly oriented in the frontal or lateral planes from an early age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(4), 832-845.

Cui, Q., Zhao, K., Chen, Y. H., Zheng, W., & Fu, X. (2018). Opposing subjective temporal experiences in response to unpredictable and predictable fear-relevant stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 360.

Gorea, A., & Kim, J. (2015). Time dilates more with apparent than with physical speed. Journal of Vision, 15(1):7, 1-11.

10.

Grassi, M., & Pavan, A. (2012). The subjective duration of audiovisual looming and receding stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1321-1333.

11.

Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 561-582.

12.

Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L., Hogendoorn, H., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Time dilation in dynamic visual display. Journal of Vision, 6(12), 1421-1430.

13.

Kaneko, S., & Murakami, I. (2009). Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. Journal of Vision, 9(7):14, 1-12.

14.

Mo, S. S., & Michalski, V. A. (1972). Judgment of temporal duration of area as a function of stimulus configuration. Psychonomic Science, 27(2), 97-98.

15.

Nather, F. C., & Bueno, J. L. O. (2011). Static images with different induced intensities of human body movements affect subjective time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(1), 157-170.

16.

Ogden, R. S., Wearden, J. H., & Montgomery, C. (2014). The differential contribution of executive functions to temporal generalisation, reproduction and verbal estimation. Acta Psychologica, 152, 84-94.

17.

Pan, Y., & Luo, Q. Y. (2012). Working memory modulates the perception of time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 46-51.

18.

Pelli, D. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10(4), 437-442.

19.

Rattat, A. C., & Picard, D. (2012). Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: Evidence for selective interference effects. Psychological Research, 76(1), 32-40.

20.

Rossini, J. C. (2014). Looming motion and visual attention. Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(3), 425-431.

21.

Schiff, W., Caviness, J. A., & Gibson, J. J. (1962). Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of “looming”. Science, 136(3520), 982-983.

22.

Simchy-Gross, R., & Margulis, E. H. (2018). Expectation, information processing, and subjective duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(1), 275-291.

23.

Thomas, E. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1976). Simultaneous time and size perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 19(4), 353-360.

24.

Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 66(7), 1171-1189.

25.

Wearden, J. H. (2004). Decision processes in models of timing. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 64(3), 303-318.

26.

Wiener, M., Turkeltaub, P., & Coslett, H. B. (2010). The image of time: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1728-1740.

27.

Wittmann, M., Van Wassenhove, V., Craig, B., & Paulus, M. P. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 2.

28.

Xuan, B., Zhang, D., He, S., & Chen, X. (2007). Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 1-5.

29.

Yamamoto, K., & Miura, K. (2012). Time dilation caused by static images with implied motion. Experimental Brain Research, 223(2), 311-319.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.31 No.3

확장/축소자극에 따른 시간지각 비교 연구

Research on Comparing Time Perception for Looming/Receding Stimuli

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물