바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.3
Citation Share

Research on Comparing Time Perception for Looming/Receding Stimuli

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2019, v.31 no.3, pp.245-252
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2019.31.3.005



& (2019). Research on Comparing Time Perception for Looming/Receding Stimuli. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 31(3), 245-252, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2019.31.3.005
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Previous studies comparing the effects of looming stimuli and receding stimuli on time perception show conflicting results. In this study, the presentation time of static stimuli was manipulated instead of dynamic stimuli, considering that it is difficult to control size, speed, and presentation time of stimuli simultaneously. Temporal comparison tasks were employed to minimize the possible involvement of confounding variables in the response stage. In addition, the size of the static stimuli was manipulated in order to examine the possibility that the size of the stimuli might influence. Experimental results show that the perceived time increases in the looming stimuli compared to the receding stimuli, and that the direction of the stimuli affects the time perception.

keywords
time perception, dynamic, static, looming, receding, approaching, 시간지각, 정적자극, 동적자극, 확장자극, 축소자극, 접근, 후퇴

Reference

1.

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.

2.

Ball, W., and Tronick, E. (1971). Infant responses to impending collision: Optical and Real. Science 171, 818-820.

3.

Bi, C., Liu, P., Yuan, X., & Huang, X. (2014). Working memory modulates the association between time and number representation. Perception, 43(5), 417-426.

4.

Brainard, D. H. (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision 10, 443-446.

5.

Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception &Psychophysics, 57, 105-116.

6.

Cai, M. B., & Eagleman, D. M. (2014). Duration estimates within a modality are integrated sub-optimally. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1041.

7.

Charras, P., Droit-Volet, S., Brechet, C., & Coull, J. T. (2017). The spatial representation of time can be flexibly oriented in the frontal or lateral planes from an early age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(4), 832-845.

8.

Cui, Q., Zhao, K., Chen, Y. H., Zheng, W., & Fu, X. (2018). Opposing subjective temporal experiences in response to unpredictable and predictable fear-relevant stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 360.

9.

Gorea, A., & Kim, J. (2015). Time dilates more with apparent than with physical speed. Journal of Vision, 15(1):7, 1-11.

10.

Grassi, M., & Pavan, A. (2012). The subjective duration of audiovisual looming and receding stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1321-1333.

11.

Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 561-582.

12.

Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L., Hogendoorn, H., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Time dilation in dynamic visual display. Journal of Vision, 6(12), 1421-1430.

13.

Kaneko, S., & Murakami, I. (2009). Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. Journal of Vision, 9(7):14, 1-12.

14.

Mo, S. S., & Michalski, V. A. (1972). Judgment of temporal duration of area as a function of stimulus configuration. Psychonomic Science, 27(2), 97-98.

15.

Nather, F. C., & Bueno, J. L. O. (2011). Static images with different induced intensities of human body movements affect subjective time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113(1), 157-170.

16.

Ogden, R. S., Wearden, J. H., & Montgomery, C. (2014). The differential contribution of executive functions to temporal generalisation, reproduction and verbal estimation. Acta Psychologica, 152, 84-94.

17.

Pan, Y., & Luo, Q. Y. (2012). Working memory modulates the perception of time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 46-51.

18.

Pelli, D. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10(4), 437-442.

19.

Rattat, A. C., & Picard, D. (2012). Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: Evidence for selective interference effects. Psychological Research, 76(1), 32-40.

20.

Rossini, J. C. (2014). Looming motion and visual attention. Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(3), 425-431.

21.

Schiff, W., Caviness, J. A., & Gibson, J. J. (1962). Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of “looming”. Science, 136(3520), 982-983.

22.

Simchy-Gross, R., & Margulis, E. H. (2018). Expectation, information processing, and subjective duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(1), 275-291.

23.

Thomas, E. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1976). Simultaneous time and size perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 19(4), 353-360.

24.

Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 66(7), 1171-1189.

25.

Wearden, J. H. (2004). Decision processes in models of timing. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 64(3), 303-318.

26.

Wiener, M., Turkeltaub, P., & Coslett, H. B. (2010). The image of time: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1728-1740.

27.

Wittmann, M., Van Wassenhove, V., Craig, B., & Paulus, M. P. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 2.

28.

Xuan, B., Zhang, D., He, S., & Chen, X. (2007). Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. Journal of Vision, 7(10), 1-5.

29.

Yamamoto, K., & Miura, K. (2012). Time dilation caused by static images with implied motion. Experimental Brain Research, 223(2), 311-319.

The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy