바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Subjective Indicators of Deception Detection in High/Low Stake Situations: Comparison among University Students and Prison Officers and Prisoners

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2005, v.11 no.4, pp.1-22


Abstract

Purposes of this study was as following; What differences do subjective indicators of deception detection according to high and low stake situations? Does groups difference appear in beliefs about deception cues? Is what differences between objective indicators and subjective indicators of deceptions? Participants of this study were consisted of university students, prison officers, prisoners. They completed a questionnaire concerning beliefs about 21 verbal and nonverbal behaviours in high/low-stake situations. For each behaviour, they were asked to rate on a seven-point scale how are these behaviours changed comparing to normal times. The results were that subjective indicators of deception were no differences between high-stake and low-stake situations, and no differences among groups. Also, it appeared that the subjective indicators of deception were substantly different from the objective indicators of deception.

keywords
거짓말 탐지 단서, 주관적 지표, 객관적 지표, deception detection cues, subjective indicators, objective indicators

Reference

1.

(2005) 용의자의 거짓말 탐지를 위한 비언어적 단서탐색,

2.

(2005) 수사현장에서 용의자의 비언어적 행동단서를 이용한 거짓말 탐지 연구,

3.

(2005185-198) 거짓말의 특징에 대한 신념-경찰관과 대학생을 중심으로,

4.

(1996) Lay persona' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. ,

5.

(1986) On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception,

6.

(2003) The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception Beliefs about the cues to deception in high- and low-stake situations,

7.

(1988) The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception Journal of Noverbal Behaviour,

8.

(1983) Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

9.

(2003) Cues to deception,

10.

(19822004) Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making Criminals' beliefs about deception,

11.

(1988) Lying and non-verbal behaviour:Theoretical issues and new findings,

12.

(1993199-223) Training lie detectors to use non-verbal cues instead og global heuristics,

13.

(1997) The ability to detect deceit generalises across different types of high-stake lies,

14.

(19682003) Experiments in Spontaneous Speech Beliefs about the cues to deception in high- and low-stake situations,

15.

(1987) Expectations of honest Journal of Social Psychology,

16.

(2004) Criminals' beliefs about deception,

17.

(19892003) Behavioural correlates of statement credibility Beliefs about the cues to deception in high- and low-stake situations,

18.

(1980) Humans as lie detectors:some second thought,

19.

(2003) Beliefs about the cues to deception in high- and low-stake situations,

20.

(2000) An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception,

21.

(2003) How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officess,

22.

(2000) The effects of varying stake and cognitive complexity on beliefs about the cues to deception,

23.

(1995) Behavioural correlates of deception in simulated police interview,

24.

(2000) Detecting lies and deceit:The psychology of lying and its implication for professional practice, John Wiley and Sons

25.

(1996) Lie experts' beliefs about non-verbal indicators of deception,

26.

(1996) Insight into behaviour dispalyed during deception,

27.

(2003) Police officer's and students' beliefs about telling and detecting trivial and serious lies International Journal of Police Science & Management,

28.

(1981) Beliefs about cues associated with deception Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour,

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues