초록

본 연구는 스트레스-취약성 모델을 토대로 노인 자살의 독특한 원인과 특성을 살펴보고, 자살의 유형화를 시도하고자 수행되었다. 분석결과, 자살의 취약성 요인으로 개인적 요인과 가족환경적 요인이 밝혀졌다. 개인의 특성과 관련된 요인인 개인적 요인은 개인의 정신건강문제, 신체건강문제, 문제행동으로 분류되었다. 가족환경적 요인은 취약성 요인 중, 가정환경과 관련된 요인들로 가족관계문제와 경제적 문제로 나뉘어졌다. 자살의 촉발사건은 촉발사건의 성격에 따라 분류하였는데, 대인관계적 사건만이 나타났다. 대인관계적 사건은 자살자가 자신에게 중요하게 여기는 사람과의 관계단절 등을 경험하는 대인관계상실 사건과 대인관계상 갈등으로 인해 자살을 하게 된 대인관계갈등 사건으로 분류되었다. 취약성 요인과 촉발사건의 상호 영향력에 따라 자살을 유형화하였으며 자살의 촉발사건은 언급되지 않고 취약성 요인만 언급된 취약형 자살, 촉발사건만이 언급된 사건반응형 자살, 그리고 취약성 요인과 촉발사건이 동시에 언급된 복합형 자살로 분류하였다. 자살유형에 따른 특성과 각각의 자살 예방법에 대해 논의하였으며, 청소년과 성인을 대상으로 한 선행 연구들과의 비교를 통해 노인 자살의 특성을 보다 명백히 살펴보았다.

Abstract

There are less studies on the elderly suicide even though it's steep increase. The purpose of the present study was to investigate factors that influence on the elderly suicide and to categorize them. For these purpose, A total of 23 cases were analyzed through qualitative contents analysis. Specifically, on the basis of the stress-vulnerability model, we scrutinized vulnerability factors(classified personal, family-environment factors) and precipitating events (classified interpersonal events) influencing on the elderly suicide. Personal factor was to be classified into personal mental health, physical health and problematic behavior. Family-environment factor was divided family relationship problem and economic problem. Interpersonal events belonging to the precipitating events was to be classified into interpersonal loss and interpersonal conflict. As the results of this study, elderly suicide classified into 3 types, that is, ‘risk type suicide’, ‘event-response type suicide’, ‘complex type’. And then we discussed the characteristics of the suicidal types and suggestions for reduction of elderly suicide.

초록

본 연구는 남녀 대학생을 대상으로 강자, 약자와의 관계에서 암묵적으로 경험하는 동일시, 고양과 비하, 진실과 거짓을 알아보기 위해, 3가지 IAT검사와 3가지 명시적인 검사(동일시 검사, RWA, RISC)를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 대학생들은 명시적, 암묵적으로 강자를 동일시하였으며, 강자와의 관계에 고양되며, 강자와의 관계에 진실을 연합하였다. 한편 남성보다는 여성들이 강자와의 관계에 고양과 진실을 암묵적으로 연합하는 반응이 빨랐고, RWA 고집단 남성과 RWA 저집단 여성은 강자 동일시 반응이 빨랐으며, RWA 저집단과 RISC 고집단은 강자와의 관계에 진실, 약자와의 관계에 거짓을 연합하는 반응이 빠르게 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 권위주의의 구조, Tesser의 SEM 이론, 그리고 약자보호 관점의 인간관계 특성과 관련하여 논의되었다.

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore college students' implicit identification with others powerful or powerless, and implicit association of self-enhancement & authenticity with their relationships with others powerful or powerless. The study was based on measuring 3 sorts of IAT: an explicit identification test, RWA, & RISC. The results were summed up as follows: Students identified their selves with others more powerful than others powerless; expressed self-enhancement when they were with powerful others; and associated ‘true’ with relationship with others powerful. Men with high RWA & women with low RWA identified their selves more with others powerful; low RWA & high RISC groups' associated relationship with others powerful to ‘true’ and others powerless to ‘false’ more rapidly. These results were discussed in terms of structure of authoritarianism, SEM, relationship with others powerful and powerless.

초록

본 연구는 남녀 대학생을 대상으로 강자, 약자와의 관계에서 암묵적으로 경험하는 동일시, 고양과 비하, 진실과 거짓을 알아보기 위해, 3가지 IAT검사와 3가지 명시적인 검사(동일시 검사, RWA, RISC)를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 대학생들은 명시적, 암묵적으로 강자를 동일시하였으며, 강자와의 관계에 고양되며, 강자와의 관계에 진실을 연합하였다. 한편 남성보다는 여성들이 강자와의 관계에 고양과 진실을 암묵적으로 연합하는 반응이 빨랐고, RWA 고집단 남성과 RWA 저집단 여성은 강자 동일시 반응이 빨랐으며, RWA 저집단과 RISC 고집단은 강자와의 관계에 진실, 약자와의 관계에 거짓을 연합하는 반응이 빠르게 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 권위주의의 구조, Tesser의 SEM 이론, 그리고 약자보호 관점의 인간관계 특성과 관련하여 논의되었다.

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore college students' implicit identification with others powerful or powerless, and implicit association of self-enhancement & authenticity with their relationships with others powerful or powerless. The study was based on measuring 3 sorts of IAT: an explicit identification test, RWA, & RISC. The results were summed up as follows: Students identified their selves with others more powerful than others powerless; expressed self-enhancement when they were with powerful others; and associated 'true' with relationship with others powerful. Men with high RWA & women with low RWA identified their selves more with others powerful; low RWA & high RISC groups' associated relationship with others powerful to 'true' and others powerless to 'false' more rapidly. These results were discussed in terms of structure of authoritarianism, SEM, relationship with others powerful and powerless.

초록

Abstract

This article compares the psychological and behavioral profiles of adolescents on probation and high school students. A total of 253 adolescents on probation and 257 high school students completed an open-ended questionnaire developed by the present researchers and structured questionnaire that assessed moral disengagement and self-efficacy developed by Bandura (1995), delinquent behavior and academic achievement. Adolescents on probation reported that they engaged in delinquent behavior due to the fault of others and they were angry for being forced to be on probation. They are not likely to take responsibility and morally disengage from their delinquent actions. When compared to high school students, adolescents on probation are likely to report low self-efficacy, low academic grade, and less likely to feel proud of themselves. They are more likely to meet their friends in Internet and video game rooms and less likely to focus on academic achievement. Results of ANCOVA indicate that adolescents on probation have higher scores on moral disengagement, social efficacy, but lower score on efficacy for self-regulated learning. They are more likely to run away from home and have lower academic grade. The results of the discriminant analysis indicate that running away from home, social efficacy and moral disengagement are predictive of adolescents on probation and academic achievement and efficacy for self-regulated learning are predictive of high school students.

초록

Abstract

This study investigates happy life experiences and their emotional responses to these experiences with a sample of Korean students and adults. A total of 489 Korean university students and adults completed an open-ended questionnaire developed by the present researchers. Three sets of results have been found. First, while experiences of achievement and failure affect the strength of feelings of happiness or unhappiness, social relationships with family members and friends affect the frequency of feelings of happiness or unhappiness. Second, while strong positive affects are aroused by sense of achievement and pride, frequent positive affects are aroused by feeling of calmness and positive relational emotions (such as jung - deep affection and attachment). Third, while strong negative affects are aroused by sense of frustration and sadness, frequent negative affects are aroused by anxiety and negative relational emotions (such as the sense of indebtedness and shame). These results indicate that the interpersonal relationships with family members and friends and personal achievements and failures influence the subjective well-being of feeling happy or unhappy with people's lives.

초록

본 연구는 실제 사건의 용의자를 대상으로 거짓말 탐지의 비언어적 단서와 Othello의 오류(상대방이 자신의 결백을 믿지 않는 것에 대한 ‘불신의 두려움’을 거짓말 하는 사람이 나타내는 ‘발각의 두려움’이라고 잘못 판단하는 오류) 단서를 찾고, 기존의 연구결과와 어떤 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 대상자는 영내 무단 음주사건의 혐의자 18명이었다. 이 중 8명은 실제 음주행위를 했던 용의자들이었고(거짓집단), 나머지 10명은 무혐의자들이었다(진실집단). 거짓집단이 사건 무관련 질문(거짓을 말할 필요가 없음으로 진실반응을 나타냄)과 사건 관련 질문(사건과 관련되기 때문에 거짓반응을 나타냄)에서 나타낸 행동특징들 중 유의미한 차이를 나타낸 행동을 거짓말 탐지의 단서로 삼았다. 또한 진실집단이 사건 무관련 질문(진실반응)과 사건 관련 질문(진실반응)에서 나타낸 행동특징들 중 유의미한 차이를 나타낸 행동을 Othello의 오류 단서로 삼았다. 그 결과, 거짓집단에게서 발견된 거짓말 탐지단서는 잠시멈춤 시간, 잠시멈춤 빈도, 미세표정, 머리움직임이었다. 즉 거짓을 말할 때 잠시멈춤 시간과 빈도가 감소하였고, 미세표정과 머리움직임은 증가하였다. 그러나 진실집단이 사건 관련 질문에서 더 짧은 답변지연시간을 나타낸 것은 Othello의 오류와 관련된 것이 아니었다. 그리고 본 연구와 기존의 국내 연구결과를 비교하였을 때 잠시멈춤 빈도가 일치된 단서로 나타났다. 즉, 진실을 말할 때보다 거짓을 말할 때 잠시멈춤빈도가 감소되는 것으로, 이는 상대방에게 신뢰로운 인상을 주고자 행동통제를 시도한 것으로 해석될 수 있다.

Abstract

This study was examined the effective nonverbal behavior cues of detecting suspects‘ lies in the investigation scene. In order to search the suspects who drank the alcohol liquor without a permission, 18 soldiers were interviewed. 8 solders had drunken alcohol and had lied when was asked(lie group). The other 10 soldiers hadn't drunken alcohol and had told the truth(truth group). The mean frequencies of nonverbal behaviors were compared lie group with truth group. The following behaviors were measured by frequency: vocal characteristics (high pitch of voice, speech hesitations, speech error, frequency of pauses, period of pauses, latency period), facial characteristics (gaze, smile, touching face, blinking, facial micro-expression), body movement (illustrators, hand and finger movement, leg and foot movement, head movement, trunk movement, shifting position). As results, this study found that deception cues were periods and frequencies of pause, micro-expression, head movements. The lie group had less periods and frequencies of pause, and more micro-expression, head movements than truth group. But, this study didn't found Othello's error cues.