바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Factors influencing quality of life for individuals and Korean society: Indigenous psychological analysis across different generations

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2006, v.12 no.1, pp.161-195


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine factors influencing quality of life for individuals in the family, school or workplace, leisure settings, and Korean society using the indigenous psychological analysis. A total of 3,406 participants, consisting of 1,331 elementary, middle, high school students and 2,075 parents and teacher, completed an open-ended questionnaire developed by Kim and Park (2004b). The respondents reported the factors that influence quality of life in Korean society as follows: Economic condition, collective effort, leisure and cultural life, harmonious interpersonal relationships, effective government policy, and educational attainment. The factors that reduce quality of life in Korean society are as follows: Economic uncertainty, political instability, lack of citizenry, ingroup favoritism, corruption, lack of facilities for leisure and social life, and overemphasis on educational achievement. Second, the factors that influence quality of life in the family are as follows: Harmonious family relations and financial security. For students relationship with friends and academic achievement are reported as important factors influencing quality of life at school. For adults, harmonious interpersonal relationship, financial factors and occupational achievement are reported as important factors influencing quality of life at the workplace. For leisure and social leisure life, financial security, leisure time and interpersonal relationships are reported as important factors influencing quality of life. Third, as for generational differences, students reported political instability and adults reported economic uncertainty as the most important factor reducing quality of life in Korean society. For family life, students reported conflicts among family members and adults reported financial constraints as the most important factor reducing quality of life. For leisure and social life, students reported lack of leisure time and adults reported financial constraints as the most important factor reducing quality of life. Fourth, for students the following characteristics were associated with higher quality of life: Higher socio-economic status of the family, younger, and higher academic achievement. For adults, the following characteristics were associated with higher quality of life: Higher socio-economic status of the family and greater achievement their social life. Implications of these results on the quality of life in Korea, focusing on human relationship, financial factors, self-regulation and educational achievement are discussed.

keywords
삶의 질, 토착심리, 세대차이, 인간관계, 자기조절, 교육적 성취, 경제적 요인, ality of life, indigenous psychology. generational differences, interpersonal relationship, self-regulation, academic achievement, financial status

Reference

1.

(2000) 청소년과 성인간의 세대차이와 유사성,

2.

(1999) IMF시대가 한국인의 스트레스에 미친 영향: 토착심리학적 접근.,

3.

(2001) IMF시대 한국 학생과 성인의 스트레스와 대처양식 및 생활만족도에 대한 연구: 사회적 지원과 자기효능감과의 관계를 중심으로,

4.

(2004a) 청소년과 부모의 인간관계를 통해 본 신뢰의식: 토착심리학적 접근,

5.

(2004b) 청소년과 성인의 삶의 질 인식에 대한 토착심리 분석: 가정, 학교, 직장, 여가생활을 중심으로,

6.

(2005) 건강과 삶의 질에 영향을 주는 요인에 대한 분석: 자기효능감, 사회적 지원 및 질병관리를 중심으로,

7.

(2002) 한국 사회의 교육적 성취: 현상과 심리적 기반, 한국교육심리학회

8.

(2003) 제 4 장. 한국 교육학의 토착화에 대한 회고와 전망: ‘교육심리학’을 중심으로, 원미사

9.

(2004a) 한국인의 부모자녀관계 자기개념과 가족역할 인식의 토착심리 탐구, 교육과학사

10.

(2004b) 한국의 청소년 문화와 부모자녀관계:토착심리 탐구, 교육과학사

11.

(2002) IMF시대 이후 초, 중, 고, 대학생과 부모의 스트레스 경험과 대처양식 및 사회적 지원: 토착심리학적 분석,

12.

(2002) 부모의 사회적 지원, 청소년의 자기효능감과 생활만족도: 변화에 대한 종단자료 분석과 생활만족도 형성에 대한 구조적 관계 분석, 한국교육심리학회

13.

(2004) 한국 청소년의 부모자녀관계와 성취에 대한 종단연구: 자기효능감과 성취동기를 중심으로,

14.

(2002) IMF시대 이후 한국 학생과 성인의 성공에 대한 의식: 토착심리학적 분석.,

15.

(2005) 청소년과 부모의 실패와 미래성취 의식을 통해 본 한국인의 성취관련 토착심리,

16.

(2005) 한국인의 건강과 삶의 질,

17.

(2005) 왜 한국인의 행복감은 낮은가?,

18.

(2005) 고령운전자의 교통사고와 삶의 질,

19.

(2006) 초등학생의 삶의 질에 대한 분석: 사회적 지원, 자기효능감, 학업성취와의 관계를 중심으로, 한국아동교육학회

20.

(2006.01.20) 사이(間) 문화가 낳은 싸이 문화,

21.

(2002) 여가활동, 여가동기, 자기효능감 및 주관적 안녕감간의 관계,

22.

(2005) 한국 문화에서 주관안녕에 관련되는 사회심리 요인들,

23.

(2005) 한국 노인의 우울 증상과 행복,

24.

(1997) Self-efficacy:The exercise of control, Freeman

25.

(2000185-218) Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations, The MIT Press

26.

(2000) The MIT Press, The MIT Press

27.

(1991) Culture and organizations:Software of the mind, Mcgraw Hills

28.

(1997) Modernization and post- modernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 countries, Princeton university press

29.

(1995) Individualism and collectivism: A psychological, cultural and ecological analysis,

30.

(1999) After the "crisis" in social psychology: The development of the transactional model of science,

31.

(2000) Confucianism and family values: Their impact of educational achievement in Korea. Freie Universitat Berlin, Institut fur Allgemeine Padagogik,

32.

(2003) Chapter 9. An indigenous analysis of success attribution: Comparison of Korean students and adults, Greenwood Publisher

33.

(2004) Indigenous psychologies. Spielberger, C. (Ed.)., Elsevier Academic Press

34.

(2006) Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context, Springer

35.

(2005) Positive ageing: What is it and why do some people age well?,

36.

(2002) Parent-child relationship and subjective well-being: Redefining human agency and meaning systems,

37.

(2006.1.14) 그것이 알고 싶다: 벼락부자, 그 후-부자라서 행복하십니까?,

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues