바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Implicit Representations of Relationship with the Powerful and the Powerless Other in Korean College Students

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2006, v.12 no.2, pp.21-43




Abstract

This study was conducted to explore college students' implicit identification with others powerful or powerless, and implicit association of self-enhancement & authenticity with their relationships with others powerful or powerless. The study was based on measuring 3 sorts of IAT: an explicit identification test, RWA, & RISC. The results were summed up as follows: Students identified their selves with others more powerful than others powerless; expressed self-enhancement when they were with powerful others; and associated ‘true’ with relationship with others powerful. Men with high RWA & women with low RWA identified their selves more with others powerful; low RWA & high RISC groups' associated relationship with others powerful to ‘true’ and others powerless to ‘false’ more rapidly. These results were discussed in terms of structure of authoritarianism, SEM, relationship with others powerful and powerless.

keywords
powerful other, powerless other, Implicit Association Test, Right Wing Authoritarianism Scale, Relational Interdependent Self-Construal, 강자, 약자, 암묵적 연합검사, 권위주의, 관계적 자아

Reference

1.

(2005) 한국 남녀 대학생의 ‘개인’과 ‘관계’의 암묵적 표상,

2.

(2003) 여성의 명시적 암묵적 자아해석에 미치는 성 고정관념의 영향,

3.

(2000) 한국인 심리학, 중앙대학교 출판부

4.

(1988) Enemies of freedom:Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Jossey-Bass

5.

(1996) The authoritarian specter, Harvard U. Press.

6.

(2002) The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies,

7.

(1996) The impact of the interdependent self-construal on downward comparison, Iowa State Univ

8.

(1998) The self, McGraw Hill

9.

(1998) Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy,

10.

(1989) Social stigma and self-esteem:The self protective properties of stigma,

11.

(1997) Models of the self:Self-construals and gender,

12.

(2000) The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships,

13.

(1997) Authoritarianism and gender roles: Toward a Psychological analysis of hegemonic relationships,

14.

(1941) Escape from freedom 자유로부터의 도피, 홍신문화사

15.

(2002) When you and I are "we" you are not threatening: The role of self-expansion in social comparison,

16.

(2003) Understanding and using the implicit Association Test: I. An improved Scoring System,

17.

(2000) Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept,

18.

(2002) A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept,

19.

(2005) Self-power associations: The possession of power impacts women's self-concepts,

20.

(1998) The personal self in social context: Barriers to authenticity., Oxford

21.

(1999) Culture, self-discrepancies, and self-satisfaction,

22.

(2003) Power, approach, and inhibition,

23.

(2001) Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes,

24.

(2001) The authoritarian personality, 50 years later: What lessons are there for political psychology?,

25.

(2003) Comparison processes in social judgment:Mechanisms and consequences,

26.

(2002) Math=male, me=female, therefore math ≠me.,

27.

(1993) The bases of power Journal of Social Issues,

28.

(2003) Hitler and Churchill:Secrets of leadership, Weidengeld & Nicolson

29.

(2001) self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and in-group share desirable traits,

30.

(2002) Favoritism, bias, and error in performance ratings of scientists and engineers: The effects of power, status, and numbers,

31.

(1988181-227) Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press

32.

(2005) Explaining the nature of power:A three-process theory,

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues