Differences in Obedience to Authority between Authoritarians and Non-Authoritarians: in Three Authority-level Situations

윤상연; 한성열

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

P-ISSN1229-0661
E-ISSN1229-0661
KCI

Home

OA Policy

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.14 No.3

Citation Share

Differences in Obedience to Authority between Authoritarians and Non-Authoritarians: in Three Authority-level Situations

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661

2008, v.14 no.3, pp.41-56

& (2008). Differences in Obedience to Authority between Authoritarians and Non-Authoritarians: in Three Authority-level Situations. Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 14(3), 41-56.

copy

Abstract

Existing studies show that authoritarians are obedient to the powerful even though they are coercive to the weak. However, the personal relationships are very diverse even in the range of the authority relations. The purpose of this study is to explain the differences in the obedience to authority between authoritarians and non-authoritarians in some situations which have different authority-levels. This study presumed that obedience to authority is affected by their own authoritarianism. For this study, four scenarios were used to provide subjects with the situations that are different in the strength of authority. And the results demonstrated that people behave differently according to the level of authority. The result showed that in the low-authority situation authoritarians tend to obey less to the authorities than non-authoritarians. This result is different from existing ones. It follows from what has been said that the loss of authority in Korea partially comes from the double standard of the authoritarians according to the strength of authority.

keywords: 권위관계, 내외집단, 실익유무, 권위주의 성격, 복종, authority relations, authority level, authoritarian personality, obedience to authority

Reference

한성열 ; 김재신, (2004) 권위주의 성격에 따른 공정과 인정의 갈등상황에서의 판단: 이중잣대를 가진 사람은 누구인가, 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

민경환, (1989) 권위주의 성격과 사회적 편견:대학생 집단을 중심으로, 한국심리학회지:사회

손철성, (2005) 탈전통적 한국 사회에서 권위의 문제-권위의 결핍인가, 새로운 형태의 권위인가, 철학연구

송경재, (2004) 권위주의 성격과 공감능력이 북한이탈주민에 대한 심리적 거리감과 감정평가에 미치는 영향 연구, 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집

이수인, (2005) 권위주의의 특성과 재생산과정의 성 차이-대학생을 중심으로, 한국사회학

조혜자, (2006) 대학생의 강자-약자와의 관계에 대한 암묵적 표상, 한국심리학회지. 사회문제

최상진, (1997) 한국인 심리학, 중앙대학교출판부

최상진, (1999) 한국인의 self의 특성: 서구의 self 개념과 대비를 중심으로, 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

최상진, (2000) 권위에 관한 한국인의 의식체계: 권위, 권위주의와 체면의 구조에 대한 토착심리학적 접근, 한국심리학회지: 사회문제

10.

최재석, (1994) 한국인의 사회적 성격, 현음사

11.

한국교육과정평가원, 국내외 교실 학습연구(Ⅰ) - 한국, 영국, 프랑스, 일본의 초등학교를 중심으로,

12.

한규석, (2002) 사회심리학의 이해, 학지사

13.

Adorno. T., (1950) The authoritarian personality, Harper

14.

Altemeyer,B., (1996) The authoritarian specter, Harvard Univ. Press

15.

Bkstr, M., (2007) Structural modeling of generalized prejudice; The role of social dominance, authoritarianism and empathy, Journal of Individual Differences

16.

Brass,D.J., (1993) Potential power and power use: An Investigation of structure and behavior, Academy of Management Journal

17.

Buckley,W., (1967) Sociology and modern systems theory, Prentice Hall

18.

Cartwright,D., (1959) A field theoretical conception of power. In : Studies in social power, Institute for Social Research

19.

Dru,V., (2007) Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: Effects of various self-categorization conditions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

20.

Fable,C.M., (1992) Consequence for managers of using single influence tactics and combination of tactics, Academy of Management Journal

21.

Forsyth, D. R., (2004) Group Dynamics, 시그마프레스

22.

French, J. R. P., Jr, (1959) The bases of social power. In : Studies in social power , Institute for Social Research

23.

Hofstede,G., (1980) Culture's Consequences: International differences in work-related values, Sage

24.

Kelman,H.C., (1989) Crimes of Obedience, Yale University Press

25.

Lewin,K., (1951) Field theory in social science, Harper

26.

Maslow,A,H., (1943) The authoritarian characters structure, Journal of Social Psychology

27.

Milgram,S., (1963) Behavioral study of obedience, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

28.

Milgram,S., (1974) Obedience to Authority, Haper & Row

29.

Passini,S., (2008) Exploring the multidimensional facets of authoritarianism: Authoritarian aggression and social dominance orientation, Swiss Journal of Psychology

30.

Rahim,M.A., (1989) Relationships of leader power to compliance and satisfaction with supervision: Evidence from a national sample of managers, Journal of Management

31.

Raven,B,H., (1992) A power-interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

32.

Russell,B., (1938) Power, Allen & Unwyn

33.

Triandis,H., (1995) Individualism and collectivism, Westview Press

34.

Vaughn, M. S., (1995) Drug abuse and anti-drug policy in Japan, The British Journal of Criminology

35.

Weber,M., (1972) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, J. C. B. Mohr

36.

Whitley,B.E.,Jr, (1998) Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as independent dimensions of prejudice, Paper presented at the 106th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco

37.

Whitley, B. E., Jr, (2000) The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality, Journal of Applied Social Psychology

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.14 No.3

Differences in Obedience to Authority between Authoritarians and Non-Authoritarians: in Three Authority-level Situations

Abstract

Reference

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues