바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

자기애와 성폭력의 관계: 경로모형 검증

The Relationship between Narcissism and Sexual Aggression:A Path Model

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2013, v.19 no.1, pp.45-68
박갑제 (충북대학교)
임성문 (충북대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 자기애와 성폭력의 관계에서 경로모형을 설정하고 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 자기애가 특권 분노에 영향을 미치고 특권 분노가 성적 지배에 영향을 미쳐 성폭력으로 연결되는 경로와, 자기애가 허용적 성태도에 영향을 미치고 허용적 성태도가 성적 대상화에 영향을 미쳐 성폭력으로 연결되는 경로로 구성된 이중 경로모형을 설정하였다. 또한 각 경로의 2차 매개변인인 성적 지배와 성적 대상화가 성폭력에 영향을 미치는 경로에서 알콜사용과 강간통념수용의 조절효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 모형적합성과 조절효과 검증을 위해, 충청지역 4개 대학교에서 수집한 368명의 질문지 자료를 사용하여 구조방정식 모형분석을 하였다. 모형검증 결과, 다양한 대안모형과 적합도 비교에서 1, 2차 매개변인들이 완전 매개하는 연구모형이 가장 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 연구모형의 성적 지배가 성폭력에 영향을 미치는 경로에서, 성적 지배동기가 높으면 알콜사용 수준이 높을 때 또는 강간통념수용 수준이 높을 때 성폭력이 대폭 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 논의에서는 본 연구 결과의 시사점 및 제언이 기술되었다.

keywords
Narcissism, Sexual Aggression, Sexual Dominance, Sexual Permissiveness, Sexual Objectification, Narcissistic Anger, Rape Myth Acceptance, Alcohol Use, 성폭력, 자기애, 성적 지배, 허용적 성태도, 성적 대상화, 자기애적 분노, 강간통념수용, 알콜사용

Abstract

In this study, We examined the dual path model in which entitlement rage and sexual dominance on the one of two pathway, sexual permissiveness and sexual objectification on another pathway mediated the relation between narcissism and sexual aggression. In addition, it was investigated whether alcohol use and rape myths acceptance have moderating effects in the pathways from sexual dominance and sexual objectification to sexual aggression on our path model. Data from 368 male college students in four university in Chungcheong province were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results in structural equation modeling exhibited that narcissism affected sexual aggression through mediating effects of entitlement rage and sexual dominance, and through mediating effects of sexual permissiveness and sexual objectification. Furthermore, alcohol use and rape myths acceptance only moderated the relation between sexual dominance and sexual aggression on our model. We discussed the meaning of results and the implications for further study.

keywords
Narcissism, Sexual Aggression, Sexual Dominance, Sexual Permissiveness, Sexual Objectification, Narcissistic Anger, Rape Myth Acceptance, Alcohol Use, 성폭력, 자기애, 성적 지배, 허용적 성태도, 성적 대상화, 자기애적 분노, 강간통념수용, 알콜사용

참고문헌

1.

경찰청, 한국형사정책연구원 (2012). 2011 범죄통계. 서울: 경찰청․한국형사정책연구원

2.

김계수 (2010). AMOS 18.0 구조방정식모형 분석. 서울: 한나래.

3.

양진원 (2012). 병리적 자기애 성향자의 웅대성과 취약성에 따른 정서적 특성. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문.

4.

이미정, 변화순, 김은정 (2009). 청년층 섹슈얼리티와 친밀한 관계에서의 성폭력 연구. 한국여성개발원 연구보고서, 2009(20), 1- 248. 한국여성정책연구원.

5.

이석재 (1999). 강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도 검증. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 2, 131-148

6.

이석재, 최상진 (2001). 강간통념수용도에 따른 성행동, 성폭력 및 성폭행사건 지각. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(1), 97-116.

7.

이영준 (2005). 성범죄자에 대한 치료사법적 대안 모색. 법무부․여성가족부․국가청소년 위원회․한국심리학회 공동주최 심포지움 자료집, 23-33.

8.

이준득, 서수균, 이훈진 (2007). 내현적, 외현적 자기애 성향자의 자기개념 명료성과 부정적 정서특성. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(2), 463-477.

9.

유재두, 송병호 (2009). 성범죄자 일반인의 강간통념 비교연구. 한국 공인행정학회보, 36, 133-163.

10.

전영실, 강은영, 박형민, 김혜정, 황태정, 정유희 (2007). 성폭력범죄의 유형과 재범억제방안. 연구총서, 2007(1), 33-803. 한국형사정책연구원.

11.

정남운 (2001). 자기애적 성격검사의 요인구조와 아이젱크 성격차원 및 자존감과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 13(2), 221-237.

12.

KBS (제작사), (2012, 11, 16). 2012 제18대 대선 박근혜 후보 토론회 (TV토론). 서울: KBS.

13.

최인숙 (2009). Hendrick 다차원적 성태도 척도의 타당화. 숙명여자대학교 박사학위청구논문.

14.

한국성폭력상담소 (2012). 2011년 한국성폭력상담소 상담통계현황. http://www. sisters.or. kr/index.php/subpage/pds/1에서 2012, 10, 6 인출.

15.

한수정 (1999). 자기애적 성격성향자의 외현적․내현적 자기관련 인지특성. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문.

16.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준의 그 근거. 한국임상심리학회지: 임상, 19, 161-177.

17.

Abbey, A., Jaues-Tiura, A. J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 450-464.

18.

Abbey, A., Parkhill, M. R., Beshears, R., Clinton- Sherrod, A. M., & Zawacki, T. (2006). Cross-sectional predictors of sexual assault perpetration in a community sample of single african american and caucasian men, Aggressive Behavior, 32(1), 54-67.

19.

Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., & Guild, D. (1977). The components of rapists’ sexual arousal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34(8), 895-903.

20.

American Psychiatric Association (1994). 정신장애의 진단 및 통계 편람 제4판. [Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Fourth edition] (이근후 외 역). 서울: 하나의학사. (원전은 1994에 출판)

21.

Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374-388.

22.

Bartky, S. L. (1990). Feminity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.

23.

Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Wallace, H. M. (2002). Conquest by force: A narcissistic reactance theory of rape and sexual coercion, Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 92-135.

24.

Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(1), 26-29.

25.

Baxter, D. J., Barbare, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1986). Sexual responses to consenting and forced sex in a large sample of rapists and nonrapists. Behavioral Research Therapy, 24(5), 513-520.

26.

Brown, R. P. (2004). Vengeance is mine: narcissism, vengeance, and the tendency to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6), 576-584.

27.

Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schhuster.

28.

Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230.

29.

Buss, D., & Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.

30.

Chantry, K., & Craig, R. J. (1994). Psychological screening of sexually violent offenders with the MCMI, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 430-435.

31.

Capbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds), Frontiers in social psychology: The self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

32.

Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484-495.

33.

Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game plying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340-354.

34.

Dean K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 449-455.

35.

Gangestad, S. (1993). Sexual selection and physical attractiveness: Implications for mating dynamics. Human Nature, 4(3), 205-235.

36.

Groth, N. (1979). Men who rape. NY: Plenum.

37.

Foster, J. D., Shrira, I., Campbell, W. K. (2006). Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(3), 367-386.

38.

Freund, K., Scher, H., Racansky, I. G., Campbell, K., & Heasman, G. (1986). Males disposed to commit rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(1), 23-35

39.

Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A Quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662-669.

40.

Heilbrun, A. B., & Loftus, M. P. (1986). The role of sadism and peer pressure in the sexual aggression of male college students. Journal of Sex Research, 22(3), 320-332.

41.

Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987). Multidemensionality of sexual attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 23(4), 502-526.

42.

Jonason, P. K., Gregory, N. P., Webster, D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5-18.

43.

Koss, M. P. (1988). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample in higher education. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and Sexual Assault, 11. New York: Garland Press.

44.

Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzerald, Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

45.

Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Winsniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.

46.

Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experience survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 455-457.

47.

Kosson, D. S., Kelly, J. C., White, J. W. (1997). Psychopathy-related traits predicts self-reported sexual aggression among college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 241-254.

48.

Li, N., & Kentrick, D. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468-489.

49.

Malamuth, N. M. (2003). Criminal and noncriminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchial mediational confluence model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 33-58.

50.

Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G, & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 353-369.

51.

Malamuth, N. M., Sickloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 670-681.

52.

McDonel, E. C., & McFall, R. M. (1991). Construct validity of two heterosocial perception skill measures for assessing rape proclivity. Violence and Victims, 6(1), 17-30.

53.

Mouilso, R. R., & Calhoun, K. S. (2012). A Mediation Model of the Role of Sociosexuality in the Associations Between Narcissism, Psychopathy, and Sexual Aggression. Psychology of Violence, 2(1), 16-27.

54.

Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.

55.

Nelson, P. A. (1979). Personality, sexual function, and sexual behavior: An experiment in methodology. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Florida, Florida. USA.

56.

Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 365-379.

57.

Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(3), 590.

58.

Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). A narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 159-162.

59.

Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal- component analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.

60.

Ryan, K. M., Weikel, K., & Sprechini, G. (2008) Gender differences in narcissism and courtship violence in dating couples. Sex Roles, 58, 802-813.

61.

Rhodewalt, F., & Sorrow, D. L. (2003). Interpersonal self regulation: Lessons from the study of narcissism. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangmey (Eds.) Handbook of self and identity (pp.519-535). New York: Guilford.

62.

Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6). 870-883.

63.

Stuck, T. S, & Sporer, S. L. (2002). When a Grandiose self-image is threatened: Narcissism and self-concept clarity as predictors of negative emotions and aggression following ego-threat. Journal of Personality, 70(4), 509-532.

64.

Symanski, D. M., Moffitt, L B., &, Carr, E. R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist January, 39(1), 6-38.

65.

Vega, V., & Malamuth, N. M. (2007). Predicting sexual aggression: The role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors, Aggressive Behavior, 33, 104-117.

66.

Wheeler, J. G., George, W. H., & Dahl, B. J. (2002). Sexually aggressive college males: Empathy as a moderator in the “Confluence Model” of sexual aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 759-775.

67.

Wildman, L., & McNulty, J. K. (2010). Sexual narcissism and the perpetration of sexual aggression. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 926-939.

68.

Williams, K. M., Cooper, B. S., Howell, T. M., Yuille, J. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Inferring sexually deviant behavior from corresponding fantasies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(2), 198-222.

69.

Yost, M. R., & Zurbriggen, E, L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(2), 163-173.

70.

Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawlowski, B., (2011). Female breast Size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1129-1135.

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제