바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0661
  • E-ISSN1229-0661
  • KCI

고령운전자의 자기-평가 안전운전행동, 운전이동성 및 주관적 안녕감 사이의 관계

The Relationship Between Older Driver’s Self-Report Safe Driving Behavior, Driving Mobility & Subjective Well-Being

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2014, v.20 no.4, pp.281-305
주미정 (부산대학교)
이재식 (부산대학교)

초록

본 연구에서는 고령운전자의 자기-평가 안전운전행동과 운전이동성(이동량, 안전운전능력, 상황적응능력 및 사회활동) 그리고 주관적 안녕감(삶의 만족, 긍정 정서 및 부정 정서) 사이의 상호관련성을 살펴보았다. 65세 이상의 남녀 고령운전자 142명을 대상으로 한국형 자기보고식 노인 안전운전행동 척도, 고령자 이동성 척도, 그리고 두 가지의 주관적 안녕감 척도(삶의 만족, 긍정 정서/부정 정서 척도)를 이용한 면대면 설문조사를 실시한 후 수집된 자료를 상관분석과 경로분석을 통해 분석하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 자기-평가 안전운전행동 점수가 높은 고령운전자는 주관적 안녕감도 높았다. 둘째, 자기-평가 안전운전행동 점수가 높은 고령운전자들은 운전이동성 전체 점수뿐만 아니라 물리적 이동량을 제외한 모든 운전이동성 하위요인에서의 점수도 높았다. 셋째, 물리적 이동량을 제외한 운전이동성의 하위요인 점수들, 그리고 운전이동성 전체점수가 높을수록 삶의 만족이나 정적 정서 점수는 높은 반면 부적 정서 점수는 낮았다. 넷째, 자기-평가 안전운전행동과 주관적 안녕감 사이의 관계에서 운전이동성의 전체점수와 이동성의 하위요인 중 물리적 이동량을 제외한 안전운전능력, 상황적응능력, 사회활동의 매개효과가 유의하였는데, 구체적으로 안전운전능력과 상황적응능력은 삶의 만족과 긍정 정서를 정적으로 완전매개한 반면, 안전운전능력과 사회활동은 부정 정서를 부적으로 완전매개하였다. 본 연구의 시사점과 추후 연구 방향에 대해 기술하였다.

keywords
고령운전자, 자기-평가 안전운전행동, 운전이동성, 주관적 안녕감, older driver, safe driving behavior, driving mobility, subjective well-being

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between older driver’s safe driving behavior, driving mobility(amount of driving, assessment for driving-related physical ability, confidence for adaptation in driving situation, amount of social activity) and subjective well-being(life satisfaction, positive/negative affect). The data of these variables were collected by questionnaire method based on face-to-face interview. The results can be summarized as followings. First, the older driver who reported higher scores in the self-report safe driving behavior questionnaire tended to show higher level of subjective well-being and driving-based mobility. Second, all the sub-factors in the driving-based mobility questionnaire were positively related to life satisfaction, positive affect but negatively related to negative affect except amount of driving. Finally, it was found that both confidence for adaptation in driving situation and amount of social activity positively mediated the relationship between self-report safe driving behavior and life satisfaction and positive affect, but confidence for adaptation in driving situation negatively mediated the relationship between self-report safe driving behavior and negative affect, Implication and suggestion were discussed.

keywords
고령운전자, 자기-평가 안전운전행동, 운전이동성, 주관적 안녕감, older driver, safe driving behavior, driving mobility, subjective well-being

참고문헌

1.

경찰청 (2014). 경찰통계. 서울: 경찰청.

2.

도로교통공단 (2013). 교통통계정보. 서울: 도로교통공단.

3.

박군석 (2007). 심포지움: 교통안전행동의 이해를 위한 심리학적 접근; 한국 노인운전자의 주관안녕에 영향을 미치는 심리적 요인들. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집, 2007(단일호), 50-51.

4.

서은국, 구재선 (2011). 단축형 행복 척도 (COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(1), 96-114.

5.

장혜란, 박선진, 이순철 (2009). 고령운전자의 이동성(Mobility)과 심리적 안녕감의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 15(2), 251-271.

6.

정윤주 (2013). 한국형 자가보고식 노인 안전운전행동 측정도구(K-SDBM) 개발 및 신뢰도 타당도 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사논문.

7.

Adler, G., & Rottunda, S. (2006). Older adults' perspectives on driving cessation. Journal of Aging studies, 20(3), 227-235.

8.

Anstey, K. J., Windsor, T. D., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R. (2006). Predicting Driving Cessation over 5 Years in Older Adults: Psychological Well‐Being and Cognitive Competence Are Stronger Predictors than Physical Health. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(1), 121-126.

9.

Bauer, M. J., Rottunda, S., & Adler, G. (2003). Older women and driving cessation. Qualitative Social Work, 2(3), 309-325.

10.

Burns, P. C. (1999). Navigation and the mobility of older drivers. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54(1), S49-S55.

11.

Carp, F. M. (1988). Significance of mobility for the well-being of the elderly. Transportation in an aging society: Improving mobility and safety of older persons, 1-20.

12.

Classen, S., Winter, S. M., Velozo, C. A., Bédard, M., Lanford, D. N., Brumback, B., & Lutz, B. J. (2010). Item development and validity testing for a self-and proxy report: The Safe Driving Behavior Measure. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(2), 296-305.

13.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.

14.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55(1), 34.

15.

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

16.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276- 302.

17.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being (pp. 247-266). Springer Netherlands.

18.

Dobbs, B. M., & Dobbs, A. R. (1997). De-licensing: mobility and related consequences for the patient and family members. In Transportation Research Board Seventy-Sixth Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

19.

Eisenhandler, S. A. (1990). The asphalt identikit: Old age and the driver's license. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 30(1), 1-14.

20.

Fonda, S. J., Wallace, R. B., & Herzog, A. R. (2001). Changes in driving patterns and worsening depressive symptoms among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(6), S343-S351.

21.

Gilhooly, M., Hamilton, K., O'Neill, M., Gow, J., Webster, N., Pike, F., & Bainbridge, D. (2002). Transport and ageing: extending quality of life for older people via public and private transport.

22.

Gwyther, H. & Holland, C. (2012). The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 19-28.

23.

Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Wahlström, B. (1998). Why do older drivers give up driving?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(3), 305-312.

24.

Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., Sirén, A., & Davidse, R. (2004). Older drivers: a review. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute.

25.

Jette, A. M., & Branch, L. G. (1992). A ten-year follow-up of driving patterns among the community-dwelling elderly. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34(1), 25-31.

26.

Keyes, C. L. M., & Ryff, C. D. (2000). Subjective change and mental health: A self-concept theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 264-279.

27.

Liddle, J., McKenna, K., & Broome, K. (2003). Older road users: From driving cessation to safe transportation. Sleep, 57(59.6), 59-1.

28.

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996). Discriminant validity of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.

29.

Marottoli, R. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A., & Williams, C. S. (1997). Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms: prospective evidence from the New Haven EPESE. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

30.

Metz, D. H. (2000). Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport policy, 7(2), 149-152.

31.

Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? (pp. 485-524). Springer US.

32.

Molnar, L. J., & Eby, D. W. (2008). The relationship between self-regulation and driving-related abilities in older drivers: an exploratory study. Traffic injury prevention, 9(4), 314-319.

33.

Parker, D., MacDonald, L., Sutcliffe, P., & Rabbitt, P. (2001). Confidence and the older driver. Ageing and Society, 21, 169-182.

34.

Ragland, D. R., Satariano, W. A., & MacLeod, K. E. (2004). Reasons given by older people for limitation or avoidance of driving. The Gerontologist, 44(2), 237-244.

35.

Ragland, D. R., Satariano, W. A., & MacLeod, K. E. (2005). Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 60(3), 399-403.

36.

Ritter, A. S., Straight, A., & Evans, E. L. (2002). Understanding senior transportation: Report and analysis of a survey of consumers age 50. AARP, Public Policy Institute.

37.

Robson, P. (1982). Patterns of activity and mobility among the elderly. Geographical perspectives on the elderly, 265-280.

38.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.

39.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422.

40.

Siren, A. (2005). Older women's mobility and transportation issues: Restraints and regulations, lust and splendour. University of Helsinki.

41.

Siren, A., & Meng, A. (2013). Older drivers’ self-assessed driving skills, driving-related stress and self-regulation in traffic. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 17, 88-97.

42.

Siren, A., Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Lindeman, M. (2004). Driving cessation and health in older women. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 23(1), 58-69.

43.

Spinney, J. E., Scott, D. M., & Newbold, K. B. (2009). Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians. Transport Policy, 16(1), 1-11.

44.

Stewart, R. B., Moore, M. T., Marks, R. G., May, F. E., & Hale, W. E. (1993). Driving cessation and accidents in the elderly: An analysis of symptoms, diseases, cognitive dysfunction and medications.

45.

Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2012). The effects of positive emotion priming on self-reported reckless driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 718-725.

46.

Webber, S. C., Porter, M. M., & Menec, V. H. (2010). Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. The Gerontologist, 50(4), 443-450.

47.

Zautra, A., Potter, P. T., & Reich, J. W. (1997). The independence of affects is context-dependent: An integrative model of the relationship between positive and negative affect. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17 (1997): Focus on Emotion and Adult Development, 17, 75.

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제