바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.3
Citation Share

Differential Effects of Subjective Evaluation for Attention and Situation Adaptability on Driving Mobility as a Function of Driver's Age: Moderating Effect of Motivation

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2015, v.21 no.3, pp.457-479






& (2015). Differential Effects of Subjective Evaluation for Attention and Situation Adaptability on Driving Mobility as a Function of Driver's Age: Moderating Effect of Motivation. Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 21(3), 457-479.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study investigated the differential effects of subjective evaluation for attention and situation adaptability, and motivation on driving mobility as a function of driver's age. The results can be summarized as followings. First, subjective capability evaluation tended to decrease as the drivers' age increased, and lower evaluation for situation adaptability seemed to be recognized earlier than attentional ability in middle-aged drivers. Second, although subjective evaluation for attentional ability predicted positively driving mobility of all age groups, but only subjective evaluation for situation adaptability predicted positively driving mobility of older drivers. Third, among motivational elements, BAS predicted positively driving mobility of young and middle-aged driviers, whereas BIS predicted positively driving mobility of older drivers. Finally, middle-aged drivers tended show increased driving mobility when their attentional ability score and BAS were high, whereas older drivers showed lowest level of driving mobility when their situation adaptability score and BIS were low. These results suggest importance of integrated consideration for drivers' subjective evaluation for attention and situation adaptability, and motivation to understand characteristics of driving mobility in different age groups.

keywords
주의능력, 외부한경 적응능력, 운전이동성, 접근/회피동기, attentional ability, situation adaptability, driving mobility, BIS/BAS

Reference

1.

김교헌, 김원식 (2001). 한국판 행동활성화 및행동억제 체계(BAS/BIS) 척도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6, 19-37.

2.

도로교통공단 (2013). 교통통계정보. 서울: 도로교통공단.

3.

박군석 (2007). 교통안전행동의 이해를 위한심리학적 접근; 한국 노인운전자의 주관안녕에 영향을 미치는 심리적 요인들. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집, 50-51.

4.

박선진, 이순철, 장혜란 (2008). 고령 운전자의상황적응능력과 만성질환이 운전행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(2). 1-19.

5.

이재식 (2015). 고령운전자의 주관적 운전역량평가와 운전이동량 사이의 관계: 접근/회피동기의 조절효과. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 17, 1513-1530.

6.

장혜란, 박선진, 이순철 (2009). 고령운전자의이동성(Mobility)과 심리적 안녕감의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 15(2), 251-271.

7.

정윤주 (2013). 한국형 자가보고식 노인 안전운전행동 측정도구(K-SDBM) 개발 및 신뢰도 타당도 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사논문.

8.

주미정, 이재식 (2014). 고령운전자의 접근/회피동기와 삶의 만족 사이의 관계: 이동성과 정서성의 매개효과. 감성과학, 17, 29-40.

9.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

10.

Arnett, J. J. (1996). Sensation seeking, aggressiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(6), 693-702.

11.

Baldock, M., Mathias, J. L., McLean, A. J., & Berndt, A. (2006). Self-regulation of driving and its relationship to driving ability among older adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38(5), 1038-1045.

12.

Ball, K., Owsley, C., Stalvey, B., Roenker, D. L., Sloane, M. E., & Graves, M. (1998). Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(3), 313-322

13.

Blanchard, E. B., Hickling, E. J., Taylor, A. E., Loos, W. R., & Gerardi, R. J. (1994). Psychological morbidity associated with motor vehicle accidents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(3), 283-290.

14.

Burns, P. C. (1999). Navigation and the mobility of older drivers. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54(1), S49-S55.

15.

Carp, F. M. (1988). Significance of mobility for the well-being of the elderly. Transportation in an aging society: Improving mobility and safety of older persons, 1-20.

16.

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(2), 319-333.

17.

Charlton, J. L., Oxley, J., Fildes, B., Oxley, P., Newstead, S., Koppel, S., & O’Hare, M. (2006). Characteristics of older drivers who adopt self-regulatory driving behaviors. Transportation research Part F9, 363-373.

18.

Classen, S., Winter, S. M., Velozo, C. A., Bédard, M., Lanford, D. N., Brumback, B., & Lutz, B. J. (2010). Item development and validity testing for a self-and proxy report: The Safe Driving Behavior Measure. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(2), 296-305.

19.

Collins, A. L., Goldman, N., & Rodriguez, G. (2008). Is positive well-being protective of mobility limitations among older adults? The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), 321-327.

20.

Craik, J. M. (2011). Occupational therapists lead a national injury prevention strategy to help older drivers. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(2), 137-140.

21.

De Raedt, R., & Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. (2000). The relationship between cognitive/neuropsychological factors and car driving performance in older adults, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 1664-1668.

22.

Edwards, J. D., Lunsman, M., Perkins, M., Rebok, G. W., & Roth, D. L. (2009). Driving cessation and health trajectories in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A:Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64(12), 1290-1295.

23.

Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(4), 493-509.

24.

Groeger, J. A., & Brown, I. D. (1989). Assessing one’s own and others' driving ability:influences of sex, age, and experience. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 21(2), 155-168.

25.

Gwyther, H., & Holland, C. (2012). The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 19-28.

26.

Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Wahlström, B. (1998). Why do older drivers give up driving?. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(3), 305-312.

27.

Hole, G. (2007). The Psychology of Driving. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

28.

Hundt, N. E., Nelson-Gray, R. O., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T., & Kwapil, T. K. (2007). The interaction of reinforcement sensitivity and life events in the prediction of an hedonic depression and mixed anxiety-depression symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1001-1012.

29.

Marottoli，R. A., & Richardson, E. M. (1998). Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 331-336.

30.

Meng, A., & Siren, A. (2012). Cognitive problems, self-rated changes in driving skills, drivingrelated discomfort and self-regulation of driving in old drivers. Accident Analysis &Prevention, 49, 322-329.

31.

Scott-Parker, B., Watson, B., & King, M. J. (2009). Understanding the psychosocial factors influencing the risky behaviour of young drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6), 470-482.

32.

Sims, R. V., Owsley, C., Allman, R. M., Ball, K., & Smoot, T. M. (1998). A preliminary assessment of the medical and functional factors associated with vehicle crashes by older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 556-561.

33.

Siren, A., Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Lindeman, M. (2004). Driving cessation and health in older women. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 23(1), 58-69.

34.

Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47(2), 143-148.

35.

Wilde, G. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis:implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2, 209-225.

Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues

e-Submission OA Policy