바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1226-9654

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.23 No.2

Citation Share

단어 인지에 미치는 낭독의 효과

The Effects of Oral Reading on Word Recognition

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2011, v.23 no.2, pp.271-285
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.2.006
이인선 (영남대학교)
이광오 (영남대학교)
이인선, & 이광오. (2011). 단어 인지에 미치는 낭독의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(2), 271-285, https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.2.006

초록

낭독이 단어 인지에 미치는 효과를 조사하기 위해서 두 개의 실험을 실시하였다. 실험 1에서는 사전처치(낭독, 묵독, 심적회전)에 따라 명명과 어휘판단의 수행이 어떻게 달라지는지 조사하였다. 실험 1의 결과, 낭독의 효과는 유의하게 나타나지 않았다. 실험 2에서는 개인의 독서습관(음운변환 대 음운무변환)에 따른 낭독의 효과를 조사하였다. 실험 2의 결과, 음운무변환자가 음운변환자보다 명명에서 더 큰 낭독 효과를 보여주었다. 한편, 어휘판단에서는, 음운변환자는 묵독 조건에서, 음운무변환자는 낭독 조건에서, 수행이 더 좋았다. 이러한 결과는, 낭독의 효과가 음운변환과 관련한 독서습관에 따라 달라질 수 있음을 시사한다.

keywords
oral reading, subvocalization, word recognition, lexical decision, naming, 낭독, 음운변환, 단어인지, 어휘판단, 명명

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of oral reading on word recognition. Experiment 1 aimed to examine how naming and lexical decision performances differ as a function of pre-task treatment: oral reading, silent reading, and non-verbal mental rotation. The results of Experiment 1 revealed no significant effect of oral reading on naming and lexical decision. In Experiment 2, how individual differences in subvocalization during reading modulates effects of oral reading was explored. For this, subvocalizers and non-subvocalizers were divided according to their scores in the articulatory suppression task. The results showed that subvocalizers performed naming better after a 10-minute oral reading practice. But, for lexical decision, subvocalizers did better in the silent reading condition, whereas non-subvocalizers did better in oral reading condition. The results from the two experiments were explained in terms of facilitaions in lexical access.

keywords
oral reading, subvocalization, word recognition, lexical decision, naming, 낭독, 음운변환, 단어인지, 어휘판단, 명명

참고문헌

1.

민승기 (2002). 한글 단어 인지과정에서 구체성 효과. 영남대학교 일반대학원 석사학위청구논문.

2.

박영민 (2003). 독서의 발달과 음독에서 묵독으로의 이해. 국어교육, 111, 59-86.

3.

이광오 (2003). 단어인지 수행은 어종에 따라 다를까?. 한국실험심리학회지: 실험 및 인지. 15(4), 479-499.

4.

이광주 (2001). 아름다운 지상의 책 한권, 서울: 한길 아트.

5.

최광일 (2001). 한국어 관계절 부착의 중의성. 아주대학교 일반대학원 석사학위청구논문.

6.

高橋麻衣子 (2004). 黙読と音読による文理解の違い: 音韻変換と注意資源の役割に注目して. 認知科学, 13(1), 121-124.

7.

福田由紀 (2005). 読みの形態による詩の理解への影響. 日本認知心理学会第3回大会発表論文集, 80, 701-703.

8.

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: “A dual route cascaded of visual word recognition and reading aloud.” Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.

9.

Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341-361.

10.

Daneman, M., & Station, M. (1991). Phonological recoding in silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 17 (4), 618-632.

11.

Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.

12.

Hardyck, C. D., & Petrinovich, L. F. (1969). Treatment of subvocal speech during reading. Journal of Reading, 12, 361-368.

13.

Hopkins, R. H., & Edwards, R. E. (1972). Pronunciation effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 534-537.

14.

Klinkenborg, Verlyn (2009, 5, 16). Some Thoughts on the Lost Art of Reading Aloud. The Newyork Times. A18. http://www.nytimes.com/ 2009/05/16/opinion/16sat4.html

15.

MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 671-685.

16.

Manguel, Alberto (2000). 독서의 역사 [A History of Reading]. (정명진 역). 서울: 세종서적. (원전은 1996에 출판).

17.

McCallum, R. S., Sharp, S., Bell, S. M., & George, T. (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 41 (2), 241-246.

18.

Miller S. D., & Smith D. E. P. (1985). Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 341-348.

19.

Miller S. D., & Smith D. E. P. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Reading Research and Instruction, 29, 73-84.

20.

Miura N, Iwata K, Watanabe J, Sugiura M, Akitsuki Y, Sassa Y, Ikuta N, Okamoto H, Watanabe Y, Riera J, Maeda Y, Matsue Y, & Kawashima R. (2003). Cortical activation during reading aloud of long sentences: fMRI study. Neuroreport, 14 (12), 1563-1566.

21.

Prior, S. M., & Welling, K. A. (2001). Read in your head: A Vygotskian analysis of the transition from oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology, 22, 1-15.

22.

Protopapas, A. (2007). CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 859–862.

23.

Richardson, J. T. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). The effect of articulatory suppression in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 623-629.

24.

Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.

25.

Swalm, J. E. (1972). A comparison of or oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension. Education, 92(4). 111-115.

26.

Uchida, S. & Kawashima, R. (2008) Reading and solving arithmetic problems improves cognitive functions of normal aged people: a randomized controlled study. AGE 30, 21-29.

27.

Wright, G., Sherman, R. & Timothy, B. J. (2004). Are silent reading behaviors of first graders really silent? Reading Teacher, 57 (6), 546-553.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물

논문 투고 OA 정책