바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

학습 방식과 학습 목표가 학습 후 질문과 이해도에 미치는 영향

How Study Conditions and learning goals Affect Students’ Questioning and Comprehension

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 / The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, (P)1226-9654; (E)2733-466X
2016, v.28 no.3, pp.517-541
https://doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2016.28.3.007
배수정 (서울대학교 심리학과 & 심리과학연구소)
박주용 (서울대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

능동적 학습을 촉진하는 한 방법은 학습자로 하여금 질문을 던지도록 하는 것이다. 그런데 실제 수업 장면에서 학생들은 질문을 많이 던지지 않을 뿐만 아니라, 질문을 던지더라도 피상적인 수준에 머무른다는 것이 반복적으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 질문의 중요성을 강조하면서 실제로 학습 후에 그 질문이 평가되도록 하면, 질문의 양과 질이 향상되는지 그리고 학습 자료에 대한 이해도 향상되는지를 알아보기 위해 수행되었다. 실험 1에서는 학습 방식과 학습 목표를 각각 두 수준에서 조작한 2x2 요인설계가 사용되었다. 학습 방식은 강의 듣기와 혼자 학습하기의 두 수준으로, 학습 목표는 질문 강조와 이해 강조의 두 수준으로 각각 세분되었다. 이렇게 구분된 4 집단 각각에 대해 학생들이 만들어 낸 질문의 양과 질, 그리고 학습 자료에 대한 이해도를 평가하여 그 차이를 비교하였다. 그 결과 질문의 수와 질은 혼자 학습하며 질문을 강조한 집단이 가장 우수하였고, 이해는 학습 방식에 상관없이 질문을 강조하였을 때가 이해를 강조하였을 때보다 더 우수하였다. 실험 2에서는 실험 1의 결과를 상이한 분야와 난이도의 학습자료로 반복 검증하였다. 실험 1과 2의 결과는 교재로 자습하게 하고 질문을 강조할 때 학생들의 질문의 개수와 질이 가장 높음을 보여주었다. 이는 학생들의 질문을 증가시키고자 할 때 교수자와의 관계나 분위기를 비롯한 환경적인 요인을 개선함과 동시에 적절한 학습 방식과 목표를 가질 수 있도록 하는 것이 중요함을 시사한다.

keywords
학습자 질문, 질문 만들기, 대학 수업, 학습 방식, 학습 목표, students’ question, question generation, college class, study conditions, goals

Abstract

One way to promote active learning is to have students think up questions on the subject matter. However, it has been repeatedly found that students in actual class setting, do not often ask questions and, if they do, usually ask superficial ones. This study was carried out to examine whether the number and quality of students’ questions improve if these questions are included in assessment and whether raising questions results in deeper understanding of the studied material. In Experiment 1, a 2 x 2 factorial design was used, in which two study conditions and two sets of directions were implemented. The two study conditions were listening to a lecture and self-studying. The two sets of directions were emphasis on raising questions and emphasis on comprehension. We compared the number and quality of questions and the level of comprehension among the four groups. Results revealed that the number and quality of questions were highest in self-study/question emphasis group. The level of comprehension was higher in question emphasis groups than in comprehension emphasis groups, regardless of the study conditions. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1 using more easy learning material in another domain. Implications of these results and directions for future research were discussed.

keywords
학습자 질문, 질문 만들기, 대학 수업, 학습 방식, 학습 목표, students’ question, question generation, college class, study conditions, goals

참고문헌

1.

Allison, A., & Shrigley, R. L. (1986). Teaching children to ask operational questions in science. Science Education, 70(1), 73-80.

2.

Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning?. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 280-318.

3.

Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.

4.

Beyer, B. K. (1987). Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

5.

Biddulph, F., Symington, D., & Osborne, R. (1986). The place of children's questions in primary science education. Research in Science &Technological Education, 4(1), 77-88.

6.

Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, 2, 13-17.

7.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, F. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. New York: Longman.

8.

Bowker, M. H. (2010). Teaching students to ask questions instead of answering them. Thought & Action, 26, 127-134.

9.

Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrera, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In Flavell, J. H., & Mussen, P. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.

10.

Bryan, C., & Clegg, K. (Eds.). (2006). Innovative assessment in higher education. Abingdon:Routledge.

11.

Buswell, G. T. (1956). Patterns of thinking in solving problems. University of California publications in education, Vol.12, No.2. (pp 63-148). Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms:A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157-178.

13.

Chan, C. K. (1992). Constructive Activity in Learning from Text. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 97-118.

14.

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.

15.

Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigations: What questions do pupils ask?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269-287.

16.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students'questions: a potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39.

17.

Christenbury, L., & Kelly, P. P. (1983). Questioning:A Path to Critical Thinking. Urbana, IL:National Council of Teachers of English.

18.

Cohen, R. (1983). Self-generated questions as an aid to reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36(8), 770-775.

19.

Commeyras, M. (1995). What can we learn from students’ questions?. Theory Into Practice, 34(2), 101-106.

20.

Crabtree, T., Alber-Morgan, S. R., & Konrad, M. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring of story elements on the reading comprehension of high school seniors with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(2), 187-203.

21.

Cuccio‐Schirripa, S., & Steiner, H. E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 210-224.

22.

Danks, J. H., & End, L. J. (1987). Processing strategies for reading and listening. Comprehending Oral and Written Language, 271-294.

23.

Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem Finding and Solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(2), 97-111.

24.

Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(3), 197-210.

25.

Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Questionposing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 411-430.

26.

Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450.

27.

Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1998). The role of Socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning. The Clearing House, 71(5), 297-301.

28.

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44-48.

29.

Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing Student Learning and Development: A Guide to the Principles, Goals, and Methods of Determining College Outcomes. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.

30.

Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science:Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.

31.

Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1990). Modifying reading instruction to maximize its effectiveness for all students. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, NO. 489, (pp. 2-20). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Center for the Study of Reading.

32.

Gibbs, G. (2006). 2 How assessment frames student learning. In Bryan & Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 23-36). New York: Routledge.

33.

Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology. New York:Addison Wesley Longman.

34.

Graesser, A. C., Langston, M. C., & Baggett, W. B. (1993). Exploring information about concepts by asking questions. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 29, 411-436.

35.

Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524.

36.

Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.

37.

Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 222-234.

38.

Hamilton, E., & Cairns, H. (1961). Plato: The collected dialogues. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

39.

Harper, K. A., Etkina, E., & Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 776-791.

40.

Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). RESEARCH REPORT: Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 47-62.

41.

Hwang, C. I., & Lee, S. H. (2011). An Analysis of Hindrance Factors of Students' Questioning in the University Lecture Class. Educational Research Institute College of Education, 42(1), 181-212.

42.

Joseph, L. M., Alber-Morgan, S., Cullen, J., & Rouse, C. (2016). The effects of self-questioning on reading comprehension: A literature review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(2), 152-173.

43.

Karabenick, S. A., & Sharma, R. (1994). Perceived teacher support of student questioning in the college classroom: Its relation to student characteristics and role in the classroom questioning process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 90.

44.

Keil, G. E. (1965). Writing and solving original problems as a means of improving verbal arithmetic problem solving ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Indiana.

45.

Kim, D. S., Park, I. K., Sung, E. M., Kook, D. S., Kim, I. G., Son, Y. C., Ro, S. H., & Kim, H. K. (1993). Middle School Students'conceptual change about science concepts through traditional teaching and learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 13(1), 100-120.

46.

Kim, J. J. (2001). Analysis of high school students'questions appeared in science classes with the demonstration of a discrepant situation (Master dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.

47.

Kim, J. M. (1995). The Role of cognitive strategic questioning in the changes of student's conceptions about heat and temperature (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.

48.

Kim, S. R. (2014). A Validation Study of Learners'Questioning Hesitation Factor Scale during College Lectures. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 22(3), 249-271.

49.

Kim, S. R. (2015). Moderating Effects of Teacher Positive Support on the Relationship between Learners’ Internal Hesitation of Questioning and Question Asking. Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 27(2), 195-210.

50.

Kim, S. R., & Song, I. S. (2014). The Structural Relationship Among Learners’ Questioning Process, Questioning Hesitation Factors and Problem Solving during College Lectures. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(2), 269-290.

51.

King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(4), 366-381.

52.

King, A. (1995). Inquiring Minds Really Do Want to Know: Using Questioning to Teach Critical Thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 13-17.

53.

Koch, A., & Eckstein, S. G. (1991). Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students’ question formulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 473-485.

54.

Lim, H. Y., & Hwang, C. I. (2010). Learner’s Perception on the Teachers’ Questioning Behaviors in University General Education Class. Journal of Educational Development, 26(2), 129-148.

55.

Marbach-Ad, G., & Claassen, L. A. (2001). Improving students' questions in inquiry labs. The American Biology Teacher, 63(6), 410-419.

56.

Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854-870.

57.

Maskill, R., & de Jesus, H. P. (1997). Pupils’questions, alternative frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), 781-799.

58.

McComas, W. F., & Abraham, L. (2004). Asking More Effective Questions. Retrieved from:http://cet.usc.edu/resources/teaching_learning/docs/Asking_Better_Questions.pdf (online).

59.

Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18(3), 357-364.

60.

Olshavsky, J. E. (1977). Reading as problem solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 4, 654-674.

61.

Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489-508.

62.

Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1985). The Generative Learning Model and Its Implications for Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59-87.

63.

Park, J. (2016). ClassPrep: A peer review system for class preparation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-13.

64.

Park, M. H., Kim, S. H., Park, M. S., Lee, J. K., Park, J. H., & Lee, S. L. (2005). A Demand Analysis of University Teaching and Learning I: Focusing on Faculties of the Dongguk University. The Koeran Journal of Educational Studies, 16, 5-30.

65.

Park, U. J. (1998). The Effects of Guided Reciprocal Questioning Activities on Middle School Students'Learning Force-related Unit in Class (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.

66.

Pearson, P. D. (1991). Developing expertise in reading comprehension: what should be taught?: how should it be taught?. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 512.

67.

Pedrosa de Jesus, H., Almeida, P. C., & Watts, M. (2004). Questioning styles and students'learning: Four case studies. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 531-548.

68.

Perez, J. A. (1985). Effects of student-generated problems on problem solving performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

69.

Pizzini, E. L., & Shepardson, D. P. (1991). Student questioning in the presence of the teacher during problem solving in science. School Science and Mathematics, 91(8), 348-352.

70.

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of educational research, 66(2), 181-221.

71.

Ross, W. (1860). Methods of instruction. Barnard's American Journal of Education 9, 367-79.

72.

Ryu, Joe, & Yoon. (2007). Exploratory Analysis of Learner Generating Questions. Journal of Educational Research, 30, 109-129.

73.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. Thinking and Learning Skills, 2, 563-577.

74.

Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

75.

Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. Instructionaldesign Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 161-181.

76.

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.

77.

Schiefele, U. (1992). Topic interest and levels of text comprehension. In. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.) The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 151-182). New York: Psychology Press.

78.

Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom:student questions as course curriculum in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 57(5), 278-281.

79.

Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1980). Reading and Learning from Text. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.

80.

Tobin, K. (1987). Forces which shape the implemented curriculum in high school science and mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 287-298.

81.

Van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081-1087.

82.

Van der Meij, H. (1994). Student questioning: A componential analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 137-161.

83.

Wayne, A. A., & Shrigley, R. L. (1986). Teaching children to ask operational questions in science. Science Education, 70(1), 73-80.

84.

Wong, B. Y. (1979). Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(2), 42-47.

85.

Wong, B. Y. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.

86.

Yang, M. K. (2007). Generating questions on purpose: its educational significance and limitations. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 15(2), 1-20.

87.

Yarden, A., Brill, G., & Falk, H. (2001). Primary literature as a basis for a high-school biology curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 190-195.

88.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329.

89.

Zoller, U. (1987). The Fostering of Question-Asking Capability. A Meaningful Aspect of Problem Solving in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 510-12.

한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물